Bleidorn, W., Kandler, C., Hulsheger, U.R., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. The stated purpose of the study is to disentangle the genetic and environmental influences that exist as it relates to personality and why people tend to act the way that they do. They concede that different types of stability and change need to be considered to get the entire picture of the patterns and sources of personality development that exist (Bleidorn, Kandler, Riemann, Angleitner & Spinath, 2012).
M. (2010). Nature and nurture of the interplay between personality traits and major life goals. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 99(2), 366-379.
The first article is written by Bleidorn and a few other authors. Per the title, it pertains to the interplay and correlation between a person's personality traits and their life goals as they progress through life. The author's thesis centers on a question asked by a research study done about fifteen years ago when it was asked whether or what the conceptual relationship between personality traits and goals happens to be. The introductory statement also talks about how motivational constructive have long been considered part and parcel of a person's personality and how the personality then manifests and displays (Bleidorn et al., 2010).
The article goes on to talk about major life goals using the prism and lens of agency and communion. There is then reference to the interplay that might or might not exist between traits and goals and how this all relates to theories of personality. The study notes that the NST points to four core components, those being tarits, motives, abilities and narratives. The method and measures of the study are covered next. The first table of the study shows rates of things like neuroticism, extraversion, openness and other personality traits. The study then goes through its multiple points of analysis and review. One finding of the analysis revealed that agentic goals were positively related to extraversion, openness and conscientiousness (Bleidorn et al., 2010).
The study concludes with a discussion about what was covered and analyzed up to that point in the study. As part of that conclusion, there is a section about the refining of the phenotypic picture. There are some questions posed including how heritable major life goals happen to be, the unique genetic effects that render, the common environmental effects on the "Big Five" and/or major life goals in general, and whether there are cross-time effects between the "Big Five" and the major life goals. Limitations and future directions of research are found at the end of the study (Bleidorn et al., 2010).
Bleidorn, W., Kandler, C., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F.M. (2012). Genetic
and Environmental Influences on Personality Profile Stability: Unraveling the Normativeness Problem. Journal of Personality, 80(4), 1029-1060.
The second study reviewed in this ...
The authors of this new study then touch upon a lot of the work of prior authors that explored the same or similar subjects. These names include van Aken, Hale, Meeus and others. The authors then talk about personal profile stability and how it is a single construct that takes on multiple labels. Indeed, they cite that there are many differences and iterations of personality and they wish to find the genesis of such differences and variations. They then talk about the personality profile stability and the normative-ness problem. The latter refers to the paradigm and lens that clouds and complicates the findings that would otherwise be found. The complexity of the paradigm and the analysis that occurs leads to a muddying of the conclusions that can be drawn (Bleidorn, Kandler, Riemann, Angleitner & Spinath, 2012).
The authors then get into the present study. They use a multi-rater twin approach to personality profile stability. They discuss the method, the data analyses, the biometrics and so forth. They conclude the study with the results. One thing that came to light is that self-review was often quite different than peer review of the same person and it varied based on the incident and timing of the analysis. In the discussion, they note that people that grow up in a relatively stable household tend to be able to adjust and change their personality scope as needed. They also note that genes play a huge role. In short, they suggest that both nature and nurture play major roles in what makes a person what they are from a personality standpoint (Bleidorn, Kandler, Riemann, Angleitner & Spinath, 2012).
Torgersen, S. (2009). The nature (and nurture) of personality disorders.
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(6), 624-632.
The third and final source used for this report is from a different author entirely and specifically covers one dimension of personalities and that would be personality disorder and dysfunction. As noted early on in the study, personality disorders manifest in the form of choleric, melancholic, hysteric, libidinal, character and neurotic issues, among many others. The prevalence of such personality disorders are covered next. It is admitted and conceded that many people with depressive and anxiety issues also have personality disorders that are comorbid with those depression and anxiety issues, thus complicating…
The stated purpose of the study is to disentangle the genetic and environmental influences that exist as it relates to personality and why people tend to act the way that they do. They concede that different types of stability and change need to be considered to get the entire picture of the patterns and sources of personality development that exist (Bleidorn, Kandler, Riemann, Angleitner & Spinath, 2012).
Nurture Wins Nature/Nurture The debate of nature vs. nurture has persisted with intensity over time. Some scholars contend that this debate can be traced back to the times of ancient Greece. In the debate, nature may be referred to as nativism, or innatism. The side of nature contends that a person's natural, in-born, or innate qualities have more of an influence over the person's life. Nurture refers to personal experience, context, and
Personality and Leadership Personality most certainly has an impact on a person's leadership style, effectiveness, and overall competence. And clearly the personality traits shown by leaders impact underlings and employees in numerous ways. In this paper personality -- as linked to leadership skills and styles -- will be viewed through scholarly references and research. Also, the issue of nature vs. nurture will be reviewed and critiqued as well. What is Personality? The New
Personality Analysis Life History Like most people, I have experienced ups and downs, highs and lows. The major upheavals in my life have revealed some of the core personality traits that have been with me since childhood. I believe that crisis and stress challenge us, and also bring to light our true selves. However, I also believe strongly in the power of each person to change. I used to have anger management
Nature vs. nurture debate has been the center of discussion for many years. Some believe that human behavior is created naturally while others believe that human behavior evolves over time. The purpose of this discussion is to discuss both sides of issue and to develop an opinion about which side seems more accurate. Let's begin our discussion by explaining the nature vs. nurture debate. Nature vs. Nurture The first recorded experiment concerning nature
That is simply because individual in the same family are much more likely than unrelated individuals to share similar foundational experiences by virtue of their exposure to similar parenting and resources in their immediate environment throughout their early lives (Gerrig & Zimbardo, 2007; Rutter, 2006). Just as Rhesus monkeys tend to adopt maternal behaviors and elements of personalities of their mothers irrespective of their genetic inclinations, so do human infants
Personality Development in Immigrant Children Personality development is one of the most commonly researched areas of psychology. At first blush, the relation between personality and the cognitive development of immigrant children may appear somewhat nebulous. However, as contemporary research moves ever closer to an integrative approach, the fields of social and biological science -- once regarded as discrete disciplines -- are merging like the overlapping disks of a Venn diagram. The cognitive