¶ … Quiet Revolution on Real ID details a middle path between the extremes on both sides of the issue. It is informative as well balanced. In the wake of 9/11, we can not afford to sit quietly back and wait for tragedy to happen again. In that tragedy, fake ids allowed a small group of terrorists to perpetrate the largest and most devastating attack on American soil in its history. What becomes largely apparent is that the delay of Real ID can make such days (or even worse) a reality for Americans. The solution that the authors of the article not only make sense but are critical to our survival as a nation, especially in the light of the threat of terrorist nuclear weapons to America. As recently as 25 April, 2011, an Investor's Daily article spoke about Wikileaks allegations about Khalid Sheikh Muhammad's threat of a "nuclear hellstorm" if Osama Bin Laden be caught or killed ("Investors.com") . It is rare that an issue so polarizes the public. While there have been calls from many quarters to reform and overhaul the national identification system. Using the word system is almost amusing when it is applied to the ad hoc conglomeration of federal, state and local identification systems. Finally, in 2005, the Congress acted on these pleas to transform and overhaul the system with the passage of the Real ID Act. In the article, Ying defines three different ways to reform system and how the 9/11 incident created a new window for the reform of the system and the development of the movement to do so in the period between 2001 and 2005 (Ni, and Ho 1063).

The closest thing to a national ID is represented by the social security card. Unfortunately, the social security card was never designed for this purpose and has been subject to a great amount of abuse and identity theft. State driver's licenses have also been employed as a de facto national ID. Like social security cards, the driver's license system has been the victim of the same abuses, including its...

Plugging in other easily counterfeited ID "systems" does not make things any better. In addition to the counterfeiting issue, there is also the problem of accessing the records due to different databases, as well as storage and access methods. The present issue is to create a "core" ID system that will interface conveniently with the other system (ibid, p. 1064).
The first of the three options used by other countries include the establishment of a national ID card system where the federal government establishes and maintains the system exclusively. Advantages include the ability to start the system from scratch using the latest technology and complete uniformity and access (such as biometric smart cards). Unfortunately, the main downside is political, with resistance coming from advocacy groups that fear government power and its impact upon individual privacy. The second approach entails the "data clearinghouse" approach where a federal agency coordinates and stores data gathered by local and state agencies but does not engage in the gathering itself. Politically, this is more acceptable due to less financial expense and the use of present technology. Downsides include the patchwork nature of the system and the lack of interoperability of the various systems. The third or federated approach attempts to strike a balance by using one system, the state drivers license, but by redefining their format and use. While the guidelines will be federal, the states will still be responsible to administer the system and gather and store data. A readable "zone" on the card will allow data uniformity and the ability for all parts of the system to read the database. Advantages include state management and federal coordination. In addition, core technologies are similar and coordinated. Unfortunately, the downsides include the decision about which standards to use…