Medical Records Software Comparison
Electronic Medical Records Software Comparative Analysis
There are over 75 different vendors of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) software applications currently providing solutions to healthcare facilities in the U.S. alone as of 2011 (Ulutas, Ulutas, Nabiyev, 2011). The key design criteria for EMR systems is security (Neupert, Mundie, 2009), usability (James, Garrett, Krevit, 2009) and the ability to be integrated with legacy systems (Agarwal, Milch, Van Kuiken, 2009). This comparison includes AllScripts, ChartLogic and eClinicalWorks, three of the leading EMR software application providers offering software suites today.
Comparative Analysis of EMR Software Applications
All three applications are first compared in terms of how these companies are delivering them, whether it is through licensed software or over the Internet via the Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) model. Each of these applications also supports databases, requires an operating system, and has varying degrees of functionality and performance. All are HIPAA complaint, which is a major requirement of the U.S. government for all reporting systems (Ulutas, Ulutas,...
The minimum hardware requirements, pricing, costs, and storage requirements are all included as well.
AllScripts, ChartLogic and eClinicalWorks are all delivered on licensed software models. Clinics, hospitals and treatment centers can install each of these applications on their servers, and also precisely configure them to their unique needs. Of these three, only ChartLogic also has a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) option that allows for clinics., hospitals and treatment centers to subscribe to the software application like a person subscribers to a telephone or cable service. Charges are billed monthly and the application is delivered over the Internet via any browser. This approach to software distribution has the advantage of providing applications that are highly configurable over the Internet, easily customized and accessible, and cost-effective as only the portion of the application used generates a monthly fee (James, Garrett, Krevit, 2009). The disadvantage of this approach is the security and compliance to HIPAA standards, which can become expensive over time (Agarwal, Milch, Van Kuiken, 2009). As a result, SaaS-based EMR records management systems online can often be more expensive to lease and configure compared to their licensed counterparts. Each of the applications compared also support Microsoft SQL Server integration, medical labs integration across thirteen different standards, and all three also require the Windows NT Server or XP Server operating systems. All also require an Intel-based system with a minimum of 2GB of storage and 4GB memory and a TCP/IP network interface card included.
All three applications…
Software Electronic medical records software is becoming a crucial component of healthcare administration. Gulf View Associates and Sarasota Outpatient Clinic should certainly consider one of the following three medical software systems: Medisoft Clinical, MEDENT Chart Central, and McKesson EHR. These three software systems are designed to streamline medical recordkeeping and other administrative work. One of the primary functions of electronic health records (EHR) software is to "reduce costs by improving quality,
Software Application Process for a Clinician Provider Order Entry (CPOE) system Software Application Process Clinician Provider Order Entry (CPOE) System The planning, customization, launch and continued use of a Clinician Provider Order Entry (CPOE) system in a local hospital forms the foundation of this analysis. The processes being used prior to the systems' planning and implementation are detailed to provide a basis of comparison of system contribution and performance. A timeline of the
Most commonly used functions are easy to find in the menus. However, some features such as trying to select text may be tricky for some users to locate at first. Another factor is the value of the software. This area rates at a 5. While the software has many useful features, there are many alternatives available with much lower price tags. Adobe's name recognition allows them to charge higher prices
All three systems typically require a practice to install the EHR software onto on-site servers, although they all appear to require only standard "off-the-shelf" hardware, and all of them also offer Application Service Provider (ASP) access as an option. (McKesson, 2010, General Electric Corporation, 2010, Sage 2010). Because all three systems are applications that reside on the practice's hardware, back-up of the server data seems to fall on the shoulders
Electronic Certificates of Medical Necessity: A Proposal Medical billing can now become a relatively painless process for the personal in a medical facility through the electronic filing of certificates of medical necessity (e-CMN). Manually filling out paperwork is very time consuming, and is not very cost effective. However, the technological advancements created in the area of medical billing are very efficient. While many offices now fax the CMN's, the incorporation of
In case of referrals, the physicians are able to share information with ease allowing a more accurate diagnosis to be made and the sending of reports between the two physicians becomes easy since it is electronic. In these ways, electronic medical records systems help physicians and healthcare organization to improve the quality of care provided to patients as well as improving the relationship between the patient and the physician