Verified Document

Luxury And Different Artistic Traditions In The Levant Essay

Analysis of Luxurious Forms: The Levant, Greece, and Beyond

According to Feldman (2002), 13th and 14th century B.C.E. Mediterranean art is often characterized as international in nature. This means that across many different regions and geographical areas, works of art and artifacts exhibit similar features, reflecting the cross-pollination of different ideas and material forms. This is underlined by the fact that such internationalization is particularly reflected in portable luxury goods such as ivory, gold, and alabaster across the Levant, into Cypress and beyond. The wealthy could easily transport and exchange such materials into their homes, without regard to cultural tradition. However, Feldman (2002) attempts to add nuance and complexity to the term international, suggesting that within the very broad characterization there is considerably more variety, stylistically speaking, than might seem to exist on the surface.

Feldman (2002) specifically posits that an indigenous Levantine versus a true international style in many luxury goods exists on a continuum. She suggests there are more indigenous, common forms and motifs than previously acknowledged within many...

A much smaller percentage of objects exhibit a truly compositionally international style. For example, in her analysis of the site of Ugarit, Feldman (2002) notes one ivory head displays strong formal parallels with a stone head from an earlier Levantine context including eyes with raised rims, arched eyebrows, and a prominent nose which...
…as essentially of the same era of art, although she does acknowledge that luxury goods that were easily portable share more formulaic elements and images, such as one furniture panel she analyzes containing both Egyptian and Hittite iconography (Feldman, 2002). However, some Greek pieces are notable for their indigenous style, such as some elaborate ivory works from Cyprus which she states show koine expression, in a manner which is much more indigenous in quality even than the Levant pieces of the Mediterranean. This makes sense to some degree, given that Greece was made up of many city-states, often in the form of disconnected islands, each forming its own unique cultural expression. Even though many such city-states engaged in…

Sources used in this document:

references.


Yet Feldman (2002) notes that this is not true in another example, that of the attack scenes of lions, griffins, and bulls found on one faience found in Delos. It is extremely similar to many such vases also found both in mainland Cypress and the Levant that, “All these luxurious objects have in common a restricted repertoire of motific elements and themes” (p.21). Their nonnarrative vignettes and are probably linked to specific manufacturing sites because of their degree of similarity and are difficult, partially because of their fragmented nature, to link to a specific tradition within Greece (Feldman, 2002). She is more comfortable calling such Greek designs international in quality.


In other words, Feldman (2002) does not entirely dismiss the utility of calling some of these works international in nature, rather than indigenous. Rather, she argues for a continuum, rather than painting all artifacts from this period with a broad brush, and argues that each must be evaluated on its own terms.


Reference


1400-1200 B.C.E. The Art Bulletin, 84(1), 6–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/3177251

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now