NASA Budgetary Analysis Payroll Forecast As with any massive bureaucratic entity in which thousands of employees work collaboratively on hundreds of individual projects, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) devotes a healthy percentage of its annual budget to maintaining its permanent and temporary workforce. With an annual operating budget...
Writing a literature review is a necessary and important step in academic research. You’ll likely write a lit review for your Master’s Thesis and most definitely for your Doctoral Dissertation. It’s something that lets you show your knowledge of the topic. It’s also a way...
NASA Budgetary Analysis Payroll Forecast As with any massive bureaucratic entity in which thousands of employees work collaboratively on hundreds of individual projects, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) devotes a healthy percentage of its annual budget to maintaining its permanent and temporary workforce.
With an annual operating budget of approximately $17.8 billion for fiscal year 2013, calculating the exact amount paid as compensation to employees is a difficult prospect, but using conservative estimates which take into account budget items like Space Operations ($4 billion) and Cross-Agency Support ($2.8 billion), it is likely that NASA spends well in excess of $12 billion per year on salaries, pensions, and other employee-generated costs.
This figure aligns with previous estimates made by NASA in fiscal year 2006, when the agency stated in its annual NASA Office of the Inspector General budget request that "82.7% of the proposed budget is dedicated to personnel and related costs, including salaries, benefits, monetary awards, worker's compensation, transportation subsidies and training, as well as the government's contributions for Social Security, Medicare, health and life insurance, retirement accounts, matching contributions to Thrift Savings Plan accounts, the required 25% law enforcement availability pay for criminal investigators, and permanent change of station costs." With the federal government already targeting NASA for budget cuts in the wake of a devastating and prolonged recession, the notion of instituting a pay raise for employees, whether it be 2%, 4%, or 5%, would appear to be a nonstarter.
As a hypothetical exercise, however, it is clear that increasing salaries, both as a reward for NASA's tenured employees and as an incentive for the brightest scientific minds to work for America's space exploration agency, would prove to provide substantial benefits. As renowned astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson recently wrote in testimony provided to the U.S.
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, "right now, NASA's annual budget is half a penny on your tax dollar & #8230; (but) for twice that -- a penny on a dollar -- we can transform the country from a sullen, dispirited nation, weary of economic struggle, to one where it has reclaimed its 20th century birthright to dream of tomorrow" (2012).
Lofty abstractions aside, it stands to reason that the productivity of an agency like NASA could be noticeably increased by virtue of the pay raises described above, because when considered in conjunction with NASA's existing mandate to streamline its operations and mandate efficiency, they funds would likely be allocated appropriately. 2. Trend Analysis During the last five years the federal government has been forced to reckon with certain inescapable economic realities, and as such the portion of the federal budget dedicated to NASA has trended downward during this time.
As part of the agency's ongoing effort to tighten the proverbial belt, eliminating inefficient or outdated programs while diverting resources to more fruitful projects, NASA's total expenditures have decreased slightly during the last five years, but prestigious initiatives such as the Space Shuttle have been shuttered. The following chart depicts NASA's budget history as a percentage of the total federal budget, and it is quite evident that the agency's budgetary health is trending in a decidedly downward direction: 3.
Expenditure Forecast After drastically reducing its budget for the operation of its iconic Space Shuttle fleet, from $556 million in fiscal year 2012 to just $70.6 million this year, this major expenditure is scheduled to come off of the books in fiscal year 2014. Perhaps concurrently, NASA's expected budget for its involvement with the International Space Station will increase slightly during each of the next five years, moving from $2.8 billion in fiscal year 2012 to $3.2 billion in fiscal year 2017.
Another major expenditure that NASA is planning to absorb during the next five years is the controversial James Webb Space Telescope, which is tentatively expected to launch in 2018. Having garnered negative attention due to a regrettable series of scheduling mishaps and cost overruns, the James Webb Space Telescope is budgeted for $518 million this year, with increases to $627 million (fiscal year 2013), $659 million (fiscal year 2014), $646 million (fiscal year 2015), $621 million (fiscal year 2016).
The third most impactful expenditure within NASA's budget is Center Management and Operations, which cost the agency a $2.2 billion this year and is forecasted to cost $2.09 billion during the next five fiscal years. Finally, NASA has invested $3.7 billion to fund Exploration Systems Development, which is ostensibly dedicated to creating America's next generation of manned space vehicles, as well as a new fleet of unmanned planetary exploration devices.
This expenditure is expected to rise to $3.9 billion during the next fiscal year, while reaching $4.07 billion during each of the next four fiscal years. 4. Capital Budget In the event that NASA elected to refurbish the lighting system of its administration.
The remaining sections cover Conclusions. Subscribe for $1 to unlock the full paper, plus 130,000+ paper examples and the PaperDue AI writing assistant — all included.
Always verify citation format against your institution's current style guide.