Paternal Rights Versus Children's Welfare Term Paper

Parental Rights and Children's Welfare Sociological Analysis on Parental Rights vs. Children's Welfare: Structural-Functionalist, Conflict, and Symbolic Interactionist Perspectives

Studying the structure and dynamics of society entails not only analyzing the elements that comprise it, but also the general or 'bigger picture' of what society is -- that is, analysis of social structure and dynamics must be at the macro and micro levels. Indeed, sociological phenomena are analyzed and studied by social scientists using various theoretical perspectives formulated in order to provide researchers, as well as their audience, a look into the various interpretations that people give to explain specific events or realities experienced by the society and the individual. In the field of sociology, among these theoretical perspectives are the structural-functionalist, conflict, and symbolic interactionist traditions.

A particular example illustrating the discussion above is the analysis of parental rights and children's welfare, considered as an essential sociological phenomenon affecting the most basic institution in the society today, the family. In addition to the family, the government is also an essential element that must also be considered in the analysis, since it is also a social institution that directly affects the family with the imposition of measures and regulations concerning child welfare. Going further into these divisions,...

...

After identifying the key elements needed for the analysis, this paper discusses how the social issue of parental rights vs. children's welfare differs in accordance to the three sociological traditions/perspectives.
In the structural-functionalist perspective, "social institutions playa key role in keeping a society alive and viable." Using the concept of the division of role commonly associated with concepts of social roles and statuses, this perspective considers every member of the society as vital or functional in the society, regardless of the favorable/unfavorable status or role of the individual. Applying the issue of parental rights vs. children's welfare under this tradition, it is evident that role/status differences and culture influence the how the family, government, parents, and children interact with each other concerning this issue. Structural-functionalism posits that both parents and children have specific roles in the society that needs be accomplished; similarly, the government has the role to fiscalize and govern over the family institution, ensuring that these defined roles of the parents and children are followed. Thus, both parental rights and children's welfare are considered essential, and one cannot exist without the presence of the other.

In this case, the government and family (especially…

Cite this Document:

"Paternal Rights Versus Children's Welfare" (2004, April 15) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/paternal-rights-versus-children-welfare-167379

"Paternal Rights Versus Children's Welfare" 15 April 2004. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/paternal-rights-versus-children-welfare-167379>

"Paternal Rights Versus Children's Welfare", 15 April 2004, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/paternal-rights-versus-children-welfare-167379

Related Documents
Gay Adoption Is an Important
PAGES 30 WORDS 10332

Of this group. 50% were male, 50% were female, 38% were White, 35% were Black, and 16% were Hispanic. Adoption statistics are difficult to find because reporting is not as complete as it should be. The government spent $2.6 billion dollars to conduct the 1990 Census, but still it under-represented minorities and categorized children as "natural or by adoption" without differentiating, while special laws were implemented to "protect" and

" Hence, images of children are often used to "reproach the rest of the adult world for its misdemeanours"; and in presenting that picture, children connote "both the future and a moral voice of the 'good self'..." Burman generalizes that the "universalization of Northern childhood thus mirrors the Northern colonial domination of the South." And interfaced with that dynamic, she continues, is the "Christian symbolism associated with colour ("white-child-angel, black child-devil")...

There's an attitude that if you're doing something you usually do with women, then you are not gay" (Rhoads, 1999, p. 136). This notion of homosexuality among Puerto Rican community is reflective of the perception elsewhere in Latin America. For instance, Rhoads adds that, "Such a perspective exists throughout much of Latin America, where activos (sexual aggressors in same-sex encounters) are typically not considered to be gay, whereas pasivos

Social Work in Family assessmentThe main scope of the family assessment and engagement in a social work scenario is to yield information required to respond to the individual needs of every family member in strict accordance with the urgency plans. The social workers or the welfare professionals effectively partner and collaborate with the family network to acquire the viable information needed about the family. The concerns raised are usually addressed