Paper Example Undergraduate 3,315 words

Romans 7:25 theological interpretation

Last reviewed: April 2, 2014 ~17 min read
Abstract

This essay is an exegesis on the biblical chapter 7 :7-25. The verse is laid out line by line and described in detail in a historical context. The main content of this essay explains this passage as abiding only by Christ's law and not the laws of man unless it makes sense to do so. The reasoning behind this idea is to have harmony and peace within ones own environment.

Romans 7 7-25

Main Idea and Outline

The main idea of this exegetical paper is to describe the understanding and knowledge contained within the passage Romans 7-7:25, which helps the reader find balance between, man's, nature's and God's law.

Romans 7-7:25

What shall we say, then? Is the law sinful? Certainly not! Nevertheless, I would not have known what sin was had it not been for the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, "You shall not covet." 8 but sin, seizing the opportunity afforded by the commandment, produced in me every kind of coveting. For apart from the law, sin was dead. 9 Once I was alive apart from the law; but when the commandment came, sin sprang to life and I died. 10 I found that the very commandment that was intended to bring life actually brought death. 11 for sin, seizing the opportunity afforded by the commandment, deceived me, and through the commandment put me to death. 12 So then, the law is holy, and the commandment is holy, righteous and good.

13 Did that which is good, then, become death to me? By no means! Nevertheless, in order that sin might be recognized as sin, it used what is good to bring about my death, so that through the commandment sin might become utterly sinful.

14 We know that the law is spiritual; but I am unspiritual, sold as a slave to sin. 15 I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do. 16 and if I do what I do not want to do, I agree that the law is good. 17 as it is, it is no longer I myself who do it, but it is sin living in me. 18 for I know that good itself does not dwell in me, that is, in my sinful nature. For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. 19 for I do not do the good I want to do, but the evil I do not want to do -- this I keep on doing. 20 Now if I do what I do not want to do, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it.

21 So I find this law at work: Although I want to do good, evil is right there with me. 22 for in my inner being I delight in God's law; 23 but I see another law at work in me, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within me. 24 What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body that is subject to death? 25 Thanks be to God, who delivers me through Jesus Christ our Lord!

Introduction

Incorporating the many different styles of law and regulation are extremely challenging for those who have chosen to walk with Christ on their journey. Rules give us boundaries and site posts to help manage our often debilitating sources of weakness and confusion. The purpose of this paper is to exegetically explain the New Testament Passage Romans Chapter 7 verses 7 through 25. This essay will illuminate certain principles about balance, law abiding and the importance of sin and failure in one's spiritual journey as outlined in this passage.

The essay will first give some background information about the passage and explain its authorship and its place amongst the Written Word. The essay will then analyze the passage to help bring out the more subtle details about the importance of the significant themes present in the writing. The essay will conclude with ideas on how this understanding of the passage can be applied in a practical manner and how the Holy Spirit is eventually realized by mere contemplation of the passage and incorporating its exegetical meaning into the routines of everyday life.

Context

To understand this passage it is first imperative to understand the author and the context in which this chapter in the verse is written. The Apostle Paul is credited for writing these scriptures. They were written as letter to representatives of the Roman empire to help explain both the new Christian faith that was beginning, and most likely as a means of testament to his faith, a covenant with his creator.

The New Testament, written in the Greek Language, attributed this writing to Paul's time in approximately 50 to 60 AD. This occurs after both the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus and the tone of the writing is extremely excitable if not overly-wrought with emotion and desperation to be heard. Romans is used by Christians as useful tale to help balance the needs of the individual and the needs of the collective.

Purch (2012) contextualized Romans 7-7:25 as a smaller part of the larger picture dealing with rules and regulations that is related to how the Roman empire was governing. He wrote "The purpose of Romans is less clear than Paul's other letters. He never gives a purpose statement, and because of the general lack of knowledge of the origin of the church in Rome one can only guess what its issues may have been. "[footnoteRef:2] the form of this scripture must be understood that it is simply a letter written to the Roman power structure in general and no specific claims of injustice or wrong doing are mentioned in this particular letter which composes Romans . [2: James Purch (2012). An Exegetical Study of Romans 7;7-25. Literary Baptist Theological Seminary, June 2012.]

Paul uses his unique literary skills to prove his points throughout the letter and includes many devices to help deliver a well-intentioned message. At heart of this letter is the idea of transformation and metamorphosis, as the world, especially the Jewish one, was going through massive revolution during this time with the arrival of the or a messiah known as Jesus Christ of Nazareth. To help understand this breaking away from more of the non-Christian elements of the Jewish faith, appears to be the main motivation of its creation and allows a contemplative place for those wishing to question authority of law in relation to God's law. "Romans 7 as more historical than personal: "[Paul] is not answering questions put to him in a Christian holiness convention, but rather struggling with the place of the law in God's purpose."[footnoteRef:3] [3: Ibid, p. 3.]

