Scientific Methods
The law enforcement in the U.S.A. today is better equipped to handle the terrorism attacks and any terrorism threats than it was before the 9/11 incidence in America. This is evident in the general ways through which the security measures are implemented in the country and the intricate manner of investigations that take place to counter terrorism.
Due to the nature of the data and information that is needed here, the scientific method employed was statistical data collection. This was due to the fact that there is need to have objective information on the facts surrounding the various arms of law enforcement. The best way to have facts behind the changes that took place after the 9/11 in terms of the quality of training and the number of law enforcement agencies, it was not feasible to conduct interviews among the Americans as they would only give a general view and feeling about the state of law enforcement and they may not necessarily have hard facts to support the pronouncements, yet this is a sensitive area that needs backing of data from reliable sources.
Survey was also a scientific method that was not feasible since due to the intricacies involved in the security matters and the sensitivity of some quarters say of training, it would be impossible to move anywhere closer to the information one needs than the public exhibition of the training. Observation would also be as limited just as survey since the secretive nature of the training that the counterterrorism units go through may not allow a researcher to observe...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now