Introduction
Cosmetics are amongst the huge expenditures for consumers, especially women, with the revenue generated by the industry surpassing $7 billion every financial year. Cosmetic advertising provides women with product information. There is a greater likelihood of women purchasing products subsequent to seeing an ad. In particular cosmetic companies may make women to have a feeling of insecurity and thereafter offer their products as a solution. Cosmetics retailers conduct the designing and relaying of advertising with the main intention of changing consumer attitude, perceptions and purchasing behavior toward cosmetics, prompting them to purchase more products (Thompson, 2018). On a daily basis, consumers are exposed to numerous advertising messages. The fundamental objective of advertising is to strongly attract consumers by providing them information associated to the products, how such products should be applied and guidance on how to purchase them. It is totally essential to make certain that consumers perceive advertising as an aspect that is positive and constructive and nothing else. However, in recent periods, one of the key apprehensive aspects encompasses how deceptive advertising impacts cosmetic advertising and the role that cosmetic advertising regulation can play in limiting the adverse effects of misleading and deceitful advertisement practices.
Deceptive Effects of Cosmetic Advertising
Deceptive advertising is formally delineated by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) as a demonstration, omission or practice that has a likelihood of misleading the consumer and practices that have been established as being deceitful and deceptive in particular instances including both verbal and written exemplifications, deceitful product price claims, retailing of defective products or services and also the lack of disclosure of proper and pertinent information (Newaz, 2017).
Based on research conducted by Fowler, Reisenwitz, and Carlson (2015), research has shown that deceptive claims in cosmetic advertisements give rise to consumers making inaccurate decisions. In the course of time, such endeavors may cause consumers to become cautious towards and cynical of advertising claims. For example, inadequate contrasts and assessments that give the suggestion that a product is of superior quality but which fail to provide a proper appraisal referent are worthless to consumers. Furthermore, deceptive advertising claims may transform the consumers into a group of pessimists who end up being hesitant and disbelieving of the advertisers, the media and the establishments in all their forms. In addition, such claims can be deemed exasperating, belligerent and discourteous to the intelligence of the consumer (Fowler et al., 2015).
This article by Fowler et al. (2015) intends to make a determination concerning the extent to which cosmetics claims consist of deceptive content within fashion advertisements. Based on the information delineated by the authors, most of the claims appeared to be explained basically by three categorizations comprising the subjective, scientific, and performance categories. The results demonstrated that a greater number of cosmetic claims were classified more deceptive than were considered acceptable. A more wide-ranging examination of these inclinations specified that, most superiority claims were grouped as false and the scientific claims had a propensity to be clustered as ambiguous or as overlooking important information. What is more, performance claims has a likelihood of being perceived as ambiguous and endorsement claims were perceived as being acceptable.
In accordance to Knapton (2015), research study established that 1 in 5 glamorous cosmetic advertisements stand up to enquiry, with corporations criticized for their ambiguous science and fabricated or deceitful...
References
Azcuenaga, M. L. (1997). The Role of Advertising and Advertising Regulation in the Free Market. US FTC.
Dayan, N., & Kromidas, L. (Eds.). (2011). Formulating, packaging, and marketing of natural cosmetic products. John Wiley & Sons.
Fowler, J. G., Reisenwitz, T. H., & Carlson, L. (2015). Deception in cosmetics advertising: Examining cosmetics advertising claims in fashion magazine ads. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 6(3), 194-206.
Knapton, S. (2015). Four in five beauty claims cannot be substantiated. The Telegraph. Retrieved from: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11768390/Four-in-five-beauty-claims-cannot-be-substantiated.html
Newaz, N. (2017). The Impacts of Deceptive Advertising on Women Consumer. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 13(35).
Thompson, V. (2018). Influence of Advertisement on Women & the Attitude Toward Cosmetics. Chron. Retrieved from: http://smallbusiness.chron.com/influence-advertisement-women-attitude-toward-cosmetics-69974.html
With this in mind communications strategy has to be developed and implemented. The central debate remains that of degree of uniformity. The pros and cons are obvious, i.e. economies of scale, consistent message across markets, centralized control, different market characteristics, media availability and costs and government regulations (Balabanis & Diamantopoulos, 2011). The stronger argument appears to be that different strategy appears to work in different situations, rather than a
Pharmaceutical industries have to operate in an environment that is highly competitive and subject to a wide variety of internal and external constraints. In recent times, there has been an increasing trend to reduce the cost of operation while competing with other companies that manufacture products that treat similar afflictions and ailments. The complexities in drug research and development and regulations have created an industry that is subject to intense
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now