The verse in question, Romans 7: 7-25, is very pertinent to the main theme of the letter as significant questions arise within Paul's psyche that are acting in competing ways to help him understand the idea of salvation and the role of God in one's own journey. This particular verse is worth extra attention due to the illuminating ideas that significantly relate to the general passages of the more accepted trends of the story are revealed as holy and integral within a complete or direct experience through God or his son Jesus Christ.

Background Explanations

Much has been written about this biblical verse, most likely due to its importance in achieving a balanced live, where spirituality may be practically and wholeheartedly applied with success and fulfillment. Dunn (1974) summed up the experience of this passage in a clear and distinct way when he suggested "it is well-known, opinions regarding this passage have been divided three ways -- a division which has persisted from the earliest centuries until today1. The different views can be summarized thus: (a) Romans 7,7-25 is Paul's autobiographical account of his own pre-conversion experience; (b) Romans. 7,7-25 is not autobiographical, but depicts man in general, or the Jew in particular, apart from Christ, under the law; (c) Romans 7,7-25 describes Paul's own experience even as a believer"[footnoteRef:4] [4: James D.G. Dunn, "Romans 7, 14-25 in the Theology of Paul," Theologische Zeitschrift, September/Oktober 1975. Copyright 1975 by Friedrich Reinhardt Verlag. Basel]

The passage begins with ideas about the sometimes confusing way that Law is applied to be sanctimonious and true. Line 5 suggested that sinful passions are lawful but later in line 7 he counters that even though this is true law is not sinful. This may take some time to understand when taken out of context, but in essence Paul is clamoring for end of morality contained within law. Morals are too subjective to be generalized, however laws are necessary to guide and give encouragement to find a true path.

Stuhlmacher (1994) added some clarity to this idea in his book. He suggested almost the same thing as Paul is entitled to his opinions and his faith is adequately demonstrated by the writing itself. " Just as 7:5 provided the heading for 7:7-25, the epitome of 8: 2-17 is to be seen in 7:6. Against the background of the lament oin 7:7 -24, Paul now speaks of liberation from the Law of sin and of death and of the new service in the Power of the Spirit. "[footnoteRef:5] [5: Peter Stuhlmacher, (1994). Paul's Letter to the Romans: A Commentary. Westminster Press, 1994,p. 116.]

Man's Inability to Know Christ Materially

Paul's revelation contained in this chapter of Roman's is one of intense discovery and the lack of man's abilities to truly understand the omniscient and ever-present spirit and power that is Jesus Christ. Paul is speaking out of both sides of his mouth and realizes that this confusion and inner trapping with the ideas of law and sin are meant to be as such. In lines 10 and 11 this hypocrisy is detailed: " I found that the very commandment that was intended to bring life actually brought death. For sin, seizing the opportunity afforded by the commandment, deceived me, and through the commandment put me to death."

The miraculous physical events that manifested within Jesus' short and powerful life perhaps mad Paul and the other apostles look for more of this type. As a result every living thing or idea was to be holy and revered. This may be true, but not in the way that Jesus may have intended. The trickster God that Jesus was, felt that humor, laughter and surprise were effective teaching measures to help make lessons become real. Cause and effect were strong tenets of his teaching and it is important to understand what Christ meant when he relayed in Luke 17: 21 the idea that the Kingdome of God Is Within You.[footnoteRef:6] [6: Luke 17:21.]

Not only is the Kingdom of God inside each and every one of us, it is also with the law and the obedience and disobedience of law. It appears that Paul is starting to understand how Christ is inside everyone of us and it is up to us to obey, ignore or erase laws that do not apply to our situation. Jesus had no trouble in both breaking laws and adhering to them. His own crucifixion was a manipulation of man's law and he took full advantage of using the hate, envy and obedience to garner support for a larger and more worthwhile cause. In Matthew 10: 25, Jesus proclaimed he was not here to solve the world's problems but rather instigate revolt and change.

-for I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.[footnoteRef:7] [7: Matthew 10:35.]

This idea is also supported by Luke 12: 35:

-They will be divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law.[footnoteRef:8] [8: Luke 12:53.]

