Thesis Undergraduate 2,919 words

Octagon Football: Sports Law

Last reviewed: March 23, 2014 ~15 min read
Abstract

Abstract This text analyses the legal environment of a sporting organization. The organization selected for purposes of this discussion is Octagon Football. Amongst other things, the text will highlight some of the specific legal issues and concepts that have an effect on not only the operational, but also the managerial aspects of Octagon Football and similar organizations.

Sports Law

Unlike was the case a few decades ago, sports has today become a multi-million dollar industry. It is this exponential growth in the 'business of sports' that has informed the growing interest in sports law. The legal issues that, in one way or another, relate to sports typically range from intellectual property to torts to contracts and many others. In seeking to explore the various legal issues in the sports industry, this text concerns itself with the legal environment of a typical sports organization. The organization of choice for purposes of this discussion is Octagon Sports/Octagon Football.

A sports marketing agency with global presence, Octagon could easily be one of the largest sponsorship consulting outfits in the world. Typically, sports marketing firms like Octagon Football concern themselves with not only the creation but also the maximization of commercial opportunities for clients. In addition to working with scores of athletes, Octagon also works with hundreds of corporations, most of them blue-chip entities. One of the key entities Octagon has worked with in the past, according to the organization's president is FIFA (Robinson, 2008). Octagon also manages numerous events annually. One of the key goals of the athlete marketing department of Octagon is the creation and maximization of each of its client's off-field corporate engagements or relationships. In the final analysis, therefore, Octagon Football is of great relevance to players seeking to have their earning potential further enhanced throughout their playing careers.

Being one of the most visible and successful athlete representation entities, Octagon Football, like any other sporting outfit of its kind, is exposed to a variety of legal issues and concerns that have an effect on both its operational and managerial aspects. In addition to being actively involved in contract negotiations, Octagon Football also engages numerous other stakeholders in the industry as it seeks to create unique athlete brands. Ideally, an organization like Octagon Football ought to be aware of the various competitive challenges it could face and how to deal with them. Amongst other things, it must be aware that capitalizing on the success of other players in the sports entertainment realm could result in violations of common law, in which case it might find itself being accused of 'free-riding' or 'passing off.' Similarly, the company must protect itself from the unfair moves and practices of other players in the sports entertainment arena.

Sports Management, Promotion and Marketing: Legal Issues and Concepts

According to Jones (2011), in the past, there is no single area of law that comprised of the United States sports law. As the author further points out, traditionally, U.S. sports law has "comprised the more traditional areas of labor law, antitrust, tort law, contracts law, and others" (Jones 2011). Therefore, in the opinion of the author, the development of sports law as a unique legal concept has given rise to enhanced focus on the special components of sports law. Based on the nature of my sports organization of choice, I will in this text highlight contracts, intellectual property rights, and publicity rights and privacy rights.

Contracts

The nature of sports and sporting events management dictates that emphasis be placed on the various provisions of contract law, especially given that negotiations are, in this case, commonplace. From the onset, it is important to note that the various provisions governing the entry into, and enforcement of contracts are found in common law, the Uniform Commercial Code, and both federal and state laws. As numerous legal texts point out, there are various elements that ought to be present for a contract to be viewed as being valid. These include; an offer, acceptance of the said offer, obligation, and consideration. In any contract scenario, whether in sporting or elsewhere, an individual (to whom an offer is made) has several courses of action: he or she could reject, deny, or make what is referred to as a counter offer. The offerer (the individual making the offer) also has the ability to revoke the offer. The offer could also be voided by the incapacitation or death of a party to the said contract. Like is the case in most undertakings of a commercial nature, contracts in sporting engagements are binding. This is particularly the case once the elements I have highlighted above are present and once the parties to the offer agree on the terms as set therein. In that regard, therefore, if either party vacates or neglects its duties and obligations as per the terms of the contract, the offended party has legal backing, in which case the remedies offered could include monetary damages. Most contracts according to Jones (2011) also include what the author refers to as an arbitration clause. Such a clause according to the author "requires the contracting parties to resolve disputes either by mediation or arbitration" (Jones, 2011). Some of the most critical considerations as far as contracts in the Octagon Football's legal environment are concerned will be addressed in the sections below. They include athlete personal service agreements, licensing agreements, and publicity releases.

