Against Mandatory Attendance Policies in College Classes
This essay argues that college professors should not impose mandatory attendance policies on their students. Drawing on three main points — students' legal adult status and personal responsibility, their capacity for self-directed learning, and their financial investment in their own education — the paper contends that attendance decisions should rest with the student. The essay also addresses a common counterargument, acknowledging that some students lack self-discipline, but maintains that developing such discipline is itself part of the college experience. Overall, the paper makes a case for treating college students as the autonomous adults they legally are.
- Introduction: Thesis: professors should not impose mandatory attendance
- Adult Status and Personal Responsibility: Legal adulthood grants students right to self-govern
- Self-Directed Learning and Individual Learning Styles: Adults understand their own learning processes better
- Financial Investment and Student Autonomy: Paying students deserve greater authority over their experience
- Counterargument: The Case for Mandatory Attendance: Discipline argument addressed and refuted
- Conclusion: Students deserve autonomy; mandatory policies are inappropriate
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Presents a clear, direct thesis in the opening paragraph and returns to it consistently throughout the essay, keeping the argument focused and easy to follow.
- Structures the body around three distinct supporting arguments — legal adulthood, learning autonomy, and financial investment — giving the essay logical progression rather than repetitive assertion.
- Includes a genuine counterargument paragraph that acknowledges the opposing view before refuting it, demonstrating awareness of complexity rather than one-sided advocacy.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The essay demonstrates the classic concession-and-rebuttal technique: it grants that some students lack self-discipline, then turns that concession into a supporting point by arguing that developing discipline is inherently part of the college experience. This move strengthens rather than weakens the thesis.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a five-paragraph argumentative structure expanded to six sections. It opens with an introduction that states the thesis, moves through three body paragraphs each built on a distinct claim, devotes a paragraph to addressing the counterargument, and closes with a brief conclusion that restates the thesis in light of all the evidence presented.
Introduction
The defining characteristic of college is that the vast majority of students are adults. Professors do not need to act as babysitters, forcing students to comply with rules that have little to do with actual learning in order for them to pass. Academic freedom extends to students as well as faculty, and mandatory attendance policies sit uneasily within that tradition. College professors should not be permitted to impose restrictive attendance policies, because college students are responsible adults who learn at their own pace and can use their own judgment regarding attendance and study decisions.
Adult Status and Personal Responsibility
Students attending college are, for the most part, adults over the age of 18. There are very few legally defined minors on any given college campus. From a legal perspective, anyone over the age of 18 is considered responsible enough to govern their own behavior. They no longer require a guardian to make crucial decisions on their behalf.
The same principle should apply to how professors treat their adult students. College students are not high school students. They do not need to be supervised or guided through every aspect of their educational experience as though they were children. College students are adults who have made a conscious, deliberate decision to attend classes at a higher education institution, and that decision deserves to be respected.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.