Bedside Reporting as a Nursing Practice Change: SBART Tool
This paper examines the implementation of bedside shift reporting as a proposed evidence-based practice change in an inpatient hospital setting. The author, a clinical educator, identifies the absence of structured bedside handoffs as a source of medical errors, communication breakdowns, and reduced patient satisfaction. Drawing on five peer-reviewed studies, the paper critiques the evidence supporting bedside reporting and recommends the SBART communication tool as best practice. The Stetler's Model guides the proposed implementation, which includes staff education, pilot metrics using Press Ganey and HCAHPS surveys, and a four-to-five-month execution phase. Barriers such as staff resistance, time constraints, and lack of motivation are addressed alongside key ethical implications, including patient confidentiality under HIPAA.
- Introduction to Bedside Reporting: Defines bedside reporting and its clinical rationale
- Justification for the Proposed Practice Change: Evidence-based reasons for adopting bedside handoffs
- Key Stakeholders in the Nursing Practice: Identifies nurses, educators, operators, and patients
- Evidence Critique and the SBART Tool: Critiques five studies and introduces SBART framework
- Recommended Best Practice and Implementation Model: Stetler's Model guides SBART rollout plan
- Barriers to Successful Implementation: Resistance, time, motivation, and education obstacles
- Ethical Implications and Conclusion: HIPAA, confidentiality, and costs of change
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its practice-change proposal in a concrete clinical problem — the absence of structured bedside handoffs — and sustains a clear problem-solution structure throughout.
- The evidence critique table provides a transparent hierarchy rating for each of the five sources, demonstrating systematic appraisal skills appropriate for translational research work.
- The implementation section is notably practical, specifying group sizes for training sessions, a 40–60-minute session format, survey instruments (Press Ganey, HCAHPS), and a 4–5-month execution timeline, all of which strengthen the proposal's credibility.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper exemplifies translational research writing — the systematic process of moving evidence from the literature into actionable clinical practice. The author synthesizes findings from five studies, assigns evidence levels, maps them to a change model (Stetler's), and then operationalizes the change through stakeholder engagement, metric collection, and staff education planning. This move from "what the evidence says" to "how the organization will do it" is the defining skill of evidence-based practice papers at the graduate level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a problem statement and setting context, followed by a multi-reason justification section. A stakeholder analysis precedes the evidence critique table and its accompanying synthesis. The paper then transitions into recommended practice, the guiding change model, a detailed implementation plan, a barriers analysis, and an ethical implications section before concluding. This logical progression — from problem identification through evidence, planning, obstacles, and ethics — mirrors the structure expected in graduate nursing capstone and translational research assignments.
Introduction to Bedside Reporting
There are numerous areas within nursing that demand change in everyday healthcare practice. More often than not, irrespective of the healthcare setting, an inventive group is required to conduct research and facilitate change. Working as a clinical educator in a hospital context, one encounters numerous practices that require change or upgrading. Subsequent to conducting a review and research analysis, the focus here is on bedside reporting, which is currently lacking within many hospital settings.
Bedside reporting occurs between the outgoing and incoming nurse at a patient's bedside during a shift change. The meeting is designed to facilitate patient engagement in the real-time exchange of information during shift transitions. This provides both the incoming nurse and the patient the opportunity to ask questions and verify significant information regarding the patient's history and care plan before the outgoing nurse departs (Rush, 2012). Most importantly, bedside reporting is in alignment with patient-centered procedures, in contrast to a provider-centered care model, and is anticipated to have a positive impact on organizational nursing output as well as patient satisfaction.
Justification for the Proposed Practice Change
At present, inpatient nursing services involve nurses changing shifts at least two to three times every day. The problem currently being faced is that a significant amount of time is wasted recording patient medical history, diagnosis, and medical status. In addition, the prevailing system of recorded hand-off results in several medical errors within the organization. Some of the medical mistakes currently being experienced include patient blood incompatibility, air embolism, and catheter-associated urinary tract infections. There is also the major problem of communication breakdowns among nurses and between nurses and patients. There is a significant need to introduce bedside reporting, as it will generate considerable benefits (World Health Organization, 2013).
The proposed practice change will enhance patient safety and quality. In particular, bedside reporting presents an opportunity to ensure efficacious communication between nursing personnel, patients, and their immediate families. This practice change will augment patient safety together with service delivery. In addition, enhanced communication during shift reports can help identify and address medical errors. Bedside shift reports will also contribute to a better patient experience of care. In accordance with a report by the World Health Organization (2013), hospitals that implemented bedside reporting demonstrated a rise in patient satisfaction scores and improvements in the nurse-patient relationship. Furthermore, the proposed practice change is expected to produce a significant decrease in the average number of call lights activated by patients at the time of nursing shift changes.
The proposed practice change will also have a constructive impact on the hospital owing to increased nursing staff satisfaction. Nurses are able to visualize their patients more quickly, improved practical learning occurs between senior and newer nurses, and accountability increases. Nurses are also able to communicate more frequently and efficiently, resulting in fewer medical errors. For instance, research conducted by Anderson and Mangino (2006) found that bedside shift reporting produced numerous positive results, including the recovery of hours of incidental time in the initial two pay periods of the study, increased staff satisfaction stemming from patient visualization within 20 to 30 minutes of shift commencement, increased physician satisfaction due to more informed patients, and a general sense of improved patient safety and diagnostic awareness.