To begin with, when it comes to athlete personal service agreements, it is important to note that sporting organizations ought to take into consideration the role of various athletic governing bodies prior to commencing contractual engagements. It is only in those circumstances when it if fair to do so should negotiations on this front proceed. As much as it could be a prerequisite, ensuring that all the athletes actively engaged with an entity like Octagon Football are placed under contract could be an excellent strategic move. This is particularly the case given that such a move makes it extremely difficult for competitors in the same business to access such stars, and their services. For an entity like Octagon that lists maximization of client off-field relationships (particularly corporate) as one of its key goals, the relevance of negotiating for the inclusion of merchandising rights in the athlete personal service agreement cannot be overstated. This is more so the case given that as Blackshaw (2010) points out, "sports merchandising is an integral part of the sports marketing mix." Octagon Football might also, from time to time, find itself negotiating certain agreements on behalf of its clients. Negotiations could in such a case fall under personal service agreements. Athletes must commit to a publicity release condition as a personal service agreement condition. This is meant to ensure that transfer of their property rights most particularly in their likenesses, images, and personalities has legal backing. This is particularly important for organizations like Octagon Football that engage in sports marketing. As I have already pointed out elsewhere in this text, Octagon Sports is a leader when it comes to the maximization of the corporate relationships (off-field) of clients. Octagon Football would need publicity releases for not only the telecast but also the promotion of clients. Athletes affiliated to professional teams could in some cases be bound by their club's bylaws and employment contracts. This is something organizations like Octagon Football ought to be aware of. In such a case, publicity releases could be arranged with the relevant parties.

Licensing agreements, on the other hand, allow for the association between the service marks and trademarks goodwill of the licensor with the corporate service or product of the licensee. As Moorman and Hambrick (2009) observe, the sports licensing industry is huge. Apart from the licensing provisions typically included in sponsorship agreements, licensing agreements could also be granted to a franchisee (by a franchisor) for the utilization of intellectual copyrights and trade secrets. Nonexclusive licenses could also be issued to broadcasters (by the owner of an event) to not only record, but also engage in the distribution of telecasts. In most cases, it is a sporting entity's negotiation skills that determine the outcome of the various agreements of a contractual nature.

Intellectual Property Rights

Essentially, the overriding purpose of intellectual property rights is the promotion of innovation and creativity. Because of its nature and activities, modern sports marketing cannot thrive outside the legal framework governing intellectual property rights. The power to enact copyright, Patent, and trademark laws in the U.S. is vested on Congress. It should be noted that as long as they do not seek to make use of intellectual property laws in the creation, exercise or sustenance of what is referred to as market power, companies like Octagon Football can greatly benefit from intellectual property rights and the exclusivity arrangements they bring fourth. Otherwise, they risk antitrust litigation. Effectively, given that intellectual property rights seek to prevent other entities from making use of the protected works of other parties, sports organizations such as Octagon Football are in this case provided with yet another avenue to generate profits -- i.e. By way of licensing such rights to other entities through merchandising, broadcasting, or even franchise arrangements. Intellectual property rights could be discussed in the context of trade names, trade secrets, and service marks and trademarks.

As it has already been pointed out elsewhere in this text, service marks and trademarks come in handy in the identification (and hence distinction) of services and products, respectively (Harris 2012). When it comes to the identification of specific individuals, organizations, or enterprises, trade names are used. For organizations like Octagon that are routinely engaged in athlete marketing, the subject of trade names cannot be avoided. The names of players, including their nicknames (if they are deemed to be well established) can be trademarked. Indeed, within the last few years, the number of athletes seeking to secure trademark registrations from the federal government for their images and names has gone up (Goins, 2012). When developing service marks or trademarks for sporting events, Octagon Football must, therefore, at all times ensure that such marks are distinguished from those of entities it does not have special arrangements with. On the other hand, the organization must also take deliberate steps to ensure that its brand, activities, and events are unique.

