Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Parties and Party Systems
The Creation and Role of Political Parties and Role Effects
In general political parties have four main relevant dimensions; government control to some degree and in some facet including legislation making and approval and nominations to electoral bids and/or nominations to nonelected positions in government, a stable base which includes mass popular or populous support, they have some internal structure that controls funding and platform and finally they are a source of information to the public. According to Katz the defining characteristics of a party include their general position as "central actors" in democratic as well as other forms of government and they are very unlikely to be replaced by "social movements or governance networks" (2008, p.294) The central role or most important dimension of a political party is its ability to control government in some fashion, the development of this aspect of the party system has to do with the development of the political party as a powerful purveyor of information and stances on political and even social issues. The party system invariably develops in cases where decisions must be made and they must be made, according to the popular support of the party "members" via party platform which is another way...
Opposition of one or more parties on issues, often determines the issues that come to the forefront for decision making as well as legislation (Ware, 2002, p. 162). Sometimes this is a good thing while other times the "competition between one or more parties drives passionate gridlock, where passions for issues overrides common sense decision making and irrational decisions get made with the corresponding legislation or policy making (p. 196). While many also claim that without completion and the debate that arises from it the issues would be decided without merit or consideration (p. 196). The other main functions of parties grow out of this primary dimension. Decisions that need to be made are often complex and nearly always in opposition to opposing party views. Katz claims that in their inception parties often grew out of representative bodies, such as parliamentary roles (2008, p. 298).
In some governments, such as the U.S. party systems develop to have two dominant opposing parties, and a host of other's with limited popular support and control of government (Sartori, 2005, p. 164). While in other governments such as the Netherlands there is more fluidity and the creation and pull of political parties seems a comparatively ongoing event, with mergers and…
References
Katz, R.S. (2008) "Political parties," in Daniele Caramani, ed., Comparative politics.
(Oxford: Oxford University Press,), pp. 293-317.
Sartori, G. (2005) Parties and party systems: a framework for analysis. Colchester, UK: University of Essex Press.
Ware, A. "The classification of party systems," Chapter 5 in book Political
Political Science in Western Europe Lipset and Rokkam's freezing hypothesis, published in the 1967, approached the political spectrum from their experiential paradigm. The party system in Europe, and indeed most of the western world, had evolved through a homogeneous process which had experiences little in the way of social upheaval. The economies of the West were based on societal evolutions form agriculture to industry which had smoothly transitioned, and formed the
The merits of the two-party system all stem from its perceived (and probably justifiably so) stability. That stability is offered by many as reason enough to avoid rocking the boat. But, as presented here, the arguments against the two-party system and, indeed, maybe against stability itself, are more persuasive. The U.S. can handle electoral dynamics associated with more than two parties, and it seems that the governing body can only
However, the system is much more representative. Thus, in the British Parliament there are representatives from the Scottish parliament as well as from the Northern Ireland Assembly. Even so, the proposals for the reform of the electoral law and program have tried to ease the access of the population to the voting system, to increase the public awareness in relation to the political representation. This would determine a better
Evolution of the Two-Party System in America Most of the founding fathers of the United States were opposed to the formation of political parties considering them as "quarreling factions" that would foster corruption and hinder the public from freely judging issues on merit. Hence no provision was made in the U.S. Constitution for political parties. Yet a two-party has come to dominate the country's politics, with the Democratic and the Republican
19th century, the federalist/anti-federalist schism dominated political discourse in the United States. The so-called "first party system" became less relevant as increasing numbers of citizens became politically active, leading to a greater plurality of voices and opinions. Even then, political parties had not yet become fully formed. Most elections had candidates running independently. However, the anti-federalists had become the Democratic-Republicans and they emerged as a dominant presence in the controversial
The same thing happens when considering public officials who are Republicans and are yet more open minded than most of their colleagues. Belonging to a certain political party does not necessarily mean that one has to change his or her principles. Even with the fact that the two major parties in the U.S. have different opinions in regard to a series of matters, they seem to agree in most situations.