Taking the Law Seriously

Legal Issues and Accountability If the doctrines of Mistake of Fact and Mistake of Law exist in Fun Land as they do in the United States, I actually believe that my defense would turn out successfully. The fact of the matter is that I was a stranger in a foreign land and there was no way that I could know that consuming a Pepsi was illegal -- without actually consuming one and getting arrested for it.

If the facts were changed to prove that I thought the Pepsi were a Coke, a better defense would be that I was deceived and truly not aware of transgressing the law -- which is related to the aforementioned doctrines (Vukovic, 2014). I actually do agree with the balance that exists in the U.S. Constitution about the balance between the defendant and society that has shifted towards the defendant.

I do not think that there are too many protections given to the accused, for the simple fact that anyone can get accused of anything -- regardless of whether or not he or she did the crime. Thus, it is necessary for the accused to have the right to an expedient and fair trial, as well as to legal counsel. I would not make any changes about this tendency. UNIT 6 DISCUSSION I would argue in favor of the bill.

The arguments that I would make to do so is that stiff punishments would help deter people from committing this particular crime. The counter-arguments I would anticipate are that people shot the Bugs Bunny by accident. Therefore, the magnitude of the sentences disseminate for this offense should stop people from shooting had they any doubts. Personally, I would not want to amend the bill. The one word I would change to make the bill less draconian is to insert the word 'knowingly' before possesses.

Doing so could make the bill more egalitarian. UNIT 7 DISCUSSION It greatly appears as though Tom is the one who caused the boulder to fall, and should be criminally liable for the death of Jerry. He set up a deadly situation, and despite the fact that he later one renounced his plan, he did not fully disarm this weapon which was still fatal.

However, were I using the notion of causation to defend Tom, I would state that he did not cause Jerry's death because he did not directly cause the boulder to fall. In fact, another individual was the direct cause of the boulder's fatal fall, proving Tom's innocence. UNIT 8 DISCUSSION In terms of defending Susan, the basic justification for her defense is that she was ignorant as to the true nature of the surroundings taking place between Bob and Justin.

The excuse is that she believed she was preventing a crime and did not know the true circumstances that involved the aforementioned men. However, were one to argue against Susan, it is quite clear that she was merely attempting to effect vigilante justice and take the law in her own hands, which is what vigilantes do (Tripp et al., 2007). Thus, locking her up would benefit society because she was operating as though she were either above or commensurate with the law herself.

UNIT 9 DISCUSSION In the 1980's, John Hinckley was found insane and therefore not guilty of attempting to assassinate -- and wounding.