Madeleine Mccann Case Case Study

PAGES
2
WORDS
792
Cite

Madeleine McCann When Madeleine McCann's parents put her down to sleep and went out to eat with friends while on holiday in Portugal in at a tapas bar approximately 50 meters from their apartment, they never thought that their 3-year-old daughter would be snatched from their room. While the McCann's immediately reported their daughter's disappearance to Portuguese authorities, massive procedural errors including failure to secure the crime scene, contaminating the scene, and failure to collect evidence have impeded efforts to locate or determine if Madeleine was alive at the time of her disappearance. Portuguese and Scotland Yard continue to probe into Madeleine's disappearance six years after her disappearance as new evidence and eyewitness testimony surfaces.

Madeleine McCann's Disappearance

Madeleine McCann was less than a week from turning 4-years-old when she disappeared from the apartment her family was renting while on holiday in Praia da Luz in Portugal on May 3, 2007. The McCanns, on holiday from Rothley, Leicestershire, left their three sleeping children, Madeleine and her twin siblings, in their apartment while they dined with friends at a tapas restaurant 50 meters away from the restaurant (Grice, 2013). Although the McCanns periodically checked in on their sleeping children, when...

...

While there were several eyewitness accounts claiming that a man was seen carrying away a child matching Madeleine's description the night she disappeared, egregious missteps by the Portuguese police resulted in the loss of possibly valuable forensic evidence and delays in the investigation.
One of the largest errors committed by the Portuguese police was the failure to collect evidence and secure the crime scene immediately. It was revealed in November 2007, six months after Madeleine's disappearance, that "[d]etectives failed to send her bedding for analysis, even though an abductor could have left fibres, fingerprints or DNA on it" (Allen, 2007). Additionally, "[b]y the time officers returned to the Ocean Club apartment more than 24 hours after Madeleine's disappearance, cleaners at the holiday complex had washed the sheets, blankets, and pillowcase," effectively destroying any and all evidence that may have been left behind (Allen, 2007). Two days after Madeleine's disappearance, Portuguese authorities finally release a sketch of the suspect and "reveal they believe Madeleine was abducted but is still alive and in Portugal" (Madeleine McCann: timeline of her disappearance, 2013). In October, the McCanns release…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Allen, V. (2007, 16 November). Madeleine: How the police ruined the forensic evidence in her bedroom. The Daily Mail Online. Accessed 19 August 2013, from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-494203/Madeleine-How-police-ruined-forensic-evidence-bedroom.html

Gammell, C. (2007, 5 September). Madeleine police handed forensic evidence. The Telegraph. Accessed 19 August 2013, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1562217/Madeleine-police-handed-forensic-evidence.html

Grice, E. (2013, 15 April). Kate McCann: 'It's dreadful living with this void.' The Telegraph.

Accessed 19 August 2013, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/9995377/Kate-McCann-Its-dreadful-living-with-this-void.html
Accessed 19 August 2013, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/timeline/10159772/Madeleine-McCann-timeline-of-her-disappearance.html
(2007, 11 September). Fox News. Accessed 19 August 2013, from http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,296371,00.html


Cite this Document:

"Madeleine Mccann Case" (2013, August 20) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/madeleine-mccann-case-94865

"Madeleine Mccann Case" 20 August 2013. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/madeleine-mccann-case-94865>

"Madeleine Mccann Case", 20 August 2013, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/madeleine-mccann-case-94865

Related Documents

Eyewitness Testimony The Supreme Court, in Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 93 S. Ct. 375 (1972), set out some guidelines as to what a court must consider when it is trying to determine how much credibility to give to eyewitness testimony. This case involved a woman who identified a man who she claimed had raped her. The case revolved around the credibility of her identification. The Court laid out the

41+). Loftus notes that science has found "post-event information" is integrated into what most people have actually experienced because, "when people experience some actual event -- say a crime or an accident -- they often later acquire new information about the event. This new information can contaminate the memory" (Loftus, 2002, March, p. 41+). In addition, many false memories are created, deliberately or by accident, in response to leading questioning

Eyewitness Testimony Current Event in Criminal Justice The Reliability of Eyewitness Testimony The execution of Troy Anthony Davis on September 27, 2011, in Georgia has stirred new debate over the reliability of eyewitness testimony. Davis was convicted of the August 19, 1989 murder of police officer Mark MacPhail in Savannah, Georgia. Working a security guard at a Burger King, MacPhail was shot when he attempted to defend a man being assaulted in a

Thus while an interviewer may simply be trying to pin down additional details of an incident (for example), the eyewitness may believe that she or he is being challenged about the accuracy of his or her memory and statement and begin (again, most likely unconsciously and not in any attempt to commit perjury) to shift answers to coincide with what the witness believes the interviewer want to hear (Poole

Eyewitness Testimony and Memory Issues When investigating and prosecuting crimes and other incidents, their can be a heavy level of reliance on eyewitness testimony to substantiate the facts that are suggested by other evidence and to fill in missing gaps in the story of the crime, accident, or other incident. This can be a problem, however, as two different eyewitness accounts of the same incident are likely to differ significantly

Law enforcement has a direct ethical responsibility to preventing wrongful convictions, no matter how heavy the pressure for a conviction may be from a political standpoint. Wrongful convictions represent a miscarriage of justice and draw attention to procedural problems in law enforcement. One of the problems that has been shown to lead to wrongful convictions is the method by which eyewitness testimony is secured. Recent criminal justice policy and procedure