Surveys More On Scaling Essay

PAGES
5
WORDS
1516
Cite

Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers In this study by Ohanian, a scale used in measuring celebrity endorsers' expertise, trustworthiness as well as attractiveness is developed. Psychometric scale development protocols are followed for testing the data reliability and validity as well. In addition, this study uses two exploratory and confirmatory samples to initiate a 15-item scale measuring the celebrity endorsers' characteristics. This article complies fully with Churchill's recommendations in several fronts as outlined below.

Several sources are researched on to identify words, phrases, and adjectives to use for this research's questionnaire; this results in the development of several adjectives describing personality traits. During the construction of the scale, 182 adjectives are identified of which some were eliminated to about 139 adjectives. Additionally, the 139 descriptors were further trimmed by a group of 38 college students; the researcher believed the words were unfamiliar with respondents, to 104.

For the identification of celebrities for the study, 40 college students named celebrities they could recall in three minutes. The most frequently mentioned names were John McEnroe and Linda Evans who had been involved in advertisements. Celebrities often mentioned, who had not been involved in advertisements, were Tom Selleck and Madonna. Afterwards, a group of 38 students indicated their level of familiarity with each of the celebrities mentioned. In addition, the participants were to name the most and least appropriate products the celebrities sponsored. The results from these samples were used as guides following the inclusion of frequently purchased products used by most individuals in the data collection. This made the final list stand as Linda Evans promoting new perfumes; Madonna, new line of designer jeans; John McEnroe, tennis rackets; and Tom Selleck, new line of men's cologne.

The validation and purification of the data was in two phases; exploratory and confirmatory phases. All questionnaire items were factor analyzed, using principal components analysis then varimax rotation. The initial factor solution for the sample evaluating Madonna resulted in four factors with eigenvalues greater than one. This four-factor solution accounted for 68.4% of the variance. In order to purify the list, items with loadings of 0.3 or greater on more than one of the factors were eliminated and the reduced list factor analyzed again. The result was three factors having eigenvalues greater than one, accounting for 61% of the variance. Additionally, the final items from each factor analysis were tested for reliability by submitting them to item analysis using item-to-total correlations. The items for each subscale were analyzed separately. To obtain a practical size scale, items with the lowest item-to-total correlations were deleted while maintaining an acceptable level of reliability as measured by Cronbach's alpha (Ohanian, 1990). To determine the reliability of subscales for different celebrities and genders, Cronbach's alpha was computed for both male and female respondents for Madonna and John McEnroe. The results indicated a highly reliable scale. Both male and female respondents had equally reliable response patterns, and the total sample for each subscale and celebrity had a reliability coefficient of 0.8 or higher. Using the LISREL methodology to verify the relationship between observable variables and latent constructs, two confirmatory factor-analysis...

...

The x2 statistic was non-significant for each model, indicating an adequate fit of the confirmatory model to the data. (X2SELLECK= 99.60, df = 87, p = 0.168; X2EVANS =109.71, df =87, p = 0.051). The root mean square residual was 0.048 and 0.046 for Selleck and Evans respectively.
Factor Loading

Madonna Sample (n = 249)

John McEnroe (n = 237)

1

2

3

1

2

1

Authoritative

0.617

-0.37

0.051

0.654

-0.156

0.009

Compatible with the Product

0.795

0.103

0.070

0.706

-0.147

0.022

Expert

0.765

0.107

0.045

0.701

-0.037

0.056

Informative

0.812

0.170

0.183

0.747

0.108

0.027

Experienced

0.725

0.186

0.021

0.531

0.077

0.034

Intelligent

0.697

0.262

0.119

0.699

0.133

0.054

Informed about the Product

0.799

0.212

0.055

0.631

-0.025

-0.195

Knowledgeable

0.798

0.246

0.174

0.695

0.121

0.079

Qualified

0.869

0.069

0.131

0.536

0.116

-0.141

Familiar with the

scale does scale discriminate within and between responders. It gives a fair result from the data collected and clear analysis as recommended by Churchill in his publication (Churchill, 1979). Just like any other research, this study has challenges it faces. First, being a quantitative analysis, it only establishes the reliability and validity of the scale rather than discovering their existence. In line with this, the existing scale can undergo modification. Besides, from the large amount of money spent on celebrity advertising, advertisers should use the scale as an integral part of their effectiveness testing and tracking.

