Slavery Clauses In The United States Constitution Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
864
Cite

1. What specific regulations/rules does the U.S. Constitution make about enslavement in America (article I: sect. 2 #1; article I, sect. 9, #1; article IV, sect. 2, #3)?  Article I, Section 2 includes the “three-fifths” clause, which helped slave states gain more Congressional representatives by allowing slaves to count as “three fifths” of a person. Article I, Section 9, Number 1 places a new tax on the importation of new slaves, essentially leading to the ban on the trans-Atlantic trade. Article IV, Section 2, Number 3 contains the Fugitive Slave clause. This clause mandates that anyone who apprehends a runaway slave return that person to the owner. Essentially, this clause makes it a crime to aid, assist, or house a fugitive slave. Source: United States Constitution

2. How specifically is the "3/5 compromise" a compromise between southern “slave states" (i.e., VA, SC, etc.) and northern “free-labor” states (NY, MA, etc.)?

The “three fifths” clause was framed as a compromise because the Southern states actually wanted slaves to count as full people. It seems ironic that the slave states would have wanted slaves to count as full people under the Constitution; the reason was both to gain more tax revenues and to gain more clout in Congress (”Three-Fifths Clause,”...

...

Taxes were distributed proportionately, as well as the allowances for members of Congress. Northern/free states objected, as counting slaves would strengthen their political opponents in the South while offering no tangible benefits to their own constituents. Therefore, a compromise was reached.
3. Also, how specifically is the prohibition against ending the "slave trade" before 1808 a compromise between southern “slave states" (i.e., VA, SC, etc.) and northern “free-labor” states (NY, MA, etc.)? 

The 1808 clause did not decisively end the slave trade; it simply presented a tariff that served as a compromise between those who wished to perpetuate the trade indefinitely as a means of bolstering the economy in general, and those who wished to end the slave trade (“The Slave Trade and the Constitution,” 2012). It was not just for humanitarian reasons the north wished to end the slave trade. The free labor states understood that the southern economy depended on the trade, which exemplified the power struggle between the North and the South. The 1808 clause was a compromise in order to facilitate the ratification of the Constitution (“The Slave Trade and the Constitution,” 2012).

4. Also, how specifically is the "fugitive" regulation a compromise…

Sources Used in Documents:

References



“Fugitive Slave Clause,” (2012). Heritage Foundation. Retrieved online: http://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/4/essays/124/fugitive-slave-clause

“Three-Fifths Clause.” Heritage Foundation. Retrieved online: http://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/1/essays/6/three-fifths-clause

“The Slave Trade and the Constitution,” (2012). Retrieved online: http://abolition.nypl.org/essays/us_constitution/3/

United States Constitution. Available online: http://constitutionus.com/

 



Cite this Document:

"Slavery Clauses In The United States Constitution" (2017, September 18) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/slavery-clauses-united-states-constitution-2165945

"Slavery Clauses In The United States Constitution" 18 September 2017. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/slavery-clauses-united-states-constitution-2165945>

"Slavery Clauses In The United States Constitution", 18 September 2017, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/slavery-clauses-united-states-constitution-2165945

Related Documents

GOVERNMENT Government: US ConstitutionState laws cannot conflict with the Constitution, which is a constraint for state laws. It is so because if the conflict occurs, federal law shifts the state law under the Supremacy clause of the Constitution (Cornell Law School, n.d.).The Fifth Amendment implies that the death penalty cannot be rendered without due process of law (The New York Times, 1994). It appears that the death penalty could be

Mill and U.S. Constitution None of the issues being raised today by the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement are new, but rather they date back to the very beginning of the United States. At the time the Constitution was written in 1787, human rights and civil liberties were far more constrained than they are in the 21st Century. Only white men with property had voting rights for example, while most states

Democracy's Guidelines and the Supreme CourtIntroductionThe United States has followed important democratic guidelines from the beginning. These are written in important documents such as the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Over the years, these guidelines have been used and interpreted in different ways through important Supreme Court decisions and key actions by Presidents. How power is shared between the three parts of government, how individual rights are protected, and

Equality in AmericaThe tension between freedom and unfreedom in the American Revolution and the subsequent framing of the Constitution reflects the complexity of American history and its ongoing struggles with inequality. While the Declaration of Independence proclaimed that all men are created equal, the Constitution was designed to protect the interests of the wealthy and powerful, including slave owners.The 3/5 Clause, which counted slaves as three-fifths of a person for

This information is important, because it shows how Northerners did not fully understand the way that they indirectly supported slavery. Where, the various raw material produced by slaves, would be used to help benefit the citizens in these areas and the country as whole (by increasing trade).Those who are claiming that slavery should be abolished, are showing their lack of understanding surrounding the various issues of economics. As a

The relevant portion of the Article specified that "Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States" by adding free Persons to three fifths of "all other Persons" (meaning slaves). The immediate effect of compromise increased the seats of the Southern states from 38% in the Continental Congress to 45% in the first U.S. Congress; it also helped to elect slave-owning presidents in 12 of the first