Presidential Speech Speech: War On Term Paper

PAGES
4
WORDS
1378
Cite

Of course such a call to arms does not come without sacrifices. I understand the suffering caused by this threat. Some have themselves been threatened by invasive or abusive actions. Citizens have become paranoid on the basis of skin color or religion. Others have been victims of unfair discrimination at airports. Such actions cannot be tolerated within our beautiful country. We are members of the same nation, with the same rights and the same freedoms. Inter-citizen conflict of this kind is unacceptable. Instead, let us focus on the actions that will bring us closer to eradicating the real threat of terrorism from outside the country. Let us focus on building our relationships as American citizens, rather than members of different ethnic nations and groups. Let us reconcile our differences and build the strength that we know can be ours.

My fellow citizens, let us take up arms against real threats. For some this will mean taking up physical arms. For some this will mean making sacrifices. Some will sacrifice their time, while others will make concrete sacrifices in the form of services, loved ones or financial input. In terms of this last, I have to inform you as citizens of this beautiful country that some tax input will be channeled towards the war effort in Iraq. I also want to place emphasis on the important work that our young soldiers are doing in this country. They are at the very frontlines, curbing the power and the evil of the terrorist force that has invaded our country. As such, these soldiers deserve our full support.

A therefore ask support in terms of prayer, friendship to family members - wives and children who are left behind - and your tax input. I am happy to say that much of the war effort has been successful. We have made great progress in helping innocent Iraqi citizens to themselves taste the beauty of freedom and democracy. Many young soldiers have made the ultimate sacrifice to achieve this, and for this we thank them and their families....

...

I personally thank you, my fellow citizens, for your understanding and your support.
Analysis:

Generally, this speech relies heavily on emotional appeal. Reminding the citizens of the events on 9/11 has particular emotional appeal, as this day lives in the cultural consciousness as a very painful and very poignant memory. This is then used as the basis for the rest of the speech that attempts the citizens that the war on terrorism, and particularly sending troops to Iraq, is a viable action to curb terrorism.

The speech is organized in such a way that emotional appeal takes precedence over factual statements. Indeed, few statements in the speech are purely factual. In fact, the speech frequently includes emotional elements such as including the audience in terms of their relationship to the President as "fellow Americans" or "fellow citizens." This reference places them on a perceived equal basis with the leader and is aimed at making them receptive and more open to the rest of the speech.

The negative elements of the war receives less attention than the positive elements. In turn, the negative consequences of terrorism are elevated above all else in status of importance. As such, the focus of this is on the threat from abroad and what should be done to keep this threat from crossing into the United States. The fact that prejudice and suffering within the country are often the direct result of Government policy regarding the war on terrorism is not mentioned at all. Furthermore, the suffering of American citizens themselves are justified as "sacrifices" made for the cause of the American way of life.

Political discourse involves certain limitations in terms of disclosure, especially in terms of persuasion. In a speech like the one above, it is important to emphasize the points and elements that would promote the persuasion element of the main points of the speech. In this, the speech is estimated to be fairly successful.

Cite this Document:

"Presidential Speech Speech War On" (2006, December 16) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/presidential-speech-speech-war-on-40882

"Presidential Speech Speech War On" 16 December 2006. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/presidential-speech-speech-war-on-40882>

"Presidential Speech Speech War On", 16 December 2006, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/presidential-speech-speech-war-on-40882

Related Documents

PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH: KENNEDY'S INAUGURAL ADDRESS Presidential Speech: Kennedy Presidential Speech: Kennedy's Inaugural Address On January 20, 1961 newly elected president John F. Kennedy delivered his inaugural address to a nation in the midst of an ongoing "Cold War" with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). In order to put this speech in context one must understand that the previous decades may be characterized as politically tense as the associated conflicts between the

He continues, not by discussing the seriousness of the war or likelihood of the terrorists attacking again, but instead by praising the United States, advocating its positive aspects. This style of appealing to his audience is evident, once again, in his speech to the American people on the anniversary of the attacks in 2006. In this speech, Bush discusses the children who "still long for the daddies who will

Speech Bill Clinton and His
PAGES 10 WORDS 2514

" In a 2008 interview, Theodore C. Sorensen, one of John F. Kennedy's speechwriters, compared the individual appeal of Bill and Hillary Clinton and the distinct styles of two great speakers of the classical period, Cicero and Demosthenes. Sorensen recalled how it was once said that when Cicero spoke, the crowds declared, "How well he spoke," but when Demosthenes spoke, the crowds exclaimed, "Let us march!" think it applies here," Mr.

The real words of King? "I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today -- my own government." (quoted in: Husseini) The final major flaw is that Clinton addresses the black ministers with a severe racial hubris -- he never makes any mention of the racial differences that

He seems to draw easy causal connections between policy and personality that deny the exterior circumstances of history. For example, he suggests that Hoover's rigid personality made him unable to accept changes in classical economic theory during the beginning of the Great Depression, and to adopt a more Keynesian approach. Barber asserts that it was not the conventional wisdom of the time that hampered Hoover as much as his

King's introduction is blunt: "One hundred years later, the Negro is still languished in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land. And so we've come here today to dramatize a shameful condition. In a sense we've come to our nation's capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of