Abortion in America: Laws, Politics, and Ongoing Debate
This paper examines the ongoing abortion debate in the United States, tracing the issue from the 1973 Supreme Court ruling in Roe v. Wade to recent legislative developments in New York and Virginia regarding late-term and full-term abortion. It discusses the ideological divide between pro-life and pro-choice advocates, the role of federal funding for Planned Parenthood, and the religious and cultural dimensions that continue to fuel political conflict. The paper also considers President Trump's public statements on the issue and how rhetoric from political leaders reflects and deepens the broader cultural divide among Americans.
- Introduction: Abortion Back in the Headlines: Recent legislation renews national abortion controversy
- Historical Background: Roe v. Wade and Legal Abortion: Roe v. Wade legalizes abortion, opposition follows
- Planned Parenthood, Federal Funding, and the Pro-Choice Argument: Funding debates and competing views on Planned Parenthood
- Full-Term Abortion Laws and the Infanticide Debate: New laws push abortion debate toward full-term pregnancies
- Religion, Rhetoric, and the Political Divide: Trump's religious framing deepens cultural abortion divide
- Conclusion: Abortion remains a defining American political conflict
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its argument in current events (New York and Virginia legislation) before moving into historical context, giving the reader an immediate sense of the topic's relevance.
- It presents both sides of the debate—pro-life and pro-choice—without collapsing into one-sided polemic, drawing on a range of named sources and direct quotations.
- The use of specific statistics (e.g., 330,000 abortions performed by Planned Parenthood in 2009; Title X funding growing from $6 million to $286 million) adds concreteness to ideological claims.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective integration of attributed quotations to support analytical points. Rather than simply asserting claims, the writer ties each position to a named source and places direct quotes in context—for example, linking President Trump's State of the Union language to the broader religious dimension of the abortion debate.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a current-events hook establishing why abortion is newsworthy, then provides historical legal background through Roe v. Wade. It moves into the funding controversy surrounding Planned Parenthood, then addresses the new frontier of full-term abortion legislation. A dedicated section connects presidential rhetoric to the religious and cultural fault lines of the debate before a brief concluding summary ties the threads together. The Works Cited list follows MLA format.
Introduction: Abortion Back in the Headlines
The issue of abortion, while never far from the spotlight, has been making headlines again as New York passed a full-term abortion law (Tolentino) and Virginia considered a similar bill (North). The Virginia proposal was described by critics as tantamount to infanticide (BBC), and President Trump called for a ban on late-term abortions in response (Green). Despite the renewed attention, Americans remain deeply divided on the issue. This paper describes the current state of abortion in America, the ongoing debate over what restrictions should or should not be permissible, and how the subject continues to be a major political flashpoint.
Historical Background: Roe v. Wade and Legal Abortion
Abortion has been legal in America since Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court case that established abortion as a legal right of the mother — that is, she had the right to determine whether to continue or terminate a pregnancy up to a certain point in the child's development. Since 1973, when Roe v. Wade was decided, abortion has been federally protected throughout the United States. Prior to that ruling, obtaining an abortion was illegal.
Advocates for human life have opposed the Supreme Court decision ever since, arguing that abortion is immoral and devalues life, womanhood, and the cultural fabric of society. Notably, Norma McCorvey — "Jane Roe" of the famous case — later reversed her position and became a pro-life advocate and abortion opponent until her death in 2017 (Selk).
Planned Parenthood, Federal Funding, and the Pro-Choice Argument
Those who support legal abortion tend to do so for ideological reasons, viewing the matter as central to the women's rights movement — as a political issue rather than a strictly moral or ethical one. They also argue that access to legal abortion is safer for women than no access at all. For that reason, pro-choice advocates tend to support federal funding for organizations such as Planned Parenthood. However, that funding is a persistent point of contention for pro-life advocates and is routinely threatened by conservative politicians seeking to represent their base (Kliff).
Many people link the abortion debate to the broader question of a woman's right to access birth control, so defunding Planned Parenthood is frequently framed as an attack on a woman's right to manage her own reproductive health. Opponents of Planned Parenthood, on the other hand, view it as an organization that undermines the concept of family and exploits women from low socioeconomic backgrounds to shield itself from ideological criticism. As Kliff notes, "it is true that Planned Parenthood is the country's largest abortion provider. In 2009, the organization performed just over 330,000 abortions, about 40 percent of all abortions that year." For that reason, many pro-life advocates direct protests specifically at Planned Parenthood.
Planned Parenthood's Title X program is the component that receives federal funding. That funding traces back to President Nixon's 1971 declaration that no woman "should be denied access to family planning assistance because of her economic condition." From a $6 million budget in 1971 to $286 million in 2017, Title X funding has grown exponentially — a trend that pro-life advocates interpret as evidence that an anti-life culture is gaining ground in America (Kliff).
Conclusion
Abortion remains a defining and deeply contested issue in American public life, one that politicians and legislators continue to engage with at every level of government. The recent changes to New York law and the proposed legislation in Virginia have pushed full-term abortion to the forefront of a debate with a long and contentious history. Since Roe v. Wade established the legal right to abortion across the United States, the lines between opposing camps have been firmly drawn. To this day, the battle continues — shaped by religion, politics, ideology, and competing visions of life, rights, and personhood.
Works Cited
BBC. "Virginia late-term abortion bill labelled 'infanticide'." BBC, 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47066307
Green, Emma. "Trump Sees an Opening With Voters on Late-Term Abortion." The Atlantic, 2019. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/02/trump-decries-late-term-abortions-state-union-address/582127/
Kliff, Sarah. "The new Trump plan to defund Planned Parenthood, explained." Vox, 2018. https://www.vox.com/2018/5/18/17367964/trump-abortion-planned-parenthood-defund
North, Anna. "The controversy around Virginia's new abortion bill, explained." Vox, 2019. https://www.vox.com/2019/2/1/18205428/virginia-abortion-bill-kathy-tran-ralph-northam
Selk, Avi. "'Jane Roe' made abortion legal. Then a minister made her rethink." Washington Post, 2017. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2017/02/18/jane-roe-made-abortion-legal-then-a-minister-made-her-repent/
Tolentino, Jia. "How Abortion Law in New York Will Change, and How It Won't." The New Yorker, 2019. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/how-abortion-law-in-new-york-will-change-and-how-it-wont
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.