Moral Principles Utilitarianism Kantian Ethics Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
996
Cite

¶ … prostitution is a dirty word. Yet governments support it and benefit from it. This paper discusses prostitution in light of Kantian ethics and Mill's utilitarianism. MORAL PRINCIPLES:

UTILITARIANISM vs. KANTIAN ETHICS

To every decision there are always two sides attached; one that advocates an absolute standard and the other that questions this standard. Similarly when faced by a moral dilemma, one solution is to do in accordance with absolute moral standards and the other is to weigh the consequences and do in accordance with them. The first allows the assurance that the decision will be absolutely correct in terms absolute morality; however it may harm the parties involved. The second practice ensures that once the consequences are weighed and judged and the decision acted upon, it is going to benefit more people but would harm some. However in event of the second choice, there is no assurance that the decision is morally correct. It is the former that was supported by Immanuel Kant and the latter by John Stuart Mill. Kant supported the concept of absolute morality that could serve as a universal law under all circumstances for all times to come. On the other hand, Mill advocated the concept of utilitarianism, arguing that the morality of each action is to be judged in terms of favorable or unfavorable consequences that result from that action; if the resultant costs are less in comparison with the resultant benefits, then an action is justifiable even if it does not meet the absolute...

...

Therefore it can be stated that Kantian ethics are based on three considerations; the first one demands that if an action does not establish a universal moral law, it is unethical. The second one states that morality should serve as the end in itself and not as means. And the third one demands that if an action does not abide by a universal law but is subject to subjective analysis, the action is unethical.
PROSTITUTION: A MORAL/ETHICAL ISSUE

The act of prostitution presents one such dilemma where by Kantian ethics, it cannot serve as a morally correct universal law but that it is subject to circumstances. However under the concept of utilitarianism, prostitution is justifiable if the costs of the action are less than the benefits received.

Prostitution can be defined as performance of sexual acts for the sole purpose of material gain. Prostitutes can belong to either gender but women are more often the ones who take up this act as a profession usually under economic stress. Prostitution is condemned on the grounds of three-tiered Kantian ethics. Firstly under Kantian ethics, prostitution is an action where bodies are used as means to attain something. Since Kant advocated that an action should serve as an end and not as means, Prostitution would receive severe criticism on this ground. Secondly if morality behind the act of prostitution is subject to analysis and judgment, then the act is not moral at all since Kantian ethics state that an action cannot be…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Author Not Available. Prostitution. Asiaweek: February 7, 1997

Lambert, Bruce. AIDS in Prostitutes, Not as Prevalent as Believed, Studies Find; New York Times: September 20, 1988.

Saikaew, Ladda. The Report on Child Prostitution as a Form of Forced Labor: A Non-Governmental Organization Perspective. Office of Publications; Department of Labor, 1997.


Cite this Document:

"Moral Principles Utilitarianism Kantian Ethics" (2002, November 08) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/moral-principles-utilitarianism-kantian-138265

"Moral Principles Utilitarianism Kantian Ethics" 08 November 2002. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/moral-principles-utilitarianism-kantian-138265>

"Moral Principles Utilitarianism Kantian Ethics", 08 November 2002, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/moral-principles-utilitarianism-kantian-138265

Related Documents

In this light, the individual is given emphasis in the senses that, if one individual's life is compromised, say in order to find a cure for a disease; Kantian ethics would heavily oppose this approach. Utilitarianism, on the other hand would accept the measure. Both Kant's moral principles and his theory of human nature are designed only to add to our discontent with ourselves. For Kant, the task of philosophy

Powell points to the fact that "in Georgia, for example, the time between the date of the murder and the murderer's execution (if it occurs) averages close to I0 years 25 Although the average lapsed time in Georgia may be the highest, the same situation generally prevails in a number of other states. No one would suggest that this is satisfactory." (Powell, 1038) Indeed, according to Calvert (1993) it demonstrates

Ethics and Rights
PAGES 4 WORDS 1347

right, a legal right, a moral right, a human right. How are they related? Rights are privileges or entitlements to perform particular actions, or to be in particular state/situations; or privileges/entitlements to carry out certain actions or be in particular states. Rights are the cornerstone of the modern comprehension of what actions are allowed or permissible and which institutions are fair and just. Rights structure the content of laws, the

Ethics in Public SafetyIntroductionEthics support the right functioning of public safety, as they can define both the goals and the proper or moral ways to achieving those goals. This paper discusses the �big� three primary ethical frameworks: Deontological, Teleological, and Virtue Ethics. The focus of this paper is on their premises, the philosophical proponents of each, how they have been refined by philosophers over time, the criticisms each has faced,

Deontological theory might criticize Guido's choice if the initial assumptions included the rule prohibiting lying. However, deontological analysis is only as useful as the underlying rules with respect to which it is applied. Therefore, the solution to the deontological issues raised by the issue presented by the movie is simply to reformulate a less restrictive rule that is incapable of being applied to every situation. Instead of proposing the rule

Utilitarianism and Deontology John Stuart Mill's theory of Utilitarianism and Immanuel Kant's Deontological theory approach the question of ethics from diametrically opposite points-of-view: "Consequentialist theories...try to ground moral judgments in human well-being. Kantian theories...try to ground moral judgments in the rational nature of the moral subject, whose inherent dignity they emphasize." (Aune & Berger, p. 125) It is the objective of this paper to briefly explain and compare the two theories. Mill's