" He argues that it is wrong to use these embryos even though they will just be discarded and wasted anyway. For this reason, people with grave diseases and disabilities argue that Bush needs to change his stance. Supporters want to implement an aggressive federal program so that the potential of stem cell research can be realized. Currently, federal funding is limited to stem cell lines that already exist. The funding does not allow further destruction of fertilized eggs.
Stem cell research is incredibly important and should be fully examined so that we can do as much as possible to find cures and alleviate human suffering (Feinstein, 2004). It is important that the government make every effort to expand the current policy so that federal funds will be available for more embryonic stem cell lines.
Basically, the controversy over stem cells involves just one specific type of research -- research using stem cells from human embryos (Fox, 2005). Currently, these types of stem cells are taken from frozen embryos left over in fertility clinics, but they can also be made using the same cloning technology that created the infamous Dolly the sheep. The other type of research comes from adult stem cells, which come from human cells or tissues, other than the egg, sperm, zygote, and early embryonic cells. However, this type simply is not as beneficial to research.
Only the use of embryonic stem cells is controversial, as many people believe that a fertilized egg is fundamentally a human being with rights and interests that must be protected (Medical health Encyclopedia, 2005). Opponents of stem cell research do not want fetuses and fertilized eggs used for research purposes.
Still, supporters of stem cell research argue that the fertilized eggs are donated with consent and would be discarded anyway (Medical health Encyclopedia, 2005). Therefore, there is no potential for those fertilized eggs to become living human beings.
As with many moral and ethical...
Recent reports that South Korean scientists are using cloning technology to create embryonic stem cells from living human patients have prompted momentum for both sides in the controversial debate on stem cell research (Fox, 2005).
Rival bills in both the House and Senate could either ban stem cell research outright, or fuel it with more federal funding (Fox, 2005). Currently federal funding for work with stem cells taken from human embryos is very restricted but researchers have the right to use private money freely.
California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a co-sponsor of the Senate bill, hits the proverbial nail on the hammer when she recently spoke out against the importance of the United States staying ahead of other countries when it comes to stem cell research.
Stem cell research is the bright new frontier of medicine," said Feinstein (Fox, 2005).
But federal inaction has created a void that has been only partially filled by states and by private entities, and it has allowed other countries to move ahead of the United States in this important area of cutting-edge medical research."
Neergaard, Laurie. (April 26, 2000). Master Cell' Research Spurs Debate. Associated Press.
Medical Health Encyclopedia. (2005). Stem cell research. Retrieved from the Internet at http://www.healthscout.com/ency/1/007120.html.
Feinstein, Dianne. (2004). Senator Feinstein's Embryonic Stem Cell Research Petition. Retrieved from the Internet at http://feinstein.senate.gov/stemcell.html.
Fox, Maggie. (May 19, 2005). Stem cell bills head for…
Supporters want to implement an aggressive federal program so that the potential of stem cell research can be realized. Currently, federal funding is limited to stem cell lines that already exist. The funding does not allow further destruction of fertilized eggs.
The documents we provide are to be used as a sample, template, outline, guideline in helping you write your own paper, not to be used for academic credit. All users must abide by our "Student Honor Code" or you will be restricted access to our website.
(Condic, 31) Scientists visualize immeasurable value in the application of embryonic stem cell research to comprehend human growth and the development and healing of ailments. More than 100 million Americans are ailing from the diseases that subsequently might be dealt more successfully or even cured with embryonic stem cell procedure. Majority of the researchers consider stem cell research as having large prospects for healing human ailments ever since the
The prospect of extracting DNA from the patient for combination with embryonic stem cells offers these patients the chance to live normal lives because the organs developed in this manner contain only the patient's own tissues. More importantly, this particular use of stem cell technology would spare the lives of the vast majority of needy organ recipients that die every year before a suitable organ can be found for them
Analysts agree that Proposition 71 will at least pay for itself over the life of the bonds. According to Somers (2004): "The economists from Stanford University and the Analysis Group predict that the initiative would generate at least $6.4 billion. They say it would generate $2.2 billion to $4.4 billion if it could expand the state's biotechnology industry by about 5%, with new jobs, construction of new buildings and increased
Stem Cell Research Should Have More Government Funding The topic argument "Stem cell research government funding." For paper, construct argument defending a claim policy. Remember argument based a claim policy, writer seeks solve a problem establish a problem exists, part argument entail claims fact Stem cell research should have more government funding A stem cell can be defined as type of cell that can be found in many body tissues. Stem cells can
Embryonic Stem Cell Research The use of human embryonic stem cells in scientific research has held great promise for some but this research has also produced powerful objections from others. Indeed, there is a profound if sometimes vehemently expressed moral argument that emerges from embryonic stem cell research. The principal objections to the use of these stem cells has come from evangelicals, conservative Christians and others who equate using embryonic stem
but, Cuomo continued, Bush's position "…remains a minority view" (Hurlbut, 822). Christine Todd Whitman, who served Bush as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency in Bush's first term (she served from January 2001 to May 2003), and was the first female governor of New Jersey, supported embryonic stem cell research. Whitman noted in her book that right after Bush was re-elected in 2004, Christian conservative organizer Phil Burress was heard