Essay Undergraduate 1,003 words Human Written

Regulatory Considerations and International Harmonization: Clinical Trials

Last reviewed: ~5 min read Medicine › Clinical Research
80% visible
Read full paper →
Paper Overview

Clinical Trials: Regulatory Considerations and International Harmonization Clinical trials are experiments that are carried out in clinical research. They are designed to provide knowledge on detection, prevention, and treatment of diseases as well as other biomedical interventions and new treatment discoveries. One important aspect of clinical trials is the...

Full Paper Example 1,003 words · 80% shown · Sign up to read all

Clinical Trials: Regulatory Considerations and International Harmonization Clinical trials are experiments that are carried out in clinical research. They are designed to provide knowledge on detection, prevention, and treatment of diseases as well as other biomedical interventions and new treatment discoveries. One important aspect of clinical trials is the generation of data on safety and efficacy, which require that sponsors get the approval of regulatory bodies and ethnic committees in every country they operate in. However, sometimes, language and culture dissimilarities present challenges that inhibit their effectiveness in foreign territories.

This text takes a look at bridging studies and harmonization technologies which are used to reduce the adverse effects that may be brought about by globalization. Discussion 1: Bridging Studies Do you think that bridging studies should be required for the development of drugs that companies plan to market in other cultures? Drug manufacturers today rely on the globalization of pharmaceutical products for their success, but sometimes, sponsors face challenges because populations in different regions differ due to ethnic factors. In such instances, bridging studies are used.

A bridging study is the additional study in a new region to bridge the gaps that may arise in clinical data due to dose response, safety, and efficacy. In light of the ethnic sensitivity a newly developed drug poses in different regions, bridging studies should be carried out for all the drugs that are to be marketed in other cultures.

Bridging studies are important because when ethnic dissimilarities are evident, but extrinsic factors like the design, medical practice and the conduct of clinical trials are similar, they provide assurance that the safety, efficacy and doses that come from the original region are applicable in the new region (National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2015). Before, sponsors often had to duplicate majority of foreign clinical data in adherence to regulatory requirements in new territories.

Bridging studies reduce this duplication by applying one main clinical data package and only conducting the necessary additional tests that are required to confirm safety and efficacy. Moreover, when properly executed, bridging studies lead to discoveries that will be useful in future research and development efforts.

Discussion 2: Harmonization of Technology Why is the effort to standardize the language used in reporting clinical trials (MedDRA) important to harmonization throughout the world? The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) is a highly specific medical terminology dictionary and thesaurus that is used to facilitate the sharing of regulatory information regarding medical products.

It was developed by the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH), and it is used in the documentation, registration, and safe monitoring of pre-marketing and post marketing activities (MedDRA, 2013). MedDRA is important because it enables drug and device companies to analyze medical history and adverse effects. It makes it easier for practitioners to interpret verbatim terms that are used by patients all over the world.

For instance on a follow up assessment by a physician, a patient may describe pain in the head as a pounding in the head, a headache, or a throbbing in the head. Since a headache may be interpreted in different ways across the globe, analyzing the verbatim terms would prove difficult. In such a case, MedDRA codes the verbatim terms so that there is consistency in describing similar terminologies. The dictionary also groups the verbatim terms in a relevant medical hierarchy.

The effort to standardize the language applied in clinical trials is important in upholding competency and to maintain uniformity in clinical trials. This is particularly because decisions on how to map the terminology within different group categories are made by international medical officers and is based on language considerations from around the globe. Integration of information among domestic and international business partners and regulators is also facilitated (MedDRA, 2013). How does it affect the conduct of clinical trials globally? MedDRA has numerous positive effects on clinical trials.

For instance it facilitates easy communications among health practitioners across the globe because it emphasizes on standardized communication of safety information. Since it is also available in various languages, it is accessible to a wide number of users and enables uniformity in reporting of clinical data. Moreover, it reduces costs associated with conducting clinical trials because it is available without charge to regulators internationally, and healthcare providers and academics can also access it from the Maintenance and Support Service Organization (MSSO) at no cost (MedDRA, 2013).

MedDRA ensures that clinical trials are regularly updated. The ICH MedDRA Management ensures the dictionary is improved continuously to meet the evolving needs of all users across the world (MedDRA, 2013). MedDRA also provides numerous tools to support criminal trials. It also facilitates consistent data retrieval during clinical trials and is reliable because it can be applied across various therapeutic areas. MedDRA also has.

201 words remaining — Conclusions

You're 80% through this paper

The remaining sections cover Conclusions. Subscribe for $1 to unlock the full paper, plus 130,000+ paper examples and the PaperDue AI writing assistant — all included.

$1 full access trial
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant included Citation generator Cancel anytime
Sources Used in This Paper
source cited in this paper
3 sources cited in this paper
Sign up to view the full reference list — includes live links and archived copies where available.
Cite This Paper
"Regulatory Considerations And International Harmonization Clinical Trials" (2015, March 31) Retrieved April 22, 2026, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/regulatory-considerations-and-international-2149170

Always verify citation format against your institution's current style guide.

80% of this paper shown 201 words remaining