Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
M6D2: Restorative Justice
The criminal justice system not only seeks justice to the victims and criminals, but restorative justice. As much as the victim benefits from the process, the criminals too ought to learn something from the entire process. According to Hancock and Sharp, 2004, several strategies have been devised in determining a convenient approach of providing justice to the direct victim, since the state does not pose as the primary victim. As a mayor, the strategies that could be of most value are ensuring community safety and enhancing competency development as accounts of restorative justice. Community safety determines the progression of a society. Through restorative justice, societal members are expected to build working relationships whose empowerment will depict the responsibility of the community. It is through such a program that past criminal offenders comprehend of their role in ensuring community protection, and hence playing an important role in maintaining state and national security. Competency development will look into other pro-social skills of the convicted. Most offenders never take the time to discover their other side, since they are always preoccupied by criminal minds. This is beneficial to the community and the offenders since more strength will be built and invested upon in ensuring that talent and skill are exponentially utilized for increasing society social and economic wealth. In addition, criminal activities will reduce with the address of factors leading...
The major setback is that some offenders term the restorative justice process as a mode of punishment, which becomes difficult uprooting the notion from them (Hess et al., 2009).
Some of the policy issues that could arise in the course of restorative justice implementation education, culture and society, and social welfare among others. The implementation process is dependent on the societal background of the offender. His or her community has a community policy that has to be adhered to while implementing restorative justice. Several cultures do excommunicate a person if he or she has been convicted. This is an issue of culture but further focused on the future security of the society at large. Some of the implications of restorative justice strategies are overlooked and it is essential to confine in one that would partake offender and society well-being. As a mayor, I would dwell on implementing competency development, since all aspects of security, society wealth and offender rehabilitation will be touched. This initiative will bring into focus the offender's, victims' and community's stake in ensuring that justice is conducted in a different but convenient manner.
References
Combs, D.T. (2011). Unwillingly Revealed: Registered Sex Offenders' Attitudes Toward the Sex Offender Registry. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 1-149.
Hess, K.M., Orthmann, C.H and Orthmann-Hess, C. (2009). Criminal Investigation. New York: Cengage Learning.
Restorative Justice: With the research conducted between the years 1997 and 1998 in the United States and Europe shows that the rate of crime was high and the culprits were never given any chance to defend themselves whenever they appeared before the court of law. This made the courts to be full and the prisons to be overcrowded as criminals saw that there was no justice in their rulings. It is
Restorative Justice Individual restorative justice paper: Case study Traditionally, the debate about the purpose of the justice system has revolved around the question of whether punishment should be retributive or rehabilitative in nature. Those who favor a retributive model stress the need for criminals to pay their debts to society and view the purpose of the justice system as primarily to punish convicts through confinement and forcing them to work. Those who
Variations of the area court model, such as teen courts, medicine courts, and household physical violence courts, focus on specific concerns in order to establish even more extensive options. The underlying presumption of neighborhood courts is that neighborhoods are deeply damaged by the sentencing procedure yet are seldom spoken with and associated with judicial results. Correcting Community justice has actually been slowest to show up in the correctional industry. Maybe this
According to Richards (2004), however, the history of restorative justice outside of the specifically named restorative justice procedures that are littered throughout U.S. criminal justice history is difficult to determine. Although she cites work that suggests restorative justice has been around since the dawn of time, she argues that some histories are used as a means to convince others of the importance of restorative justice and, therefore, often exaggerate
However the law demands that the course of action should be experimented, and evaluated on the grounds that if they are reasonable, restorative, and respectful. The offenders should comply by the standards of safety, values, ethics, responsibility, accountability and civility. The offenders should be exposed to the same nature of crime experienced by the victims, and should be provided with the chance of learning empathy. Such an offender should
Restorative justice is a forward-looking, preventive response that strives to understand crime in its social context (Maiese, 2003). It examines the root causes of violence and crime to break these cycles of crime. This approach is based on the assumption that crime has its origins in social conditions, and recognizes that offenders themselves have often suffered harm. Therefore, offenders can tell their story of why the crime occurred and, just