Texas Parole Board
The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles (herein referred to as the board) is a Texas-based state agency charged with determining "which eligible offenders to release on parole or discretionary mandatory supervision, and under what conditions" (Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, 2014). The board, moreover, makes decisions concerning parole revocation and issues clemency recommendations to the governor in an attempt to ensure that offenders are successfully reintegrated into the society, and more importantly, that the safety of the public is preserved (Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, 2011). The board is independent of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, but the two work closely, with the latter carrying out such responsibilities as supervising parolees, determining their release, and housing convicted felons (Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, 2011).
A Brief History of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
The Texas legislature, in 1929, did away with the "two-member board of patron advisors, which had existed since 1893, and established a three-person body to advise the governor on clemency matters" (Lucko, 2010). The three board members, one of whom was supervisor of paroles, and another chairman, were appointed by the governor in a process that was subject to senatorial approval (Lucko, 2010). During this period, the board's role was a purely advisory one, and the governor was not obliged to follow the board's advice.
The Texas Constitution was amended in 1935 to make the board an authoritative executive branch member, and the governor's clemency decisions subject to the recommendation of the board (Lucko, 2010). The Texas Criminal Court's presiding judge, the State's chief justice, and the governor were to each appoint one member to the three-member board (Lucko, 2010).
The timeline below lists the sequence of events that followed the 1935 constitutional amendment, all of which have contributed to the board's expansion and achievements. Today, the board is one of the most reputable in the country, headquartered in Huntsville, and with offices in San Antonio, Palestine, Gatesville, Angleton, Amarillo, and Austin (Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, 2011).
Year
Event
1947
The board is, with the governor's approval, granted legislative authority to release prisoners, with the exception of death convicts, for probation or parole
1957
A parole supervision division is created to increase the board's capacity to monitor offenders across district offices
1975
Six parole commissioner positions are created to assist the board. The six are appointed in the same manner used to appoint the three board members, but work independently from the board.
1983
A constitutional amendment sees the board's membership expanded to six, and the governor's revoke/release authority transferred to the board, whose membership constitutes of individuals appointed by the governor, with the senate's approval
1989
The board's membership is expanded to 18, and the parole commissioner positions done away with, amidst the creation of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, charged with overseeing parole supervisions, incarceration and probation
1995
The Texas legislature makes mandatory supervision discretionary for all offences committed on or after 1st September, 1996, and grants the board authority to block any releases that, in its opinion, posed a threat to the safety of the public
1997
The eighteen-member board is modified to create a six-member policy board, which, under the precedence of a chair appointed by the governor, would formulate parole policies, establish caseloads, and develop rules for decision-making
2003
Parole commissioners are added to the six-member board to assist with revocation and release decisions. The board today operates under this arrangement; six members appointed by the governor through the senate's confirmation, and twelve parole commissioners, two in each of the six offices.
(Source: Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, 2011; own-generated timeline)
The Board's Mission
The board's mission "is to perform its duties as imposed by article IV, Section11 of the Texas Constitution" (Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, 2013). These duties are;
To ensure that the governor is served with appropriate recommendations regarding clemency issues.
To determine whether or not to revoke mandatory supervision or parole.
To determine mandatory supervision and parole conditions.
To determine which eligible prisoners are due for release to either mandatory supervision or parole programs.
In deciding whether or not to grant parole to an offender, the board makes use of a case summary provided by the parole commissioners. Some of the information captured in the case summary includes, but is not limited to, descriptions of the offender's;
Current offence: the weight of the specific offence that put the offender in prison, together with the amount of time already served (Topek, 2014).
Criminal...
Parole Board Decision for Robert Thomas Elton The objective of this study is to examine the possibility of parole for Thomas Robert Elton, an individual presently incarcerated for the commission of crimes and specifically the offenses of Burglary and Murder. Description Robert Thomas Elton DOB -- 05-30-1955 Offense(s) -- Burglary, Murder I, previous property offense Recommendations of Other authorities -- Psychiatrist Recommends Parole Facts of the Case (1) Robert Thomas Elton was sentenced to Life in Prison on
Parole Some might describe America as being a nation of prisoners. There is no escaping the fact that our society produces many laws that result in many infractions of these laws which eventually result in many prisoners and court cases. The role of probation and the probation officer in this chaotic mess we call the justice system plays a pivotal role in the effectiveness of a communities approach on crime. The purpose
, January 2011). The way juveniles are handled is based on the Illinois Prisoner Review Board, which is "…a body created to decide the fates of adult prisoners in correctional facilities," Hassakis writes in the ISBA magazine article. Very few youths have their parents with them at their parole hearings, and moreover, "…even fewer have an adult present for parole revocation hearings" (Hassakis, p. 2). "After nearly six months of observations"
I: What do you feel is lacking in this process of parole and probation and how would one improve this? P.O: There have been many programs devised to make this process effective and recently Reintegrating Alternatives Personal Program (RAPP) was devised to reduce the recidivism rate even further. When a parolee is released back into the community, he faces a lot of problems including his transition from the prison back to
To ensure that parolees do visit their parole officers on time, the governor decided to give them an incentive. He stated that parolees who would report on time would receive a monthly stipend of $25. This would then lead to an increased contact rate between the parolee and the parole officer and thus would decrease the chances of recidivism as the officer would be able to keep track of
Surprisingly after a period of 28 months the Florida Department of Corrections found that the recidivism rate for these malefactors was only 13.6% as compared to 25% for those that completed their time in prison. Ronald L. Goldfarb and Linda R. Singer quoted an American Bar Association committee which commented after their observations on this case: If we, today, turned loose all of the inmates of our prisons without regard
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now