Planning for Behavioral Emergencies on Non-Psychiatric Units
This paper applies the FOCUS and PDCA quality improvement models to the problem of behavioral emergencies occurring on non-psychiatric hospital units, using an ICU scenario involving a patient exhibiting acute psychiatric distress. The paper identifies gaps in staff preparedness, outlines an interdisciplinary improvement team, and proposes a structured training program—ideally delivered by an external firm—to help ICU staff recognize and respond to behavioral and psychiatric crises. It also presents a five-step unit protocol for prescreening patients, maintaining response team visibility, and escalating care appropriately. Plan measurement and evaluation methods, including pre- and post-training assessments and incident report analysis, are discussed to ensure accountability and ongoing improvement.
- Possible Causes and the FOCUS Model: Applies FOCUS model to ICU behavioral emergency gaps
- Organizing the Improvement Team: Forming a cross-departmental hospital improvement team
- Understanding Root Causes: Cause-and-effect analysis of staff unpreparedness
- Improvement Plan and PDCA Framework: PDCA model applied to behavioral training plan
- Implementation and Training: ICU-specific training design and outside firm rationale
- Plan Measurement and Evaluation: Pre/post assessments and incident report review
- Five-Step Unit Protocol: Five actionable steps for behavioral emergency response
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds every recommendation in a recognized quality improvement framework (FOCUS and PDCA), giving the argument a clear, professional structure that readers can follow step by step.
- Integrates peer-reviewed clinical sources (e.g., Tesar & Stern, 1986; Loucks et al., 2010) alongside institutional reports to balance practical guidance with evidence-based credibility.
- Closes with a concrete, numbered protocol that translates the abstract improvement model into actionable, unit-level steps—demonstrating applied rather than purely theoretical thinking.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied problem-solving through a cause-and-effect analytical framework. Rather than simply describing a problem, the author uses each stage of the FOCUS model as a scaffold to diagnose system failures, identify responsible stakeholders, and propose targeted interventions. This structured diagnostic approach is characteristic of healthcare quality improvement writing at the graduate level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by identifying the triggering incident and the relevant FOCUS stages, then moves through team formation, root-cause analysis, and process selection. The second half shifts to the PDCA framework, covering plan design, ICU-specific implementation, measurement via pre/post assessments, outcome evaluation, and a final five-step protocol. References are formatted in APA style.
Possible Causes and the FOCUS Model
Hospital staff are trained to deal with minor behavioral problems because such problems often occur when a patient has experienced a traumatic injury or medical event. Patients confined to an ICU are particularly susceptible to adverse behavioral episodes. Tesar and Stern (1986) identify what should be examined as "(1) the presence of delirium or psychosis; (2) the type of ICU setting (e.g., coronary, surgical, respiratory, or medical); (3) a history of psychiatric disorder; (4) a history of central nervous system disorder; and (5) patients' personalities, which affect their reactions to illness and its treatment." There are many reasons why the ICU staff in this scenario was unprepared for the disruption caused by Mr. X, but by using the FOCUS model — Find a process to improve, Organize a team that knows the process, Clarify current knowledge, Understand causes of process variation, and Select the process improvement — it becomes clear exactly what needs to be done to ensure that the next time such an incident occurs, staff can handle it with greater knowledge and available resources.
The first part of the FOCUS plan is identifying the process to improve, which is evident from the scenario: the ICU staff's ability to deal with patients who have unknown behavioral issues. It can be assumed that the patient has a psychiatric diagnosis that was not apparent to the staff, but that assumption cannot be made initially. The evidence states that Mr. X began the disruption by yelling while on his bed on all fours. His yelling appeared nonsensical — he called out "Help, help" when there was no apparent reason for distress, and said "I don't know" when no question had been posed. Psychiatric staff may have recognized that the patient was disoriented and appeared to be speaking to someone other than the staff, suggesting a possible psychological cause for the outburst. Therefore, to make the process as straightforward as possible initially, the staff needs to understand the signs of a possible psychiatric disorder and how to respond effectively — even if that means calling a rapid response team trained to deal with such emergencies (Loucks et al., 2010). The identified process, then, is that all hospital staff need to recognize a psychiatric emergency and either have sufficient training to respond or have access to a qualified team who can.
It is well established that hospitals will treat individuals in their emergency rooms who have psychiatric disorders (American Hospital Association, 2007b), so a plan must be in place when this occurs. In the case of Mr. X, he was in the ICU and had not been identified from his prior history as having a behavioral disorder, but that did not mean the disorder was absent. To ensure that staff have a recourse when an emergency such as this occurs again — as it most likely will — the hospital must develop a systematic process improvement plan.
References
American Hospital Association. (2007a). Case examples. Behavioral health challenges in the general hospital.
American Hospital Association. (2007b). Recommendations. Behavioral health challenges in the general hospital.
Cooke, M. (2010). The safe management of behavioral health patients in non-behavioral health settings. Alabama Safe Management.
DMHRM. (1997). Management of aggressive behavior. Women and Children's Hospital, Adelaide.
Elson, W. (2006). Restraints and seclusion. Sarasota Memorial Hospital Policy.
Loucks, J., Rutledge, D. N., Hatch, B., & Morrison, V. (2010). Rapid response team for behavioral emergencies. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 16(2), 93–100.
Tesar, G. E., & Stern, T. A. (1986). Evaluation and treatment of agitation in the intensive care unit. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 1(3), 137–148.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.