Animal-Assisted Therapy and the Human-Animal Bond
This paper examines animal-assisted therapy (AAT) as a growing therapeutic modality and its relationship to the broader human-animal bond. It traces the historical use of animals for therapeutic purposes from ancient cultures through modern clinical applications, including equine therapy for veterans with PTSD. The paper also addresses how American society perceives people with disabilities and the stigma they face, contrasting that with the widespread public acceptance of companion animals. Drawing on peer-reviewed literature, the paper argues that AAT's efficacy across physical, occupational, and mental health settings reflects deep-rooted human-animal relationships and warrants broader awareness and adoption.
- Introduction to Animal-Assisted Therapy: Defines AAT and its therapeutic applications
- How Society Views People with Disabilities: Stigma and barriers facing disabled individuals
- Understanding the Human-Animal Bond: Historical and emotional dimensions of human-animal relationships
- Society's View of Using Animals to Help the Disabled: Public acceptance and historical use of AAT
- The Efficacy and Acceptance of AAT: Proven benefits and growing recognition of AAT
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its argument in a wide range of peer-reviewed sources, integrating direct quotations effectively to support each claim without letting them substitute for analysis.
- It moves logically from defining AAT, to examining societal attitudes toward disability, to tracing the historical human-animal bond, and finally to assessing public acceptance — creating a coherent argumentative arc.
- The use of specific historical examples (e.g., John Locke's 1699 recommendation, the 1792 Quaker retreat) adds credibility and depth to the claim that AAT has ancient roots.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective synthesis of sources — drawing on sociology, clinical psychology, social work, and veterinary science to build a multidisciplinary case. Rather than summarizing individual sources in isolation, the writer weaves them together to develop a single cohesive argument about the therapeutic and social value of human-animal relationships.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a definition of AAT and its historical context, then pivots to the social problem of disability stigma to establish why therapeutic interventions are needed. It next builds the theoretical foundation through the concept of the human-animal bond, then returns to the practical question of societal acceptance of AAT. The conclusion synthesizes evidence for AAT's proven efficacy across multiple therapeutic domains.
Introduction to Animal-Assisted Therapy
As a first-order primate, humans have a natural affinity with animals of all types that has contributed to their mutual relationships throughout history. In fact, animals of different types have been used since the time of the ancient Greeks to improve the emotional and functional status of humans (Mccauley, 2006, p. 358). Animal-assisted therapy (AAT) has grown in popularity in recent years based on its proven efficacy in treating a wide range of healthcare and mental health conditions. Although dogs and cats are most commonly used in AAT settings, horses, rabbits, and even fish can also be used. According to Macauley, "The use of animals ranges from companion animals that provide camaraderie and emotional support to assistance animals that provide direct physical-functional support to therapy animals that aid with the habilitation-rehabilitation in physical, occupational, speech-language, and recreation therapy" (2006, p. 358). Moreover, some researchers argue that humans have been forging relationships "since time immemorial" and that animals have served human society in three broad capacities ever since: "as teachers, as healers, and as companions and friends" (Pattnaik, 2004, p. 95).
The use of animals for therapeutic applications is referred to as animal-assisted therapy (AAT), which by definition specifically incorporates animals into the therapeutic process (Chandler & Portrie-Bethke, 2010). The animals used in AAT have a human handler who also serves as a counselor or therapist; the human half of the animal-human AAT duo is responsible for providing compassionate and stimulating counseling to facilitate the recovery of participants (Chandler & Portrie-Bethke, 2010). In this regard, Obrusnikova, Bibik, and Cavalier report that "using therapy dog teams in school and therapeutic settings for children with disabilities is becoming increasingly popular. A therapy dog team consists of a specially trained dog and her or his owner (called a handler)" (2012, p. 37). The animals used in AAT applications typically serve counseling, physical therapy, and occupational therapy contexts (Chandler & Portrie-Bethke, 2010).
How Society Views People with Disabilities
The disabled in American society are akin to the homeless — they are out of sight and out of mind until the problem strikes someone or their families and friends personally. Unfortunately, many disabled people in America are also among the legions of the homeless, making them doubly invisible to American society. People with mental illnesses in particular are stigmatized, and the general feeling exists that these individuals are more of a burden than they are contributing members of society (Stumbo, 2013). In this regard, Ritz reports that "while many members of the community believe that persons who are mentally ill are being taken care of and are adequately accommodated and protected by the law, they are not" (2003, p. 264). According to one clinician's guidance concerning society's view of the disabled: "Stigma involves adverse reactions to the perception of a difference which is negatively evaluated. The adverse reactions to these differences are derived from cultural norms and expectations, and can result in structural disadvantages and psychological distress for individuals who are stigmatized" (Green, 2007, p. 328).
The "out-of-sight, out-of-mind" quality of many disabled people, especially those with mental illnesses, also contributes to their inability to obtain the medical care they need. As Ritz points out, "Persons with mental illness face stigma and severely limited opportunities for medical treatment. Lack of access to basic mental health care is a significant barrier" (2003, p. 264). The implications of these attitudes are severe. Bleich cites "rejecting and alienating attitudes of society towards the disabled in general and the psychiatrically impaired in particular" as rendering the "physically and mentally disabled socially marginal" (2004, p. 235).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.