This paper examines Accelerated Reading (A.R.), a widely used literacy program in approximately 45,000 U.S. schools. A.R. allows teachers to track student reading habits and comprehension through computer-based quizzes, with points awarded based on book difficulty and length. The paper describes the program's mechanics, including point systems, level assignments, and reward structures designed to motivate reading. It also acknowledges criticisms from educators who worry about the program's potential to reduce intrinsic reading motivation. Overall, the paper argues that A.R. is an effective educational tool that supports student literacy development and progress tracking.
Schools use many different programs to help their students learn and apply new knowledge. One program that has gained widespread adoption is Accelerated Reading (A.R.), a computer-based literacy management system. Approximately 45,000 schools in the United States use A.R., and the program's book list contains more than 25,000 titles, making it one of the most prevalent reading-monitoring tools in American education.
A.R. was established as a way for teachers to monitor their students' reading habits and progress. The system allows teachers to access a computer dashboard where they can see which books each student has read, the volume of their reading, and the frequency of their engagement. This real-time visibility enables teachers to identify students who may be struggling or falling behind, and it facilitates targeted interventions.
The A.R. system operates through a straightforward process. Each student selects a book from the library or school collection and reads it independently. After completing the book, the student sits at a computer and answers between five and twenty questions that assess their comprehension. The student receives a score based on their answers. To earn points toward their reading goal, students must achieve a minimum score of 60 percent; any score below this threshold results in no points awarded.
Teachers can also administer A.R. as a whole-class activity by reading a book aloud with all students and then having them take a comprehension test collectively. This approach allows teachers to assess student understanding in a structured, unified way. Many educators appreciate A.R. because it provides systematic feedback on how well students are grasping the content they read. Additionally, students can work at their own pace, making the program flexible for different learning speeds and schedules.
Each book in the A.R. database is assigned a point value based on its difficulty level and length. The point values range from a minimum of 0.5 points to a maximum of 118 points. Points are calculated using the formula: A.R. points = (10 + reading level) Ă— (words in book / 100,000). Books that are more challenging or contain more words receive higher point values, incentivizing students to tackle increasingly difficult texts.
As students complete books and pass their comprehension quizzes, points accumulate toward personal or class goals. To further motivate reading, many teachers establish reward systems. Common examples include pizza parties when all students reach 100 points collectively, or school-wide field trips as incentives for sustained reading achievement. These rewards are designed to create positive reinforcement and encourage consistent engagement with reading. For students who struggle with reading, these tangible goals can provide motivation and direction, giving them something concrete to work toward and a sense of accomplishment as they progress.
"Teacher concerns about intrinsic motivation"
"Author's argument for the program's educational benefits"
You’re 66% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.