America's Obesity Crisis: Causes, Policy, and Enforcement
This paper examines the obesity epidemic as a major public health crisis affecting not only the United States but nations worldwide. It traces the rise in obesity rates from the late 1970s onward, reviewing contributing factors such as diet, physical inactivity, genetics, agricultural subsidies, and food industry marketing. The paper surveys the competing interest groups—from diet advocates to agricultural lobbies—that complicate policy formation, and compares fragmented U.S. legislative responses with more coordinated approaches in Europe and Japan. It concludes that enforcement of anti-obesity measures in the U.S. remains weak relative to the scale of the problem.
- Introduction: A Growing Public Health Crisis: Global rise in obesity despite growing health awareness
- Causes and Contributing Factors: Diet, inactivity, genetics, and environment as causes
- Interest Groups and Political Pressures: Agricultural subsidies and food industry influence on policy
- Legislation and Local-Level Responses: Fragmented U.S. local and school-level policy attempts
- Administration: International Comparisons: Europe and Japan versus U.S. government obesity strategies
- Enforcement and Federal Inaction: Weak federal enforcement and industry self-regulation failures
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It draws on a diverse range of authoritative sources — WHO data, journalism, and academic course material — to support a multifaceted argument rather than relying on a single type of evidence.
- The paper situates the U.S. crisis within a global context, using comparisons with Japan, China, and European nations to sharpen its critique of American policy failures.
- It organizes a complex, multi-cause problem into clearly distinct analytical categories (causes, interest groups, legislation, administration, enforcement), making it easy to follow despite the topic's complexity.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses comparative policy analysis — contrasting U.S. government inaction with more coordinated European and Japanese responses — to build an evaluative argument. Rather than simply describing the problem, it uses international examples as a benchmark to measure the adequacy of American public health governance.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by establishing the paradox of rising obesity despite increased health awareness, then moves through the epidemiological scope of the crisis before addressing its causes. Subsequent sections analyze competing interest groups, local legislative attempts, contrasting international administrative approaches, and finally the weak enforcement record at the federal level. The conclusion synthesizes these threads into a pointed critique of U.S. inaction.
Introduction: A Growing Public Health Crisis
If knowledge were power, America would be thin. Despite the fact that information about food and nutrition has been more widely disseminated to Americans — through more comprehensive food labeling and research into the causes of nutrition-related diseases — the American waistline has been expanding at an exponential rate. As one source notes, "low fat foods are abundant, health club memberships are up considerably, and athletic gear manufacturing is a multibillion-dollar industry. However, overweight and obesity rates have continued to increase during this expansion of health-related industries. What are the causes for this apparent paradox of an increasingly overweight populace in the face of increasing attention to health issues?" (Etiology of obesity, Lifestyle Management of Adult Obesity, 2007).
The first signs of trouble appeared in the late 1970s, as rates of overweight that had been relatively stable for years began to rise. Families were eating more takeout and processed food. Spurred by the profit margins of volume production, fast-food restaurants pushed larger portions. Gadgets such as remote TV controls and video games meant children spent longer periods in front of televisions and computers. Through the 1990s, the waistline expansion accelerated; on campuses, once-rare vending machines multiplied (Levine & Aratani 2008).
The increase in obesity is not confined to America or even to the developed world. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), even in many nations where people lack access to vital nutrients, population obesity rates are increasing. Worldwide, more than a billion adults are overweight, and three hundred million are described as clinically obese. "Obesity is a complex condition with serious social and psychological dimensions, affecting virtually all ages and socioeconomic groups" (Obesity and overweight, WHO, 2009).
Causes and Contributing Factors
Obesity is a multifaceted chronic health problem without one clear cause. Diet, level of activity, and body composition all clearly play a role, but the relative degree and influence of these various contributing factors remains a matter of debate. Genetics may also play a role, as scientists have identified several dozen genes that appear to be connected to human obesity. However, "in most cases, genes involved in weight gain do not directly cause obesity but rather increase the susceptibility to fat gain in subjects exposed to an environment characterized by an abundance of food and limited physical activity" — given that the worldwide rise in obesity has been so swift and sweeping. Alterations in the gene pool could not have occurred so rapidly and thus cannot explain the global rise in obesity (Etiology of obesity, Lifestyle Management of Adult Obesity, 2007).
Current obesity levels range from below 5% in China, Japan, and certain African nations, but even in relatively low-prevalence countries like China, rates are nearly 20% in some cities where the Western diet and sedentary lifestyles have become more common (Obesity and overweight, WHO, 2009). Even in Japan, a nation renowned for its healthy diet, obesity has been on the rise, escalating to 24% of the population over 15, with 29% of Japanese men aged 20 to 60 classified as overweight (McCurry 2006).
Interest Groups and Political Pressures
The epidemic has produced many proposed solutions, none of which are perfect. These range from low-carbohydrate diet advocates to low-fat diet advocates, who often clash in the media. Advocates for more physical education in schools — which has been subject to budget cuts and time constraints in an era where preparing students for standardized tests frequently takes priority over health — and advocates of organic and vegetarian diets all compete in the public arena. Some of the most vocal criticism has been directed at U.S. government agricultural policy. As journalist Michael Pollan observed, "absurdly, while one hand of the federal government is campaigning against the epidemic of obesity, the other hand is actually subsidizing it, by writing farmers a check for every bushel of corn they can grow" (Pollan 2003, p. 2).
While the Department of Health and Human Services promotes a balanced diet, pressure from the Department of Agriculture encourages Americans to consume more food, in line with the interests of U.S. farmers. The Department indirectly encourages, through subsidies, the consumption of obesogenic corn-fed beef and corn-based products containing concentrated, highly caloric sweeteners such as high-fructose corn syrup. Food corporations also have an interest in encouraging individuals to eat more, not less. As a result of such political pressures, "since 1977, an American's average daily intake of calories has jumped by more than 10%. Those 200 or so extra calories have to go somewhere... there is a surfeit of cheap calories that clever marketers sooner or later will figure out a way to induce us to consume" (Pollan 2003, p. 1).
Works Cited
Etiology of obesity. "Lifestyle Management of Adult Obesity." 2007.
Levine, Susan, and Lori Aratani. "Inertia at the Top." The Washington Post. May 19, 2008: A01.
McCurry, Justin. "Japanese Grab Girdles as Obesity Crisis Looms." The Guardian. March 2, 2006.
"Obesity and Overweight." World Health Organization (WHO). 2009.
Pollan, Michael. "The Way We Live Now: 10-12-03; The (Agri)cultural Contradictions of Obesity." The New York Times. October 12, 2003.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.