A pre-embryo is the fertilized cell that has not yet been planted into the human host. Once the pre-embryo is implanted into the female host, it is assumed that it will grow and develop into a human being. The pre-embryo is not the same as the embryo, it is simply the raw material.
A national bioethics committee has been assigned the duty of exploring these issues and making recommendations that will shape future public policy (Eiseman 71). This committee will help to assure that research using embryonic stem cells proceeds in an acceptable direction.
4.0 Future of the Issue
Regardless of the emotional issues and personal opinions regarding the use of embryonic stem cells in research, and eventually, in the cure of many diseases, stem cell research continues at an increasing rate. A search in PubMed reveals over 23,000 studies that mention stem cells or stem cell research. Stem cell research holds the potential for the promise of a cure for many currently incurable conditions. Much of the current body of research concentrates on finding the mechanisms the control stem cell regeneration and the ability to grow new tissues.
Currently, the first clinical trials are getting underway to help search for the cures to diseases such as acute lympohblastic leukemia (ALL) (Brentjens, 375) and other metastatic gliomas (Gonia, Goldsby, and Matthay et al. 4162). Due to the controversies over embryonic stem cells, many of these trials use adult harvested stem cells that cause no harm to the donor. However, it is not known if these cells are as good as undifferentiated embryonic stem cells. The verdict is far away and will be a long time coming. If embryonic stem cells are found to be superior to adult harvested stem cells, then researchers and ethics analysts will have to decide if it is right to deny a person the life-saving treatment that they need because a "potential" human being may lose their life.
The debate over embryonic stem cell research becomes complicated when one must tell an adult that their life is not worth as much as a few cells from an embryo that "might have been." This is the heart of the debate and a scenario that is currently being played out. It is difficult to justify denying potentially life-saving treatments to someone who has been a productive member of society and whose life has an impact on the many other lives that they touch. The emotional appeal argument works both ways....
The key point is that embryonic stem cell research already has the potential to save lives.
It is arguable whether the stem cells used for embryonic research represent "human life." They are as of yet, undifferentiated and it has not been determined that they will develop into a human being. They were not chosen for implant because they were not considered to be the most viable for the in vitro fertilization process. That is not to say that a human produced from them would be anything short of a miracle, it is doubtful whether they would have developed into a human being at all.
Emotional appeals set aside, the real question is whether it is wrong to impede the pace of research and the search for cures to currently incurable diseases. Understanding the history and basics of human stem cell research provides a better understanding from which to form an opinion. Right now, research is on the cusp of some amazing discoveries regarding the use of stem cell research, Medical breakthroughs are likely to come that will change people's lives. Support for stem cell research should continue to be supported, regardless of the minority that is currently opposed to it. There is simply too much at risk to do otherwise.
Bellomo, Michael. The Stem Cell Divide: The Facts, the Fiction, and the Fear Driving the Greatest Scientific, Political, and Religious Debate of Our Time. New York: AMACOM.
Brentjens RJ. Cellular therapies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2009
Cowan, C., Klimanskaya, I. And McMahon, J. et al. Derivation of Embryonic Stem-Cell Lines
from Human Blastocysts. New Eng. J. Med. 350.13 (2004): 1353-1356.
Eiseman, E., the National Bioethics Advisory Commission: Contributing to Public Policy. Santa Monica, CA. (2006): 71.
Fox, M. Skin cells produce library of diseased stem cells. Reuters Online. 7 Aug 2008
Web. 12 Oct 2009.
George, R. And Berg, T. Six Stem Cell Facts. The Wall Street Journal Online. 14 March 2007.
Web. 12 Oct. 2009 < http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117384191108736444.html?>
Gonias, S., Goldsby, R., and Matthay, K. et al. Phase II study of high-dose [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy for patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 1;27(25):4162-8. Epub. PubMed.
Kinsley, M. The False Controversy of Stem Cells. Time Magazine Online. 23 May 2004. Web.
12 Oct 2009
MedIndia. Stem Cells -- Fundamentals. n.d. Web. 12 Oct. 2009
National Institutes of Health. Stem Cell Basics . In Stem Cell Information. Bethesda, MD:
National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2009.
Web. 12 Oct 2009.
Novak, D. The Sanctity of Human Life. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. 2007..
UK Stem Cell Foundation. Stem Cell Research. n.d. Web. 12 Oct 2009.
This is why it came as no surprise to the rest of the country when Proposition 71 was passed, in direct opposition to the policies of the Bush administration. Even California's governor, a Republican and Bush supporter, sided with Californians on the stem cell issue. The promise of freedom to research as they see fit and the funding to do so will likely draw more scientists to California, should
Stem Cell Research Should Have More Government Funding The topic argument "Stem cell research government funding." For paper, construct argument defending a claim policy. Remember argument based a claim policy, writer seeks solve a problem establish a problem exists, part argument entail claims fact Stem cell research should have more government funding A stem cell can be defined as type of cell that can be found in many body tissues. Stem cells can
but, Cuomo continued, Bush's position "…remains a minority view" (Hurlbut, 822). Christine Todd Whitman, who served Bush as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency in Bush's first term (she served from January 2001 to May 2003), and was the first female governor of New Jersey, supported embryonic stem cell research. Whitman noted in her book that right after Bush was re-elected in 2004, Christian conservative organizer Phil Burress was heard
At this point it should be clear that there are no good reasons to oppose the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research and only good reasons for supporting. Opposition to the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research can only be justified by an appeal to unreasonable and arbitrary moral standards based not on logic, reason, or concern for human well-being, but rather on the dictates of outdated and
Stem Cell Research The Legal Argument and Analysis for Stem Cell Research Stem cell research is a new field of research that brings many ethical issues and considerations in which U.S. regulations have been mostly hostile while around the world, the response toward the research has been positive. What is the legal culture in which the U.S. finds itself regarding stem cell research? What are the ethical considerations involving our participation in
Stem cell research has generated much media attention in the last decade. Stem cells are a specific type of cell in the human body that can develop in many different types of cell types during the early life growth (NIH, 2010). Stem cells are used today for the treatment of some diseases and scientists are hoping in the future it will be able to cure much more. At this point