This paper examines animal-assisted therapy (AAT) as a growing therapeutic modality and its relationship to the broader human-animal bond. It traces the historical use of animals for therapeutic purposes from ancient cultures through modern clinical applications, including equine therapy for veterans with PTSD. The paper also addresses how American society perceives people with disabilities and the stigma they face, contrasting that with the widespread public acceptance of companion animals. Drawing on peer-reviewed literature, the paper argues that AAT's efficacy across physical, occupational, and mental health settings reflects deep-rooted human-animal relationships and warrants broader awareness and adoption.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
The paper demonstrates effective synthesis of sources — drawing on sociology, clinical psychology, social work, and veterinary science to build a multidisciplinary case. Rather than summarizing individual sources in isolation, the writer weaves them together to develop a single cohesive argument about the therapeutic and social value of human-animal relationships.
The paper opens with a definition of AAT and its historical context, then pivots to the social problem of disability stigma to establish why therapeutic interventions are needed. It next builds the theoretical foundation through the concept of the human-animal bond, then returns to the practical question of societal acceptance of AAT. The conclusion synthesizes evidence for AAT's proven efficacy across multiple therapeutic domains.
As a first-order primate, humans have a natural affinity with animals of all types that has contributed to their mutual relationships throughout history. In fact, animals of different types have been used since the time of the ancient Greeks to improve the emotional and functional status of humans (Mccauley, 2006, p. 358). Animal-assisted therapy (AAT) has grown in popularity in recent years based on its proven efficacy in treating a wide range of healthcare and mental health conditions. Although dogs and cats are most commonly used in AAT settings, horses, rabbits, and even fish can also be used. According to Macauley, "The use of animals ranges from companion animals that provide camaraderie and emotional support to assistance animals that provide direct physical-functional support to therapy animals that aid with the habilitation-rehabilitation in physical, occupational, speech-language, and recreation therapy" (2006, p. 358). Moreover, some researchers argue that humans have been forging relationships "since time immemorial" and that animals have served human society in three broad capacities ever since: "as teachers, as healers, and as companions and friends" (Pattnaik, 2004, p. 95).
The use of animals for therapeutic applications is referred to as animal-assisted therapy (AAT), which by definition specifically incorporates animals into the therapeutic process (Chandler & Portrie-Bethke, 2010). The animals used in AAT have a human handler who also serves as a counselor or therapist; the human half of the animal-human AAT duo is responsible for providing compassionate and stimulating counseling to facilitate the recovery of participants (Chandler & Portrie-Bethke, 2010). In this regard, Obrusnikova, Bibik, and Cavalier report that "using therapy dog teams in school and therapeutic settings for children with disabilities is becoming increasingly popular. A therapy dog team consists of a specially trained dog and her or his owner (called a handler)" (2012, p. 37). The animals used in AAT applications typically serve counseling, physical therapy, and occupational therapy contexts (Chandler & Portrie-Bethke, 2010).
The disabled in American society are akin to the homeless — they are out of sight and out of mind until the problem strikes someone or their families and friends personally. Unfortunately, many disabled people in America are also among the legions of the homeless, making them doubly invisible to American society. People with mental illnesses in particular are stigmatized, and the general feeling exists that these individuals are more of a burden than they are contributing members of society (Stumbo, 2013). In this regard, Ritz reports that "while many members of the community believe that persons who are mentally ill are being taken care of and are adequately accommodated and protected by the law, they are not" (2003, p. 264). According to one clinician's guidance concerning society's view of the disabled: "Stigma involves adverse reactions to the perception of a difference which is negatively evaluated. The adverse reactions to these differences are derived from cultural norms and expectations, and can result in structural disadvantages and psychological distress for individuals who are stigmatized" (Green, 2007, p. 328).
The "out-of-sight, out-of-mind" quality of many disabled people, especially those with mental illnesses, also contributes to their inability to obtain the medical care they need. As Ritz points out, "Persons with mental illness face stigma and severely limited opportunities for medical treatment. Lack of access to basic mental health care is a significant barrier" (2003, p. 264). The implications of these attitudes are severe. Bleich cites "rejecting and alienating attitudes of society towards the disabled in general and the psychiatrically impaired in particular" as rendering the "physically and mentally disabled socially marginal" (2004, p. 235).
The practice of using animals to promote the emotional and functional status of humans is ancient, and so too is the human-animal bond. Pattnaik reports that "both ancient and modern cultures emphasize the importance of animals to human society" (2004, p. 95). This bond may have been strengthened early in human history by the practice of feeding cow's milk to human infants, which some researchers believe "created an intense bond between humans and other animals; by seeking the milk of another species to nourish their young, humans were effectively using cattle as wet-nurses" (Swabe, 1999, p. 51).
Other researchers have suggested that animals assumed a protective role for humans thousands of years ago that forged a strong human-animal bond. While the modern human-animal bond does not necessarily involve protection and survival, the bonds that result from these relationships can still be powerful. Toray reports that "although currently that bond may not assure survival, it often results in companionship, unconditional love, and even vital daily assistance for persons with disabilities" (2004, p. 244).
The human-animal bond is unique to the individual and animal involved, and because every patient and animal is different, this bonding experience will also differ in ways that defy ready description and analysis. Risley-Curtiss, Holley, and Wolf (2006) report that "an ever-increasing body of literature suggests that affectionate relationships with animal companions have health-enhancing effects on people and enrich their quality of life" (p. 257). Lawrence emphasizes that "humankind is not the exclusively rational, materialistic being as is sometimes assumed, and our bond with animals emanates partly from the deep levels of our consciousness, originating from the same kind of experience as myth, folklore, and poetry, whose languages are symbolic" (2004, p. 47).
Generally speaking, the term human-animal bond is used to describe the relationships humans have with animals, which are typically companion animals or pets (Toray, 2004). According to Toray, "This bond involves an emotional attachment to a pet as well as a genuine feeling of affection and a responsibility for the well-being of the animal" (2004, p. 245). Differences in the type and level of the human-animal bond are also accentuated by the different types of therapy animals that may be used, including turtles, chicks, rabbits, birds, cats, potbellied pigs, fish (in aquaria), dogs, and horses (Chandler & Portrie-Bethke, 2010, p. 355). Some salient examples of the human-animal bond include: (a) the physical and mental health benefits of companion animals, (b) the place of companion animals in the family system, (c) the significance of cruelty against animals as a predictor of future violent behavior, and (d) the therapeutic impact of animal-assisted therapy across a range of contexts (Evans & Gray, 2012, p. 600).
The depth of the human-animal bond will also depend on the specific animal used in the therapeutic intervention. Chandler and Portrie-Bethke report that "each animal has specific skills, temperaments, and aptitudes that it brings to the therapy environment. For example, dogs are very friendly and facilitate communication and interaction, while horses offer a riding experience that facilitates the normalization of muscle tone" (2010, p. 355). Developing a human-animal bond is especially important for patients who may experience difficulties forging a therapeutic relationship with another individual. Chandler and Portrie-Bethke emphasize that "the power of the client-therapy animal relationship for promoting the therapeutic alliance is particularly notable when clients are unable or unwilling to form a relationship with a human counselor" (2010, p. 355). Likewise, Pattnaik reports that "researchers in the United States have reported a host of benefits that accrue from the child-animal relationship, including the developmental benefits" (2004, p. 96).
You’re 56% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.