Microsoft Windows File Systems: Comparison And Contrast Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
1164
Cite

Microsoft Windows File Systems: Comparison and Contrast The standard versions of Windows use three types of file systems: FAT, exFAT, and NTFS. Windows 8 server also uses ReFS. The 8 server (Windows Server 2012) is the only version that uses that type of file system, as the other versions of Windows are not able to boot from that type of file system at all. In order to better understand these file systems, it is very important to compare and contrast what they have to offer. Since the ReFS files are only used by Windows 8 server, they will be discussed first. Then the information can move on toward the more commonly used files within the Windows system.

ReFS is a file type used only for Windows 8 server. It stands for Resilient File System, and was designed to be for file servers only (Russinovich, Solomon, & Ionescu, 2009). It is similar to NTFS, but improves upon that file system in several key ways. The reliability that is seen with on-disc structures is much better with ReFS, for example. B+ trees are used for file data and metadata. 64-bit numbers limit the number of files, along with the total volume size, the file size, the number of files that can fit into a directory, and also the number of directories that make up a volume. Maximum file size is 16 Exabytes, with a maximum total volume size of 1 Yottabyte that contains clusters of 64 Kilobytes each (Porter, et al., 2009; Russinovich, Solomon, & Ionescu, 2009). That allows a large scalability but put no practical limits on the directory and file sizes. The only limitations come from the hardware side of the equation. Resilience is built in to the file system, and new system APIs are not needed in order...

...

Many of the NTFS and Windows features are supported by ReFS, as well, making its use easier for the clients who change over to Windows 8 server.
The FAT (File Allocation Table) file type is among the most common kinds of files used. Nearly all operating systems that are in use today on personal computers of any kind will support this file type. All versions of Windows can and do use FAT for a large number of applications. It is a very good format for exchange, since it is nearly universal. FAT has been expanding since its beginning as FAT12. It is currently FAT32, and may change again in the future. Codepage support, subdirectories, long filenames, and other attributes have been added to FAT as it has grown and changed (Carrier, 2005; Giampaolo, 1999; Mitchell, 1997). FAT12 and FAT16 were both very limited versions of this type of file, because they limited the entries that could appear within the root directory (Custer, 1994; McCoy, 1990). Disks or partitions that were FAT-formatted also had size restrictions. When FAT32 came out, it addressed many of those issues with the exception of a file size limit which is still 4 Gigabytes (Nagar, 1997; Pate, 2003; Silberschatz, Galvin, & Gagne, 2004). FAT is limited when compared to NTFS, but because it is so widely used and so interchangeable among various types of personal computers, there is little chance that FAT will be abandoned as a file type at any point in the near future.

Another file type, exFAT, is patent-protected because it is a proprietary system (Russinovich, Solomon, & Ionescu, 2009). When it comes to the file system overhead, there are benefits to exFAT over FAT…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Carrier, B. (2005). File System Forensic Analysis. NY: Addison-Wesley.

Custer, H. (1994). Inside the Windows NT File System. CA: Microsoft Press.

Giampaolo, D. (1999) (PDF). Practical File System Design with the Be File System. NY: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

McCoy, K. (1990). VMS File System Internals. VAX-VMS Series. NY: Digital Press.


Cite this Document:

"Microsoft Windows File Systems Comparison And Contrast" (2012, August 26) Retrieved June 13, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/microsoft-windows-file-systems-comparison-81782

"Microsoft Windows File Systems Comparison And Contrast" 26 August 2012. Web.13 June. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/microsoft-windows-file-systems-comparison-81782>

"Microsoft Windows File Systems Comparison And Contrast", 26 August 2012, Accessed.13 June. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/microsoft-windows-file-systems-comparison-81782

Related Documents

The Windows operating system architecture also allows for single sign-on and also relies on user name and password verification. The authentication process for a Windows operating system at the server level can also be configured to validate the identity of the person logging in at the Windows domain and Microsoft Active Directory Service levels as well. Certificates can be assigned to specific applications, databases and processes within a Windows sever-based

Windows CE: Compare/Contrast Linux and Windows XP Windows CE Windows CE (consumer electronics), as the name indicates is Microsoft's embedded operating system specially developed for many types of consumer electronic gadgets like PDA's, industrial controllers and other mobile communication devices. It is in a true sense a multitasking and multithreading operating system and hence allows for two applications to be run at the same time. The first version of Windows CE had

The main advantage of a system without GUI is higher reliability, resulted by fewer working components, as each of them may crash the whole system. For example Windows platforms cannot work because of a corrupted display driver, which is impossible in Linux configuration without GUI. Another advantage of Linux is ability to create scenarios for a number of administrating tasks and running them in command mode. Because of the

Microsoft Anti-Trust
PAGES 5 WORDS 2266

Microsoft Anti-Trust Issues Issues in anti-trust cases tend to be very complex and technical, but in the case of the government vs. Microsoft, they are quite understandable. The government alleged that Microsoft used predatory pricing tactics to destroy competitors and eliminate competition in the marketplace. They were also accused of erecting technical barriers within their operating systems to make it difficult or impossible for non-Microsoft software to run on Windows. In

It also offered a relatively faster booting experience than its predecessors. This OS was widely accepted and became the standard OS for workstations in the industry and the personal computers at home. For Windows Vista, although it was earlier stated that it would be much more reliable and secure than any other previous versions of Windows, it was not well received by the it professionals and the industry for

Windows 7 Operating System vs. Ubuntu Linux Operating System. Windows and Linux have sustained a head-to-head competitive race. Whilst Windows 7 is the premier and best selling operating system for personal desktop use, Linux, and Linux Ubuntu included, has achieved a reputation as the most prominent Free Software and Open Source operating system. Individuals -- such as I - prefer Windows due to better consumer familiarity, whilst other individuals, on