Fighting in the Jim Crow Army: Black Soldiers in WWII
This paper reviews Maggi Morehouse's Fighting in the Jim Crow Army: Black Men and Women Remember World War II (2007), examining the experiences of Black soldiers serving in the racially segregated U.S. Army during World War II. Drawing on the personal testimonies of veterans from the 92nd and 93rd Infantry Divisions, the paper explores how the legacy of Plessy v. Ferguson shaped military policy, limited Black participation in combat roles, and undermined unit morale and effectiveness. Topics covered include loyalty and resistance among Black servicemen, conditions at Fort Huachuca, discriminatory command structures, and the eventual — if belated — desegregation of the armed forces under President Truman in 1947.
- Introduction: Segregation and the WWII Army: Plessy v. Ferguson's impact on military segregation
- Black Loyalty and Resistance to Service: Patriotism and opposition among Black servicemen
- Representation and Rank in the Segregated Army: Underrepresentation and limits on Black officers
- Life and Discipline at Fort Huachuca: Conditions, disease, and disorder at the base
- Combat Roles of the 92nd and 93rd Divisions: Battlefield deployment and white command failures
- Conclusion: Legacy of Jim Crow in the Military: Truman's desegregation and the war's lasting injustice
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its analysis in direct quotations from Morehouse's oral history sources, giving the review a vivid, evidence-based quality that illustrates the human cost of segregation policy.
- It balances institutional critique (military policy, command structure) with personal testimony (Johnson, Perry, Peery, Stephenson), demonstrating that both systemic and individual dimensions matter.
- The review maintains a clear evaluative thread — attributing the 92nd Division's underperformance not to the soldiers themselves but to the racist framework imposed upon them — which shows critical engagement with the author's argument.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates effective use of source-integrated quotation as evidence. Rather than simply paraphrasing Morehouse, the writer embeds specific page-referenced quotations from both the book's argument and the veterans' testimonies, then briefly contextualizes each quotation to advance the review's analytical points. This technique is essential in book reviews and literature-based papers at the undergraduate level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with historical context (Plessy v. Ferguson) and a statement of scope, then moves thematically through loyalty and resistance, institutional representation, daily life at Fort Huachuca, and battlefield deployment. The conclusion synthesizes Morehouse's central argument — that systemic racism, not soldier capability, explains the 92nd Division's limited battlefield record — before situating it within Truman's 1947 desegregation order. The structure follows the book's own arc while grouping related evidence under coherent analytical themes.
Introduction: Segregation and the WWII Army
Maggi Morehouse (2007) argues early in Fighting in the Jim Crow Army that the Plessy v. Ferguson decision of 1896, wherein America codified "separate-but-equal," was still in full effect by the time of World War II. The effects of that Supreme Court ruling would impact the lives of Black Americans for the next half century — especially in the armed forces, which remained segregated until 1947. Morehouse details the trials and complications faced by Black soldiers in the segregated Army, as remembered by the Black men and women who lived through those times. This review examines the most significant aspects of Morehouse's work and provides a close look at the stories that shaped the people and the structure of the 92nd and 93rd all-Black active Infantry Divisions.
Morehouse asserts from the outset that the policy of segregation "failed to produce military efficiency" (p. 4). Not only was it demoralizing, but it also added an economic burden to the military system, as separate buildings and facilities had to be constructed — such as those at Fort Huachuca. When Representative Hamilton Fish introduced a bill in 1940 that "allowed the president to assign men — white or black — to various units within the army," Secretary of War Harry Woodring objected that such a measure would demoralize troops and weaken the military infrastructure (p. 4). While Congress stalled on permitting Blacks to serve alongside whites, the number of Black soldiers who saw active duty remained significantly lower than the proportion of Black people in the general population.
Reference
Morehouse, M. (2007). Fighting in the Jim Crow Army: Black Men and Women Remember World War II. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.