Awakenings Film: Dr. Oliver Sacks and Clinical Ethics
This paper analyzes Penny Marshall's film Awakenings, based on the true story of Dr. Oliver Sacks's experimental work in the 1960s. It examines the fictionalized Dr. Malcolm Sayer's use of L-Dopa to treat catatonic patients at a Bronx psychiatric institution, evaluating the ethical and methodological shortcomings of his informal research approach. The paper discusses Sayer's decision to increase drug dosages without medical board approval, his failure to follow standard clinical assessment procedures, and the resulting inability to replicate findings. It also highlights the historical context of 1960s psychiatric research and acknowledges Sayer's admirable humanistic, patient-centered outlook.
- Introduction: The Film and Its Clinical Context: Film overview and Sayer's experimental approach
- L-Dopa as an Experimental Treatment: L-Dopa trial for catatonic encephalitis patients
- Ethical Concerns: Bypassing the Medical Board: Unauthorized dosage increase and ethical violations
- Methodological Shortcomings in Research Design: Failure to replicate findings and flawed dosing
- Historical Context of 1960s Psychiatric Research: Less formalized standards in 1960s psychiatry
- Patient-Centered Care and Humanistic Outlook: Sayer's optimistic, humane approach to patients
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper balances criticism of Sayer's methodology with genuine appreciation for his humanistic approach, avoiding a one-sided moral judgment.
- It grounds ethical critique in concrete examples — the unauthorized dosage increase, lack of replicable data — rather than abstract principles alone.
- The historical contextualization of 1960s psychiatric norms prevents anachronistic condemnation, showing nuanced thinking about professional standards over time.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates evaluative analysis: it does not merely summarize the film's plot but applies criteria from clinical research ethics and methodology to assess the protagonist's decisions. This technique — using disciplinary standards as an evaluative lens — is a foundational skill in psychology and health-related academic writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a plot summary that contextualizes the experimental design, then transitions into ethical critique of the protagonist's unauthorized decisions, followed by methodological analysis of flawed research practice. It closes by acknowledging the historical setting that partly excuses these shortcomings, then ends on a positive note praising Sayer's patient-oriented outlook. This arc moves from description to critique to qualification — a well-structured analytical progression.
Introduction: The Film and Its Clinical Context
Based on a true story about Dr. Oliver Sacks's work in the 1960s, Penny Marshall's film Awakenings elucidates the challenges of clinical experimental psychology. Dr. Sacks's fictionalized character, Dr. Malcolm Sayer, had worked as a laboratory researcher until he was forced to accept a new position treating catatonic patients at a Bronx mental institution. His relative inexperience in a clinical setting was partly to blame for his somewhat idealistic approach to treating the patients under his care.
L-Dopa as an Experimental Treatment
Sayer attends a conference about new treatments for Parkinson's disease. When he hears about the revolutionary drug L-Dopa, he imagines it might offer a viable treatment for the catatonic patients on his ward, whose symptoms resulted from childhood encephalitis. After applying to the hospital medical board for approval, Sayer is permitted to test the drug on one patient. In addition to administering L-Dopa — initially at 200 mg doses and later at 1,000 mg doses — Sayer and his staff attempt to interact with the patients throughout the course of their treatment. Convinced that somewhere beneath their sleeping exteriors rests a human soul desperate to be released, he tries to "awaken" his subjects by playing ball with them and encouraging them to dance.
The experiment using L-Dopa is portrayed in the film as being carried out rather informally, even haphazardly. While Dr. Sacks might have used more formal methods of tracking patient progress and keeping detailed notes, the fictionalized clinician simply administered the drug and subjectively analyzed results. Moreover, Dr. Sayer increased the dosage without consulting the hospital medical board for approval, simply because results were not forthcoming.
Ethical Concerns: Bypassing the Medical Board
Sayer's decision to increase the dosage without approval from the medical board is understandable but unethical. Hospital administration must be informed of any changes made to patient medical services — both for liability reasons and as a basic safeguard against overdose or dangerous drug side effects, particularly when an experimental substance is involved. While Sayer's intentions are morally upstanding — it is clear that he cares most about the well-being of his patients rather than hospital bureaucracy — he nevertheless needs to follow the rules and guidelines of his profession to avoid serious mishaps.
Sayer's unconventional approach also causes him to neglect the standard procedures for clinical assessment and data analysis that could benefit future research in his field. His failure to adhere to these procedures ultimately compromises the scientific value of his work and limits what other clinicians might learn from his findings.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.