Parson's Theories Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
670
Cite

Talcott Parson's concept of the sick role involves complicity on the part of both patient and community. The patient, once labeled as "sick," is exempt from the roles and duties expected of a healthy person, enabling a form of socially sanctioned deviance. The deviance is socially sanctioned because the physician, who is in a position of power, authorizes the sick role. Parson's sick role theory is unique because it focuses on the sociology of illness, and includes both structural and functional factors. Illness deviates from the norm practically by definition, because functional wellness is presumed to be normative. When a person becomes incapacitated in whatever way due to illness or injury, that person's behaviors, level of functioning, and usefulness to society deviate from the norm. Although Parsons evolved his sick role theory in the middle of the 20th century, it remains a potent guiding foundation for medical sociology. Sick role theory remains relevant because it can help elucidate issues related to labor relations and human resources, public policy, as well as issues that are more directly relevant to health care (Varul, 2010).

According to Parsons, the sick person has specific rights and responsibilities when assuming the sick role. All together,...

...

The responsibility to seek care and work within the structure of the medical establishment remain salient, as it would be considered doubly deviant if a sick person were to simply extricate herself from society rather than avail herself of treatment. This is why persons who refuse medical care for religious or other personal reasons are stigmatized; they are not fulfilling their responsibility as a sick person. The sick person is, however, exempt from responsibility for the illness itself. This can be problematic with illnesses caused by lifestyle choices, such as obesity or lung disease. In spite of the limitations and challenges posed by Parson's sick role theory, it remains part of the underpinning of medical sociology.
2. A physician is often expected to fulfill many intersecting roles, and those roles have become more complex than ever before. Doctors are often high profile figures, may need to work with the media, or write to an audience not of their peers but to the public. Likewise, doctors might participate in public policy, shaping the future of the health care industry and its manifold professions. Some doctors become behind -- the scenes researchers rather than working on the…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Varul, M.Z. (2010). Talcott Parsons, the sick role, and chronic illness. Body Society 16(2): 72-94.

Working Party of the Royal College of Physicians (2005). Doctors in society. Clinical Medicine 5(6).


Cite this Document:

"Parson's Theories" (2015, April 06) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/parson-theories-2150696

"Parson's Theories" 06 April 2015. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/parson-theories-2150696>

"Parson's Theories", 06 April 2015, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/parson-theories-2150696

Related Documents

371). In addition, the cultural strain can result to conflicts like for instance when the fundamentalists denies the proposition to abandon their traditions (Allan, 2005, p. 367), where the strain as an agitation of a cultural anticipation in a system, as it tries to disturb the equilibrium of the system. Considering a society characterized by different individuals that have varied backgrounds and understanding, shaped by different surroundings, and having understanding

Theories Sociology has been defined s the scientific study of human interaction and, as such, is accepted as a scientific activity (Leming 1997). Social science aims at discovering and explaining observed events of and in nature by means of a framework that can be tested. The goal of sociology is, therefore, to produce a body of knowledge that will provide not only an understanding of the causal processes influencing human behavior

Functionalist Theory: Critical Analysis A very basic and inadequate description of Functionalist Theory is that it is a social/anthropological theory that people within a society generally agree on what is worthwhile/good, and that this agreement or value forms the basis of cooperation, stability and order within that society. These values are stratified or ranked in society and allow the evaluation and ranking of individuals within society: people who are successful in

For example, Tocqueville was able to explain 18th century European aristocrat behavior by looking at social consequences. Like Tocqueville, Marx believed that they could explain individual actions by looking at subconscious class interests. Frey has demonstrated that people will accept individually negative outcomes, if they have positive group benefits. Nietzsche believed that, while conscious of class interests, individual actions and beliefs should be viewed from an individual perspective, since they

influential theories related to deviance by Robert K. Merton. Firstly, the paper provides the historical context within which the theorist produced their ideas. Secondly, the paper provides a summary of their original theory. Thirdly, the paper provides a discussion of how the model has been critiqued and altered as new research has emerged. Lastly, the paper delves into the theory's current usage/popularity within criminology. The historical context within which the

Social and Cultural Theory Study Guide Karl Marx Karl Marx was a prolific German social philosopher who is renowned for his exceptional theories related to modern socialism and communism. Marx strongly believed that the recent times have changed the value of man. According to Marx, people are no longer valued for who they are, but they are categorized assessing their importance and participation in the production of products/goods. In the present time,