Achievement Gap and Diverse Learning Styles for Black Students
This paper examines the persistent reading achievement gap between African American and white students in the United States, drawing on national assessment data that show only 18% of Black fourth-graders and 15% of Black eighth-graders scored proficient or above in reading. The paper critiques standardized testing as a culturally biased instrument that fails to capture diverse learning styles and non-academic skills. It argues that cooperative learning structures, particularly Kagan Structures, better serve African American students by promoting active participation, peer collaboration, and cultural inclusion. Alternative assessment approaches that account for multiple intelligences and varied learning preferences are also recommended as necessary complements to instructional reform.
- Introduction: Diversity and Learning in Education: Diversity and individualized learning in education
- The Reading Achievement Gap for African American Students: Data on Black students' reading proficiency gap
- Standardized Testing and Its Limitations for Diverse Learners: Cultural bias in standardized assessment design
- Cooperative Learning and Kagan Structures as Remediation: Peer learning and Kagan Structures as solutions
- Summary of Trends, Issues, and Evidence-Based Practices: Tabular overview of gap trends and remediation
- Conclusion: Need for learning style reform and inclusive tests
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds its argument in concrete national assessment data, citing specific proficiency percentages for fourth- and eighth-grade African American and white students to make the achievement gap tangible and urgent.
- Moves logically from problem identification (the gap and its causes) to critique (standardized testing bias) to solution (cooperative learning and reformed assessments), giving the paper a clear problem-solution structure.
- Connects instructional strategy to assessment reform, arguing that teacher-level inclusion must be matched by test-level inclusion — an often-overlooked link in education policy discussions.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates evidence-based advocacy: it uses peer-reviewed sources and national data not merely to describe a problem but to justify a specific pedagogical intervention. By citing Baker (2017), Ehsan et al. (2019), and Edwards & Taub (2016), the author shows how empirical research supports the adoption of cooperative learning structures over traditional instructional models for African American students.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a broad framing of diversity in education, then narrows to the specific achievement gap affecting African American students, supported by reading proficiency data. It critiques standardized testing as culturally biased, then proposes cooperative learning and Kagan Structures as evidence-based remediation. A structured summary table consolidates trends, issues, preferred learning styles, and remediation practices, followed by a brief concluding synthesis. This layered structure moves from macro context to micro classroom intervention.
Introduction: Diversity and Learning in Education
Within the education system, diversity is an integral part (Bryant, Triplett, Watson, & Lewis, 2017). Each student is a unique individual with a preferred learning style, which means there is no one-size-fits-all approach when it comes to learning or instruction. It is time for educators to recognize that students have different learning styles and to accommodate those varied styles in the classroom. The assessment of those students should also be reconsidered as educators account for their learning styles. The accuracy of standardized tests has been called into question, as these tests often fail to reflect the knowledge and learning of diverse students in the classroom. Consideration should be given to alternative assessments that will meet the unique needs of all students.
References
Baker, T. J. (2017). The effects of an Afrocentric curriculum on reading scores of African American third, fourth, and fifth grade students. Nova Southeastern University.
Bryant, A. C., Triplett, N. P., Watson, M. J., & Lewis, C. W. (2017). The browning of American public schools: Evidence of increasing racial diversity and the implications for policy, practice, and student outcomes. The Urban Review, 49(2), 263–278.
Edwards, O. W., & Taub, G. E. (2016). The influence of specific phonemic awareness processes on the reading comprehension of African American students. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 30(1), 74–84.
Ehsan, N., Vida, S., & Mehdi, N. (2019). The impact of cooperative learning on developing speaking ability and motivation toward learning English. Journal of Language and Education, 5(3(19)).
Meyer, B., & Paxson, C. (2019). The double-edged sword of standardized testing.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.