Next are trade secrets. In basic terms, trade secrets include, but that are not limited to, the various techniques, strategies, processes, or even methods that are of significant economic value to an entity, and whose disclosure therefore could be injurious to the interests of the said entity. In that regard therefore, information in the public domain cannot be classified as a trade secret. From an economic perspective, a business could lose its competitive advantage if its trade secrets are disclosed. If Octagon Football, for example, takes the necessary precautions to protect such information as financial data, formal event plans, marketing strategies etc., then such information could be afforded the protection accorded to trade secrets. However, for such protection to be effective, there is need for an organization like Octagon Football to incorporate the relevant non-disclosure clauses into the specific arrangements it has with licensees or other parties. It should, however, be noted that it is possible to license methods or specific ways of doing things to others. A sports league could, for example, license trade secrets to member clubs.

Third, we have service marks and trademarks. Harris (2012) defines trademarks as any graphic symbol, logo or even word/phrase that a seller or manufacturer makes use of in an attempt to distinguish they own items from those of others. Trademarks are, based on the definition above, meant to differentiate brands. The key difference between trademarks and service marks therefore is, while trademarks largely apply to products, service marks mainly apply to services (Harris 2012). The protection service marks are accorded is similar to that extended to trademarks. Organizations like Octagon Football ought to be aware of laws relating to service marks and trademarks. This is more so the case given that for such organizations, service marks and trademarks are critical advertising and marketing tools. For instance, the relevance of trademarks and service marks cannot be overstated when it comes to not only the promotion of sporting events but also the enhancement of team loyalty.

Publicity Rights and Privacy Rights

This is yet another important factor in the sports and events management legal environment. Essentially, individuals have well-defined rights in their own identity. In the case of Octagon Football, such rights could touch on the right (exclusive or otherwise) to exercise charge over the personality or name of a player or client in dealings of a commercial nature. The relevance of publicity rights cannot, therefore, be overstated when it comes to the proprietary interest of an individual in a performance in which they are engaged. Should a sporting organization deprive an athlete or client their means of livelihood, it could find itself in court defending its actions as the publicity right is in this case actionable. Unauthorized commercial utilization of the likeness or name of an athlete could also be found to be in violation of their publicity rights. This is particularly the case in those instances where the overriding goal of such an action remains the enhancement of sales of a given product.

You’re 78% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
References
7 sources cited in this paper
  • Blackshaw, I. (2010). Morality Clauses in Sports Merchandising Agreements. The International Sports Law Journal, 1-2.
  • Goins. J. V. (2012). Jewel Food Stores, Inc.: Do the Shoes Make the Man? Sport Marketing Quarterly, 21(4).
  • Harris, E. (2012). Rings of Controversy: An Analysis of the 2016 Rio Olympic Games Logo Controversy. The International Sports Law Journal, 1-2.
  • Jones, K.L. (2011). Foundations of the United States Sports Law Model: Structure and Key Issues. The International Sports Law Journal, 3-4.
  • Moorman, A.M. & Hambrick, M.E. (2009). To License or Not to License: This is the Question for Professional Sports Leagues and the NCAA. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 18(3), 160.
  • Robinson, M. (2009). SQM Profile/Interview: Lisa Murray. Sports Marketing Quarterly, 17(4).
  • Williams, K. (2009). Character Sports Merchandising: International Legal Issues: The Legal and Practical Ways and Means of Protecting the Subject Matter in the UK, the Rest of Europe and Internationally. The International Sports Law Journal, 1-2.
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2014). Octagon Football: Sports Law. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/octagon-football-sports-law-185817

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.