This essay examines the writings and activism of Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Amelia Bloomer as central figures in the American women's suffrage movement. Drawing on their published speeches and memoirs, the paper analyzes how each activist grounded her arguments in constitutional principles, linked gender equality to abolitionism, and used civil disobedience to challenge a society that denied women full citizenship. The essay also considers the broader social dimensions of their advocacy — including critiques of marriage, temperance, and systemic oppression — and traces the legacy of suffragist arguments through the later civil rights movement.
Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Amelia Bloomer were all instrumental in shifting the status of women in American society. Their writings reveal the personalities, assumptions, and values of each author. Each of these women took incredible personal risks by challenging the underlying assumption that women were not valid, valuable members of society. The place of women in American society prior to suffrage was little better than domestic servitude. Anthony forever aligns herself with the likes of Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. by using the technique of civil disobedience to achieve social justice. Each of these women recognized the connection between the enslavement of African Americans and the subjugation of women. They each fought for abolition as well as suffrage, and therefore understood that women's rights were human rights.
When Anthony, Stanton, and Bloomer fought for equality, they did so at a time when more than fifty percent of the population was denied civil rights. Each of them saw clearly the problem with failing to uphold the values of the Constitution, drawing from American history to prove their point. Anthony, for example, spoke on behalf of freedom and liberty when she stated, "I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny" (Anthony, 1872).
Bloomer (1895) expressed similar sentiments. Like Anthony, Bloomer argued that it is impossible to be a true American while denying women the right to participate in the political process: "No one who claims to be a republican or lover of freedom at heart can dispute these positions. They are in substance the principles promulgated in the Declaration of Independence, and they form the common basis upon which our national and state governments rest" (Bloomer, 1895). Likewise, Stanton pointed out that the core values of American politics and society were being thwarted by sexism. When Stanton (1898) called for "Liberty to all; national protection for every citizen under our flag; universal suffrage, and universal amnesty," she spoke on behalf of all oppressed citizens of the United States, reflecting her commitments as an abolitionist as well. Anthony, Stanton, and Bloomer each understood that civil disobedience was necessary in order to create a more perfect union.
Based on their ability to organize and coordinate meaningful political action, Anthony, Stanton, and Bloomer understood the American political process even while they were systematically and formally excluded from it. It was not enough for Anthony to disobey the law by voting alone. Had she only done that, she might not have made a strong enough statement to produce massive and meaningful social and political change. Anthony understood that she had to garner support for her position by organizing large groups of people — both men and women — and that she needed to transform the values and norms of society.
Bloomer's writing likewise reflects a desire to transform social norms as well as the political process. Her work shows that she understood how women had been systematically oppressed, and that the inability to vote was merely a symptom of that deeper oppression. In every endeavor, women were belittled and treated like children. "It is not a great many years since women sculptors were unknown, because woman's talent was not encouraged," she observed (Bloomer, 1895). Their views on marriage further demonstrate that these three women sought genuine equality in all spheres of life. Stanton (1898), for instance, states that marriage means "mutual help and happiness and for the development of all that is noblest in each other," and she advocates a woman's ability to extricate herself from a marriage that does not accomplish such noble goals.
"Connection between women's rights and anti-slavery cause"
"Strengths, limits, and assumptions in their reasoning"
"Influence on later civil rights movements"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.