Lucent Technologies, And Their Drop From A Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
878
Cite

¶ … Lucent Technologies, and their drop from a top-Rated company to one in danger of bankruptcy. WHAT WENT WRONG

At one time, Lucent Technologies was the most widely held stock in the United States. Therefore, when they issued an earnings warning in 2000, most of the financial world was shocked. How could Lucent lose money? Some advisors were not caught off guard, and had been warning about Lucent for months, including the Motley Fool. What happened to Lucent, and can they recover?

Some background on Lucent is necessary to understand their fall from grace. Lucent formed out of the old Bell Laboratories, "the research and development arm of AT&T that has spawned such telecommunications technologies as the T-1 circuit, digital signaling, and the Private Branch Exchange (PBX), upon which the majority of office telecommunications environments are currently run" (Richey, Mann, and Gardner).

While they invented just about all the modern communications technologies, most of their business is still based on voice, circuit-switched networks, rather than newer digital technologies. The bottom line is, they have not kept current with market trends, and are still highly involved in "old-age" technologies. "To put it simply, Lucent's management screwed up. They mis-executed on a number of fronts, including manufacturing bugaboos and being out of touch with their customers' technology needs" (Richey, Mann,...

...

They are not selling enough to warrant higher inventories, and they are not collecting revenues quickly enough on what they have already sold. This is one reason Lucent began to have troubles, and had to issue warnings about their projected revenues.
Another major reason is the more than generous credit terms they were offering customers. These terms allowed customers longer to pay for their products, and kept the money out of Lucent's hands longer, creating serious cash flow problems.

Two of Lucent's biggest competitors are Cisco Systems and Nortel Networks. At the end of 2000,"Nortel Networks increased its sales 34% and Cisco's sales grew 53%. That same study indicated that Lucent's sales fell 10%. When Lucent pre-announced in October, it stated that revenues from optical networking systems were down about 5%" (Weiss). We see that while Lucent was losing money, their competitors were growing their business by large amounts, leaving Lucent further behind in their technology growth. Lucent did not seem to recognize how popular high-speed fiber optics would be for business and even personal use, and failed to grow with the market.

When they did try to move ahead in the market, they made poor choices in the companies they chose…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Author not available. "Success Built on Failure' Being Taken Too Literally." SatireWire. 2001. http://www.satirewire.com/news/0104/success.shtml

D'Amelio, Frank. "2nd Quarter 2002 Earnings." Lucent Technologies. 2002. http://www.lucent.com/investor/charts/2q02charts.pdf

Richey, Matt, Mann, Bill, and Gardner, Tom. "Lessons From Lucent." Motley Fool. 13 Jan. 2000. http://www.fool.com/specials/2000/sp000113lucent.htm

Weiss, Phil. "Lucent At Bat." Motley Fool. 23 Oct. 2000. http://www.fool.com/Specials/2000/sp001023.htm


Cite this Document:

"Lucent Technologies And Their Drop From A" (2002, May 03) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/lucent-technologies-and-their-drop-from-131511

"Lucent Technologies And Their Drop From A" 03 May 2002. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/lucent-technologies-and-their-drop-from-131511>

"Lucent Technologies And Their Drop From A", 03 May 2002, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/lucent-technologies-and-their-drop-from-131511

Related Documents
Lucent Technology
PAGES 2 WORDS 585

Lucent Technology After conducting a DuPont decomposition of Lucent's return on equity (ROE) from the first quarters of 1998, 1999, and 2000 it is essential to realize that those ROEs are, in order, .238, .179, and .072. It is highly important to see the downward trend in those ROEs, which was not commensurate with the company's stock during this time period. The company's stock was steadily rising while its ROE was

Carly Fiorina and Followership How Carly Fiorina Influenced an Organization Prior to joining the giant company, HP, Carly Fiorina had served in AT&T and Lucent Technologies, in the senior leadership ranks for around two decades. She successfully led to the growth of AT&T and led the execution of Lucent Technologies from its spinoff from AT&T. In so doing, she managed to find favor from the HP's board of directors, and given a

Nortel also lost ground in the 3G wireless market to a host of new startups with focused business models and an optical/IP emphasis that appealed to that market (Jander and Bulkey, 2001). In 2001, Nortel made the decision to exit the DSL business after experiencing weak demand. Last, but not least, Nortel's management was slow to react to market conditions. As evidence, closest direct rival Lucent Technologies overtook Nortel in

Wireless Networking
PAGES 44 WORDS 12201

Wireless Networking Phenomenon Today's world is faced with a myriad of challenging and complex issues that require advanced technological solutions. As technology becomes increasingly user-friendly and focused on the consumer, it is evident that users have become more dependent on wireless technological devices as mechanisms that promote convenience, survival, and economic prosperity. Devices such as cellular phones, laptop computers, and personal digital assistants have become absolute essential components for many consumers

The deal was immediately criticized as anti-competitive by William Kennard, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, and by the Communications Workers of America, which represents some workers at both of the merged companies. But neither government regulators nor union bureaucrats will have the slightest impact on the latest merger. They have neither the power nor the desire to oppose the plans of the giant telecommunications monopolies. More substantial opposition

With such result, estimates for the 2,400 F-111 (including their exports) were significantly reduced, but nevertheless, General Dynamics still managed to obtain a $300 million profit with this project. Grumman started also to build the F-14 Tomcat, using many of the F-111 innovations, but build solely for its purpose of serving as a carrier-borne fighter. General Dynamics Reorganization - it was in May 1965 that the company reorganized its activities into