The RELQUAL Scale

In this publication, a RELQUAL scale is developed to assess the degree of relationship quality between exporting firms and importers. This article too is to a greater degree compliant to the specifications issued by Churchill. The analysis conducted in this publication explains whether reliability, data convergence as well as validity are attainable from the instrument used for data collection. This study uses four multi-item scales in conducting out the research. This study sample involved 1,564 British enterprises of which, 111 replies were returned in 2002; a response rate of 7%.

Churchill (1979) notes that for high reliability and low measurement errors, a multi-item scales instead of single-item scales should be used. This research uses Confirmatory Factor Analysis with each item restricted to load on its pre-specified factor, with the four first order factors allowed to correlate freely. From this study, the chi-square for the collected data is significant (?2=125.97, df = 71, and p

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Churchill, G.A. (1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 64-74.

Lages, C., Lages, C.R., & Lages, L.F. (2005). The RELQUAL Scale: A Measure of Relationship Quality in Export Market Ventures. Lisbon, Portugal.

Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers' Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, Vol.19, No.3, 39-52.

Zheng, B., Hall, M.A., Kidd, K.E., & Levine, D. (2002). Development of a Scale to Measure Patients' Trust in Health Insurers. Health Services Research Vol 37 No.1, 187-202.


Cite this Document:

"Surveys More On Scaling" (2012, October 31) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/surveys-more-on-scaling-107748

"Surveys More On Scaling" 31 October 2012. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/surveys-more-on-scaling-107748>

"Surveys More On Scaling", 31 October 2012, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/surveys-more-on-scaling-107748

Related Documents

Scaling Study on Human Anger Research on anger has shown that people who tend to ruminate about past experiences that made them angry, focus attention on their angry moods, and think about the consequences and causes of episodes of anger they have experienced exhibit higher levels of the expression of anger and negative affectivity. Also, the perceptions of these individuals with regard to their social desirability and their satisfaction with life

Moreover, the sample group was demographically limited. The survey was intended to focus on this limited group as these individuals form a large component of the target market for private school education. However, the survey results could potentially have been stronger had the survey been expanded to cover all of the target market. An even stronger survey would have included those whose children have already been through the education system.

Whatever time duration is arrived at, the researcher should at least determine (preferably from the respondent) the time duration that the respondent will use as a reference, so it is clearer whether the proportion or percentage given is more or less than the eight-hour period provided as an example earlier. When did you first start chewing gum? While this is a simple and good enough question to ask about the respondent's

Scaling Application of Measurement and Scaling Concepts This work aims to discuss the role of scales in research and research design. Measurements that incorporate scale data are often incorporated into learners' quantitative research projects and dissertations. For that reason, it is critical to understand just what scaling is and how it can best be utilized in these types of projects. Scaling is based on specific rules and assigns objects to numbers. This

Physical Security Survey The following will be an overview of the Raytheon Company. Business information will be included as well as security issues the company might have. A physical security survey will be presented as well as an analysis of the results. Certain changes that are needed will be proposed. Background on Raytheon Raytheon Company is an innovation and technology pioneer with expertise in security defense, and civilian markets across the globe. With

Business Drivers Multidimensional scaling and factor analysis are a couple of different statistical techniques that can be used to understand the drivers of a business. MDS is a technique that renders multiple data points in a relational manner -- data points that end up closer to one another are expressed visually as such, while those that are fairly far from each other in the key variable are expressed as being far.