Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Current and Future State of Criminal Law
The 5th and 14th Amendments procedural due process provides the standard to determine whether someone has been treated fairly by the judicial system. The amendments created a model of strict compliance with regular procedures in order to protect citizens against tyranny. Procedural due process has been viewed as flexible and adaptable to changing situations (Parkin, 2019). However, in recent years, courts have become less interested in ordering alternative or extra procedural safeguards, which has represented a change in how procedural due process is viewed. Currently, procedural due process has been characterized by procedural innovations as government agencies and court systems are reforming procedures. As bottom-up procedural experimentation continues to increase, procedural due process is likely to evolve in the coming years to include procedural innovations. Procedural due process will be characterized by experimentation with new and varying procedural safeguards at federal, state, and local levels.
The Bill of Rights primarily focuses on the rights of the criminally accused or convicted. Todays American law is increasingly taking into consideration the rights of victims, and some jurisdictions have adopted a Victims Bill of Rights. Such laws have been enacted to increase the rights of the victim and provide him/her a substantive role in the criminal justice system (Gewurz & Mercurio, 2000). However, a Victims Bill of Rights could potentially conflict with the Bill of Rights and generate challenges in the criminal justice system. It could conflict with the Bill of Rights by running counter to the idea of innocent until proven guilty, curtailing the due process, and obstructing justice (American Civil Liberties Union, n.d.). For example, allowing victims to be heard prior to the determination of a case would contaminate the jury deliberation process. It could result in a biased trial and wrongful conviction if a suspected offender is innocent but the victim pleads with the jury to return a guilty verdict.
References
American Civil Liberties Union. (n.d.). ACLU fact sheet on the proposed victims rights amendment. Retrieved January 6, 2022, from https://www.aclu.org/other/aclu-fact-sheet-proposed-victims-rights-amendment
Gewurz, D.B. & Mercurio, M.A. (2000). The Victims Bill of Rights: Are victims all dressed up with no place to go? Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development, 8(1), 251-277.
Parkin, J. (2019). Dialogic due process. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 167, 1115-1159.
Due Process and the Significance of Interpretation The concept of "Due Process" is a uniquely American one, the significance of which has changed as much as has the societal and political times of the American nation. Today, some critics argue that Due Process is a thing of the past, what with the passing and signing into law of the National Defense Authorization Act, which authorizes the military to arrest and detain
In modern criminal procedure and practice, the Sixth Amendment also provides specific requirements of police, such as where criminal defendants express the desire to consult legal counsel. Irrespective of whether or not such a request precedes or follows the common recitation of Miranda warnings by arresting authorities, the Supreme Court has now long-regarded any expression of request for legal counsel as the immediate cut-off point of any further questioning (Colon, 2004;
The goal of modern constitutional criminal procedure is to define principles of law enforcement that protect citizens from government intrusions that are unreasonable in their effect on personal liberties, while simultaneously facilitating the reasonable enforcement of law and protection of society by prosecuting and punishing criminal conduct. One of the first principles in early American constitutional history was the idea that it was more beneficial to society and its citizens to
This 'law and order' approach, however, will tend to invoke discomfort amongst civil libertarians, who will object to the danger that this poses to the constitution. Accordingly, we consider the Due Process Model of criminal justice, which U.S. Legal (2010) identifies as a mode of administration which emphasizes procedural regularity, adherence to the terms of the Constitution and meaningful commitment to the notion of innocent until proven guilty. As USLegal
Due Process and the 14th Amendment Which of the protections available to criminal offenders through the Bill of Rights do not currently apply to the states? "Like the rest of the Bill of Rights, the Fourth Amendment originally only applied in federal court. However, in Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the rights guaranteed by the text of the Fourth Amendment…apply equally in state courts
Due Process Clause Fourteenth Amendment is Important to Me Adopted in 1868 to the U.S. Constitution during the Reconstruction era the Fourteenth amendment is known as one of the three Reconstruction Amendments. Of these three, the Fourteenth is the most complex and resulted in the greatest number of unforeseen effects. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment States "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or