Another justification for the proposed practice change encompasses time management and accountability among nurses. In accordance with a report by the World Health Organization (2013), subsequent to executing bedside reporting, nursing staff reported a better capability to prioritize their responsibilities during their shift and a general decline in overtime. One study demonstrated a decline in over-shift time by 100 hours within the first two pay periods on a general surgical unit comprising 32 beds. Another study demonstrated a cost reduction of $8,000 directly linked to a decline in shift reporting time. This indicates the major need for instituting bedside reporting within the hospital, not only to increase nurse accountability and shift efficiency but also to generate cost savings across different medical departments.
Key Stakeholders in the Nursing Practice
Determining the key stakeholders involved in a nursing practice change can be both straightforward and challenging. The aspects taken into consideration when identifying stakeholders include the parties directly affected by the change and those with the authority to implement such change within the healthcare setting. The following individuals have been identified as key stakeholders in the proposed bedside reporting practice change: clinical operators, clinical educators, nurses directly providing patient care, the patients themselves, and the organization as a whole.
Clinical operators will be impacted by the proposed change because they are the supervisors and managers responsible for oversight of clinical personnel. In this regard, clinical operators are responsible for embracing and subsequently carrying out such change within the organization.
Clinical educators within the healthcare setting are responsible for teaching both new and existing personnel about the newly proposed practice change and for offering guiding principles to facilitate its effectiveness. Clinical educators will provide instruction regarding the tools identified by the research. Clinical teaching and education involves the attainment of the skills and capabilities needed to facilitate effective practice in healthcare professions. Changes in curricula or practice for healthcare professionals underscore the progressively greater importance of systematic learning of key skills and demonstration of how to acquire and demonstrate full competency. As a new practice introduced into the hospital setting, clinical educators will be responsible for patient-based and patient-centered teaching and learning, which requires awareness of not only the nurses' learning needs but also the welfare of the patient (Eta et al., 2011).
Nurses are the stakeholders who will be most significantly impacted by the proposed change, as they will be tasked with the primary responsibilities of adopting and practicing bedside reporting on a daily basis. Nurses are responsible for the safe hand-off of the patient between shifts and for including the patient and family in that process. Essentially, nurses are the party responsible for explaining the process, inviting the patient and family to participate in the bedside shift report, and providing the patient with a copy of the bedside report form. Without the nurses' engagement, it would be problematic to assess the efficacy of the change.
Patients are also key stakeholders who will be affected by the practice change. Bedside reporting places patients at the core of care, providing them with a more active role in the care being rendered to them. Patients will largely benefit from the proposed change through increased safety and inclusion in their plan of care. By conducting bedside reporting during the nursing shift change, patients will have the opportunity to ask questions, express their concerns, and communicate care objectives — all phases that increase patient safety.
References
Anderson, C. & Mangino, R. (2006). Nurse shift report: who says you can't talk in front of the patient? Nursing Administration Quarterly, 30(2), 112–122.
Blom, L., Petersson, P., Hagell, P., & Westergren, A. (2015). The situation, background, assessment and recommendation (SBAR) model for communication between health care professionals: a clinical intervention pilot study. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 8(3), 530.
Bradley, S., & Mott, S. (2014). Adopting a patient-centred approach: an investigation into the introduction of bedside handover to three rural hospitals. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(13–14), 1927–1936.
Eta, V. E., Atanga, M. B., Atashili, J., & D'Cruz, G. (2011). Nurses and challenges faced as clinical educators: A survey of a group of nurses in Cameroon. Pan African Medical Journal, 8(1).
Gawlinski, A., & Rutledge, D. (2008). Selecting a model for evidence-based practice changes: A practical approach. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 19(3), 291–300.
Jeffs, L., Acott, A., Simpson, E., Campbell, H., Irwin, T., Lo, J., … & Cardoso, R. (2013). The value of bedside shift reporting: Enhancing nurse surveillance, accountability, and patient safety. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 28(3), 226–232.
Ofori-Atta, J., Binienda, M., & Chalupka, S. (2015). Bedside shift report: Implications for patient safety and quality of care. Nursing2017, 45(8), 1–4.
Rush, S. K. (2012). Bedside reporting: Dynamic dialogue. Nursing Management, 43(1), 40–44.
Spinks, J., Chaboyer, W., Bucknall, T., Tobiano, G., & Whitty, J. A. (2015). Patient and nurse preferences for nurse handover — using preferences to inform policy: a discrete choice experiment protocol. BMJ Open, 5(11), e008941.
Tacia, L., Biskupski, K., Pheley, A., & Lehto, R. H. (2015). Identifying barriers to evidence-based practice adoption: A focus group study. Clinical Nursing Studies, 3(2), 90.
Wallis, L. (2012). Barriers to implementing evidence-based practice remain high for US nurses. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 112(12), 15.
World Health Organization. (2013). Ethical issues in patient safety research: Interpreting existing guidance. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85371/1/9789241505475_eng.pdf
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.