Agamemnon's Egotism as a Failure of Leadership in the Iliad
This essay examines Agamemnon's egotism as the central flaw that prevents him from being an effective military leader in Homer's Iliad. Beginning with his offense against Apollo's priest and his unjust seizure of Achilles' companion Briseis, the paper traces how Agamemnon repeatedly prioritizes personal satisfaction over group welfare. His belated and impersonal attempt at reconciliation in Book 9, his failure to understand Achilles' true motivations, and his inability to control events in the later books all illustrate his narcissistic shortcomings. By contrast, the Trojan king Priam demonstrates what genuine, selfless leadership looks like — ultimately persuading Achilles where Agamemnon could not.
- Introduction: The Problem of Egotistical Leadership: Agamemnon's selfishness alienates gods, Achilles, and allies
- Agamemnon's Self-Interest and Its Consequences: Narcissistic choices harm Greek morale and military strategy
- A Failed Attempt at Reconciliation: Book 9 reconciliation attempt is belated and transparently self-serving
- Achilles and Priam: True Leadership by Contrast: Priam's humility and empathy succeed where Agamemnon's ego fails
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay builds a clear, sustained argument — that Agamemnon's egotism is the root of every strategic failure — and returns to that claim in each paragraph rather than drifting into plot summary.
- It uses specific textual evidence from named books of the Iliad (Books 1, 6, 9, 19, 22, and 24) to anchor each claim, demonstrating familiarity with the primary source.
- The contrast between Agamemnon and Priam in the final paragraph is especially effective, using an enemy character to illuminate the protagonist's flaws through direct comparison.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper employs comparative character analysis: rather than evaluating Agamemnon in isolation, it measures him against foils — first Achilles, whose instinctive loyalty contrasts with Agamemnon's calculated self-interest, and then Priam, whose humble appeal to Achilles succeeds where Agamemnon's gift-laden emissary failed. This technique allows the writer to define good leadership implicitly through bad leadership's opposite.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens by stating the central thesis and its immediate evidence (the Apollo incident, the seizure of Briseis). A second paragraph extends the indictment with additional examples from the narrative. The third paragraph concedes and rebuts — acknowledging Agamemnon's Book 9 reconciliation attempt before dismissing it as self-serving. The final paragraph pivots to positive counter-examples (Achilles in grief, Priam's appeal), closing on a thematic judgment rather than a simple summary.
Introduction: The Problem of Egotistical Leadership
The problem with Agamemnon is that he is too egotistical to be an effective leader of men. An ideal — or even an adequate — leader would know that it is unwise to offend the gods during a crucial phase of a military campaign. Agamemnon does exactly this when he takes the daughter of a priest of Apollo as his mistress against her will, causing the wrath of the god to fall upon the Greeks in the Trojan War. When Agamemnon is forced to surrender the girl, he offends yet another crucial actor in the Greek campaign. Achilles is undisputedly the greatest warrior among all the Greeks, yet Agamemnon demands that Achilles surrender Briseis, whom Achilles adores.
A good leader would set his own needs aside in deference to the needs of the group. Instead, Agamemnon openly inflames the wrath of the young, hot-headed Achilles — even though Agamemnon is a mature man who should know better and recognize his crucial role as a leader. He should be level-headed and demonstrate impartiality. His action is also simply unfair: it is not Achilles' fault that Agamemnon's original concubine was taken from him because of her lineage.
Agamemnon's Self-Interest and Its Consequences
Homer's Iliad begins in "Book 1: Quarrel, Oath, and Promise" by depicting Agamemnon as a poor, narcissistic leader who has only his own interests at heart. Rather than earning the loyalty of his warriors, he simply demands obedience as his due, just as he demands all the best spoils of war. Agamemnon acts with emotion rather than reason. He does whatever pleases or satisfies his desire in the moment — as in Book 6, when he urges Menelaus to kill a captured Trojan rather than ransom him. This cruelty serves no military objective; it merely inflames the Trojans against the Greeks and encourages them to adopt a take-no-prisoners attitude, following the Greeks' own poor example.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.