Fallibility of Man's Laws

Some of the more maddening qualities within the Jewish laws as designated within the Old Testament or Torah may have also contributed to the tone of Paul's writing to the Romans. The mean and violent God as depicted in the verses of the Old Testament do not align themselves or resonate strongly with the Son of God, Jesus Christ. There appears a big disconnect between the philosophies of "an eye for an eye," and the more gentile "forgive them, they know not what they do." There is no Golden Rule in the Torah, as slavery, rape, pederasty, genital mutilation, murder, torture and many other abominations of human interaction are proclaimed as divine law.

To confuse matters worse, the exchange on Mt. Sinai between Moses and God in Exodus does not align with these ideas as, honor truth and respect are hallmarks of the Ten Commandments. It appears there is an intent to deceive and create wonder within the minds of the readers of these scriptures as not everything is clearly understood nor congruent with logical and rational thought.

The Use of Parable

Paul's letter to the Romans as highlighted by Chapter 7 has a feeling of intellectual frustration being expressed into an almost resigned attitude about accepting Christ. A total change of thought is documented from the helpless lines in the beginning of the verse to the brief and affirming idea of the closing passage:

-Thanks be to God, who delivers me through Jesus Christ our Lord!

The teachings of Christ are self-evident but require mediation and thought. Paul's stance against the rationality of law is in accordance with Jesus' form of teaching through parable and story. Matthew 13:24 is explicit about this fact:

-All these things Jesus said to the crowds in parables; indeed, he said nothing to them without a parable.[footnoteRef:9] [9: Matthew 13:34]

Also Mark's testament includes this idea when it was written:

-All these things Jesus said to the crowds in parables; indeed, he said nothing to them without a parable.[footnoteRef:10] [10: Mark 4:34]

Codes and secrets were important to the early Christians much like they are today where solemn oaths are taken to prove such loyalty and faith.

Today's hyper-material world that bases almost all of its decisions with too much emphasis on science and positivism has lost the more nuanced benefits of the spiritual life as taught by Jesus Christ. Those who know the secrets of parable and can in fact know and internalize the message by way of myth and story, have a decided advantage in negotiation the rough seas of life which include obeying silly and often inhuman laws, that do indeed deceive as Paul warns about.

Self-Realization of Christ Consciousness as the Key to Salvation

Once these ideas about self-realization, the illusion of material and the dwelling of the Spirit of Christ awakens inside and from within, the Romans verses in question become much more clearer and more practical to employ. Essentially Paul is putting man's law in its proper prospective and is letting his audience know, that although the laws are absurd, obey them at your own peril.

It is important to highlight that Paul neither advocates nor dismisses the laws themselves as something that must be obeyed, rather the subjective interpretation of the law is much more important. In other words, the Spirit of Jesus Christ and your faith in his ability to lead you to the promised land of correct decision making should ultimately be referred to when making decisions about what laws to obey.

Laws, in and of themselves are like parables. These parables according to Paul are not sinful and full of sin at the same time until the Christ intervenes and makes things in balance. To emulate Christ means to break man's law when he sees fit and to obey it when it appears to be the right thing to do. For many this is too much to handle and the true essence of this teaching will often be overlooked. This is predicted by Christ himself as he warned his followers to be careful what is revealed to the dirty and unwashed masses. He referred to these types of people as sub-human pigs:

You’re 82% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
References
8 sources cited in this paper
  • Dunn, J. Romans 7:14-25 in the Theology of Paul. Theologische Zeitschrift, September/Oktober 1975. Copyright 1975 by Friedrich Reinhardt Verlag. Basel. Retrieved from http://www.presenttruthmag.com/archive/XXXI/31-8.htm
  • Grubbs, I. Commentary on Paul's Epistle to the Romans, ed. George A. Klngman, 5th ed. (Cincinnati: F.L. Rowe, 1946), p. 100.
  • Piper, J. Who Is This Divided Man? Part 2. Romans: The Greatest Letter Ever Written. Desiring God Foundations 2013.
  • Purch, J. An Exegetical Study of Romans 7:7-25. Literary Baptist Theological Seminary, June 2012. Retrieved from http://jamespruch.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/exegesis-of-romans-7-7-25.pdf
  • Smelser, J. An Analysis of Romans 7:7-25. Guardian of Truth XXVII: 19, pp. 586, 598-601
  • October 6, 1983. Retrieved from http://www.truthmagazine.com/archives/volume27/GOT027280.html
  • Stedman, R. The Continuing Struggle. From Guilt To Glory-Explained.19 Sep 1976. Retrieved from http://www.raystedman.org/new-testament/romans/the-continuing-struggle
  • Stuhlmacher, P. Paul’s Letter to the Romans: A Commentary. Westminster John Knox Press., Louisville, 1994.
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2014). Romans 7:25 theological interpretation. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/romans-7-725-186669

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.