9/11 Commission Recommendations: Implementation and Impact
This paper examines the recommendations issued by the 9/11 Commission and evaluates their implementation within the United States federal security framework. It traces the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and the specific measures adopted in response to the September 11 attacks, including improved information sharing, risk-based transportation security, enhanced passenger screening, and protection of physical and cyber infrastructure. The paper also identifies recommendations that remain partially or fully unimplemented, such as biometric exit systems, PASS ID legislation, and regional homeland security preparedness programs. It concludes by assessing which recommendations have been most effective and where adjustments—particularly around biometric border security—are still needed.
- Introduction: The 9/11 Commission and U.S. Security Reform: Background on DHS creation and Commission mandate
- Key Recommendations That Have Been Implemented: Five major post-9/11 security measures adopted
- Recommendations That Remain Unimplemented: Gaps in PASS ID, biometrics, and regional preparedness
- Most Effective Recommendations and Their Impact: DHS, ODNI, and cyber protection successes assessed
- Recommendations That Have Fallen Short: Civil liberties protections conflicting with security goals
- Conclusion and Suggested Adjustments: Call for mandatory biometric border screening reforms
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Organizes a complex policy topic by systematically moving through implemented recommendations, unimplemented ones, effective measures, and shortcomings — giving the argument a clear evaluative structure.
- Grounds each claim in specific post-9/11 programs and agencies (e.g., fusion centers, the National Cybersecurity Protection System, the Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting initiative), which demonstrates concrete policy knowledge rather than vague assertions.
- Balances praise with critique, acknowledging both the genuine progress made since 2001 and the persistent gaps, which lends the analysis credibility and avoids one-sided advocacy.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates policy evaluation through a recommendation-by-recommendation audit framework. Rather than narrating history chronologically, it uses the Commission's own recommendations as an organizing scaffold, then assesses implementation status against each one. This approach — comparing stated goals to actual outcomes — is a foundational method in public policy analysis and produces a structured, falsifiable argument.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with background on the 9/11 Commission's purpose and the creation of DHS. It then lists and explains five implemented recommendations (information sharing, transportation security, passenger pre-screening, explosive detection, and cyber infrastructure protection). Next, it addresses unimplemented recommendations including PASS ID, biometric exit systems, and regional preparedness funding. The paper then evaluates which measures have been most and least effective before concluding with a specific adjustment proposal focused on mandatory biometric border screening.
Introduction: The 9/11 Commission and U.S. Security Reform
Among U.S. citizens, September 11 is one of the most enduring dates in the national memory, defined by catastrophic terrorist attacks that fundamentally altered the country's approach to security. In their aftermath, the federal government faced an urgent need to develop a comprehensive security framework — one that would protect American residents from external attacks and equip local, state, and federal agencies to prepare for and respond to internal threats. A commission was established to conduct a security inquiry and analysis to guide the country's next steps.
A central outcome of this process was the creation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which consolidated 22 different offices and agencies into a single cabinet department. The Commission was founded on the core principle of protecting the American people from terrorism. Working alongside partners and communities across the country, DHS has since helped strengthen the enterprise of homeland security and mitigate potential threats (Kean & Hamilton, 2004).
The United States has progressively made substantial efforts to secure the nation since the September 11 attacks. However, the country's terror threats have evolved considerably over the last two decades. As new challenges have emerged, DHS has continued to focus on minimizing terror risks while maximizing the country's ability to recover from and respond to attacks and security disasters of all kinds. Several key recommendations from the 9/11 Commission have since been adopted and have effectively contributed to safety and security within U.S. borders.
References
Fong, I. K. (2010). Current state of homeland security. Rutgers Law Review, 63, 1135.
Hastedt, G. (2006). 9/11 intelligence reform: An opportunity lost. American Diplomacy.
Kahan, J. H. (2013). What's in a name? The meaning of homeland security. Journal of Homeland Security Education, 2, 1.
Kean, T., & Hamilton, L. (2004). The 9/11 Commission report: Final report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States (Vol. 3). Government Printing Office.
Shea, D. A., & Morgan, D. (2007, April). Detection of explosives on airline passengers: Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission and related issues. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.