This paper outlines a proposed framework for establishing a Behavioral Science Unit (BSU) within a local sheriff's department, drawing primarily on the Tucson Police Department model described by Russell and Biegel (1990). The paper evaluates the advantages of using an independent contractor psychologist over an in-house hire, addresses the limitations of civilian practitioners working with law enforcement, and advocates for supplementing professional psychological services with peer counseling programs. It also examines the appropriate scope of psychological services, emphasizing crisis intervention and community mental health referrals over long-term treatment or personnel selection roles. The discussion concludes with a recommendation that small departments especially consider the Tucson Model's flexible, outsourced approach.
When considering how to establish a Behavioral Science Unit (BSU) for a local sheriff's office, the most effective approach is to follow the Tucson Model used by the Tucson Police Department and described by Russell and Biegel (1990). According to these authors, the Tucson Police Department's behavioral psychologist was not a member of the force, but worked at the Southern Arizona Mental Health Center, which was a bureau of the State Department of Health Services. His services were outsourced by the state, and because he was not a direct member of the police department, he was able to remain objective.
The Tucson Model offers definite advantages. First, as an independent contractor, the psychologist did not have to answer to anyone in the department — he was essentially autonomous. Therefore, the status of his job was not dependent on his evaluations. As Russell and Biegel (1990) explain, "Although he had to satisfy the chief of police, other command personnel, and the troops themselves, no one in the police department made up his efficiency report or in any way had a direct bearing on whether or not he kept his job. If the contract was not renewed, he was still a full-time employee of the state and would be assigned other duties" (p. 430). Another advantage for a sheriff's department considering this model is that it allows the department to try out different mental health professionals without committing to a long-term contract.
The model is not without drawbacks, however. One concern with a civilian psychologist is that he or she may have difficulty relating to the experiences of officers. No one understands what an officer goes through quite like another officer does. Even though the psychologist would be a civilian, it is therefore important that he or she have extensive experience working with law enforcement personnel. According to John Douglas, former head of the FBI's Investigative Support Unit, "The best way is to work in law enforcement in the capacity of a psychologist and saddle up next to detectives and learn their job. Most medium-to-large police departments and agencies have behavioral science units dealing primarily with police stress and problems from their jobs, which subsequently spills into their personal lives" (Staff, 2007, p. 10). Psychologists working with officers must therefore be well versed in the unique problems that affect the profession.
"Peer counseling programs for officers and recruits"
"Crisis services and community referral coordination role"
"Limited psychologist role in promotions and assignments"
The Tucson Model is recommended as the framework for performing all of the duties described above. It is particularly important for small police departments or sheriff's offices to consider this model, since services involved in selection, training, and counseling may be needed more in small departments than in large ones. As Russell and Biegel (1990) point out, "If one person is ineffective in a ten-person department, it will be more devastating than if one person is ineffective in a two thousand-person department" (p. 431). The Tucson Model's combination of professional independence, community resource integration, and peer support provides a practical and cost-effective foundation for any small department seeking to address the psychological demands of law enforcement work.
You’re 54% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.