Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Fatal and Nonfatal Workplace Accidents and Injuries
No matter how responsible employers are, there are some jobs that are inherently dangerous. Combine that with the fact that human beings are fallible, and one sees that there will always be accidents and injuries in the workplace. However, workplace accidents and injuries encompass a broad range of events, from repetitive motion injuries to life-ending injuries. One of the interesting things to do is to examine the differences in fatal and non-fatal injuries, to try to determine if the risk of severity is linked to overall risk or if the risk of death is somehow almost separate from the risk of overall injury. In order to compare fatal and non-fatal injuries, this paper examines several facets of injuries. The first thing examined is the overall number of injuries per state and whether a state's rank according to fatal injuries is linked to the rate of overall injuries. The second thing examined is what type of accidents are related to fatal and non-fatal injuries. The final factor examined is to look at which occupations are most highly linked to fatal and non-fatal workplace injuries. Examining these three factors should provide a good overview of the similarities and differences between fatal and non-fatal accidents in the workplace.
One of the interesting factors to consider is the number of fatal and non-fatal incidents that occur in the state. Texas had the highest number of fatal injuries, 461, followed by California with 326, Florida with 225, Pennsylvania with 221 and New York with 182 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2010, "Number of fatal work injuries, by state, 2010"). It is difficult, if not impossible to compare those statistics to the numbers available for workplace injuries and illnesses,...
In addition, sample sizes available may not be sufficient to make accurate estimates. Another factor is that some states do not track particular industries. Therefore, the author found it impossible to compare state injury and illness rates with state fatality rates with any degree of accuracy.
Another interesting factor is to examine what type of accidents are considered the most lethal or dangerous. For fatalities, there was a leading cause of death and that cause of death was not even necessarily related to the underlying job description. In 2010, 40% of workplace fatalities were transportation incidents (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2010, "Manner in which fatal work injuries occurred, 2010"). Homicides accounted for 11% of deaths, while violent acts and assaults accounted for 18% of deaths (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2010, "Manner in which fatal work injuries occurred, 2010"). 16% of deaths came from contact with an object, with 9% being related to being struck by a falling object (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2010, "Manner in which fatal work injuries occurred, 2010"). Falls composed 14% of the deaths (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2010, "Manner in which fatal work injuries occurred, 2010"). Exposure to harmful substances or environments was linked to 9% of deaths (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2010, "Manner in which fatal work injuries occurred, 2010"). Finally, 4% of deaths were linked to fires and explosions (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2010, "Manner in which fatal work injuries occurred, 2010"). In contrast, non-fatal work injuries did not necessarily have such dramatic causes. The leading cause of injury requiring days…
References
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). "Manner in which fatal work injuries occurred, 2010."
All charts, Census of fatal occupational injuries, 2010.
Retrieved from: http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfch0009.pdf
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011). Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses requiring days away from work, 2010. Retrieved from: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/osh2_11092011.pdf
Retrieved from: http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfch0009.pdf
Retrieved from: http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfch0009.pdf
Retrieved from: http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfch0009.pdf
Retrieved from: http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/case/ostb2855.pdf
Workplace Injury Reducing workplace injury requires a multifaceted approach, and requires responsibility on the part of employees and managers. I am frequently called upon to move, lift, or manipulate objects. Most of the time this behavior is in accordance with my job description, and I was offered some basic safety training and guidelines when I was hired to perform the job. However, the details of each procedure were not offered in
Another human factor related to this is the fact that engineering tends to be a very specialized field. In general, home and business owners do not have the expertise to discern between quality and lack thereof in engineering. Indeed, while the quality of cheap engineering may be lower, this is not necessarily to say that expensive work entails higher quality. Some inscrutable engineers may for example use cheap materials for
Unlike our predecessors in the mines and mills and factories - and even offices - we today expect our workplaces to be safe. We consider this a birthright - that our employers should design and monitor the workplace in such a way that we are allowed to do our job without any undue risk for ourselves. And yet, of course, this is not a birthright but rather a legal protection
Furthermore, in respect of the various cultures and languages within the workforce, the manual could also be printed in each representative language, as far as this is deemed necessary. This will ensure full understanding of the rules and regulations, and also promote the function of the entire workforce as a group (Nonprofit Risk Management Center, 2005 (b)). Writing such a manual would then address the various important aspects of the
Workplace Violence Violence in the workplace is an everyday event that affects employees throughout the nation. It must be addressed, clearly defined, and possible solutions presented that will eventually identify the potential aggressor and victim. According to the United States Department of Justice (1998) the workplace is the most dangerous place to be in America. In fact, workplace homicide is the fastest growing category of murder in the United States (U.S.
G., interrupted when speaking) Someone interfered with your work activities (Kowalski, Harmon, Yorks & Kowalski, 2003, p. 39) One can see from this list that there is a significant development of aggression, in relatively mild forms that probably occurs across the board, to some degree in every business environment. Workplace aggression, between low level employees as well as between supervisors and employees is clearly a significant cause of workplace stress as well