Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … U.S.A. PATRIOT Act Remain in Effect in Its Present Form?
For more than 200 years, the level of civil liberties afforded American citizens has waxed and waned according to the perceived level of threats arrayed against the nation's interests, with the most recent example of curtailment being the U.S.A. PATRIOT Act which was enacted hard on the heels of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Despite the guarantees contained in the Bill of Rights, this law has seriously eroded the civil liberties of all Americans in an overly zealous attempt to ferret out terrorists wherever they may hide. This paper provides a definition of the U.S.A. PATRIOT Act's purpose and main powers, following by a review of the relevant literature concerning whether it should be abolished or preserved. An argument in favor of the Act's abolishment is followed by a summary of the research and important findings in the conclusion.
The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorist Act, or USA PATRIOT Act (hereinafter "the Act") was rushed though the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President George Bush mere weeks later on October 26, 2001. The Act's was written by the U.S. Department of Justice in order to increase the powers of federal agencies to use electronic surveillance to intercept communications (both nationally and internationally), to conduct various searches, and...
In sum, the Act facilitated the creation of new crimes, new penalties and provided more efficient procedures that could be used against international and domestic terrorists (Bonet 46). Moreover, proponents also point out that the Act did not contain any sweeping changes that adversely affected the civil liberties of average Americans, and many of its provisions had been carefully scrutinized in the past, sometimes for several years. In this regard, Kerr emphasizes that, "Many of the Patriot Act's provisions had been proposed by the Clinton Administration long before September 11, and had been debated and discussed for years both within law enforcement and civil libertarian circles" (608). Furthermore, the provisions of the Act were congruent with the fundamental legal structure created by Congress in 1986 codified in the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (Kerr 608). In fact, Kerr argues that critics of the Act simply do not understand what it does, nor do they fully grasp the need for the law in the first place. For instance, Kerr points out that, "Ironically, while the media braced for extreme measures following the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, the Internet surveillance provisions…
Works Cited
Bonet, Sally W. (2011, Fall). "Educating Muslim American Youth in a Post-9/11 Era: A Critical
Review of Policy and Practice." High School Journal 95(1): 46-51.
Kerr, Orin. S. (2003, Winter). "Internet Surveillance Law after the U.S.A. Patriot Act: The Big
Brother That Isn't." Northwestern University Law Review 97(2): 607-631.
available: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/09/07/do-we-still-need-the-patriot-act/the-patriot-act-gives-too-much-power-to-law-enforcement.
USA Patriot Act United States has been utilizing and exploiting all possible means of thwarting potential terrorist attacks and eliminating terrorist elements from the country. Various laws have been enacted to control information flow and to curtail any risk of terrorism activity against the United States. With communications means becoming more advanced, the country also needed to monitor the terrorist activities carried out through communication channels including Internet, emails and telephones.
Moreover, a prosecution of the core leadership of an organization under RICO charges is likely to produce revelations concerning the relationship between leadership and other members who are either guilty of racketeering or some lesser scope of individual crime. This is to say that RICO was essentially designed to push the door open on the activities of such typically obscured enterprises in order to systematically disrupt its initiatives and
While this is not yet true for the United States, might the country be dangerously close? If one could return to the events on 9/11, is it not possible that the diminished freedoms brought about by legislation such as the Patriot Act and its successor almost smack of tyranny? These are important questions to consider if the much-mentioned American "way of life" is to be preserved. Tyranny is far
It is highly unlikely that they would become involved with illegal activities knowingly. However, the complicated nature of compliance risk and the high expectations within the banking industry make it possible that some legal manner might be overlooked. Chief Compliance Officers are at particular risk due to the nature of their position and should be increasingly diligent to maintain a proper understanding of the expectations of compliance. Additionally, Chief Compliance
In this encouragement, American would help to touch off something perhaps all the more miraculous given the proximity to its oppression to the European peasantry at large. First in the doctrines which would be formulated in the wake of French independence and secondly in the way that Napoleon Bonaparte would begin the spread of such doctrines to a continent driven by inequality, America's revolution could be said to have been the opening round in the deconstruction
Domestic Terrorism The Al-Qaeda group is probably the most popular terrorist group known this century for their very high-profile attacks; their most bold move was the destruction of the World Trade Center, now known today as 911, or September 11th. These motives are said to be of the religious sort, however there are arguments when it comes to the validity of these claims, as it may come off as to discriminate