Change Theory and Transformational Leadership in Nursing
This paper examines how a nurse manager can implement a shift-to-shift reporting change—moving from the break room to the patient bedside—using transformational leadership and Kurt Lewin's three-stage change theory. The paper argues that transformational leadership is well-suited to this initiative because it motivates staff to act beyond self-interest for patient welfare. Lewin's "Unfreeze–Change–Refreeze" framework provides a structured process for overcoming natural resistance, codifying new practices, and sustaining the change. The paper also highlights the importance of soliciting stakeholder feedback and securing top-down organizational support throughout the change process.
- Introduction: Overview of the bedside reporting change initiative
- Transformational Leadership: Rationale and Application: Why transformational leadership suits this nursing change
- Kurt Lewin's Change Theory: Rationale and Application: Lewin's Unfreeze-Change-Refreeze model explained
- Applying Lewin's Theory to Bedside Shift Reporting: Mapping Lewin's stages onto the reporting transition
- Conclusion: Synthesis of leadership and change theory findings
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It clearly connects a specific clinical problem—break-room handoff reporting—to both a leadership style and a theoretical framework, demonstrating applied rather than abstract thinking.
- It uses direct quotations from foundational sources (Bass, Avolio, Rosch) to anchor claims, lending academic credibility to what could otherwise be purely anecdotal reasoning.
- The "what's in it for me" framing acknowledges the human dimension of organizational change, making the argument pragmatic and persuasive.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates theory-to-practice application: it introduces a theoretical model (Lewin's Unfreeze–Change–Refreeze), explains its logic, and then maps each stage onto a real nursing workflow change. This move—from abstract framework to concrete operational context—is a foundational skill in applied healthcare and management writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief problem statement and roadmap, then dedicates one section each to the leadership style and the change theory before combining both in an application section. A conclusion synthesizes key findings. This four-part structure (rationale → theory → application → synthesis) is a reliable and clear pattern for applied health-sciences essays at the undergraduate level.
Introduction
In response to a request from a nurse manager to select a team of nurses to assist in implementing a long-needed policy change, it is necessary to change the manner in which the nursing staff performs shift-to-shift reporting. At present, nurses report to one another in the break room, and the nurse manager has decided that within the next two weeks the nursing unit will transition to reporting endorsed at the bedside. This paper describes how a project manager should approach this change using a transformational leadership style to guide the process, and how Kurt Lewin's change theory can be used to support the implementation. A summary of key findings concerning transformational leadership and Lewin's change theory is provided in the conclusion.
Transformational Leadership: Rationale and Application
Transformational leadership was selected to implement the change to shift-to-shift nursing report at the bedside. As the term connotes, transformational leaders "transform" their organizations from their existing state to a desired state (Bass, 1998), making this leadership style especially appropriate for the change in shift-to-shift reporting. Avolio and Bass (2002) point out that transformational leaders "motivate their associates, colleagues, followers, clients, and even their bosses to go beyond their individual self-interests for the good of the group, organization, or society" (p. 2).
Because people naturally tend to resist change, it is important for any leadership approach to reinforce the need for change in order to motivate others to make the personal investments in time and effort required to accomplish it—making transformational leadership an optimal approach. One of the best strategies for achieving this outcome is the active and enthusiastic solicitation of feedback from those who will be most affected by the change initiative (Bass, 2002).
Kurt Lewin's Change Theory: Rationale and Application
Kurt Lewin's change theory can be summarized by the now-famous dictum, "Unfreeze – Change – Refreeze" (Rosch, 2002, p. 8). Most managers recognize the challenges involved in implementing any change to their subordinates' day-to-day routines, because resistance is a natural human reaction. Most people genuinely resist changes to their daily routine, as such changes require a personal investment in time and effort that may yield uncertain results. Lewin's change theory therefore maintains that the current shift-to-shift reporting regimen must first be unfrozen, a meaningful change implemented, and that change then formally adopted and codified.
Notwithstanding a change manager's best efforts, empirical observation and experience confirm that implementing and sustaining meaningful organizational change is fraught with unexpected perspectives from stakeholders that may not have been apparent at the outset. Rosch (2002) emphasizes that, "While someone may start out with a plan to implement a change in an organization, it rapidly becomes subject to and changed by the unfolding situation. As the process unfolds, new actors emerge, and known ones may wax and wane in significance" (p. 9). Some variables that play a pivotal role may not have occurred to the change manager at all; however, Lewin and like-minded organizational behavioral theorists maintain that it is essential to overcome initial reluctance to change by emphasizing the "what's in it for me" aspects of the proposed changes (Rosch, 2002).
Conclusion
Although people resist change naturally, the research shows that it is possible to facilitate organizational change—in healthcare environments in particular—by using a transformational leadership style as articulated by Bass and colleagues, and a structured framework as proposed by Lewin for effectively changing organizations. One overarching theme that emerged from the research was the need to solicit feedback from stakeholders most affected by change initiatives. This basic need was also shown to require ongoing commitment and support from the top down in order to promote the successful outcome of any organization-wide change initiative. Together, transformational leadership and Lewin's change management model offer a coherent and practical roadmap for transitioning nursing staff to bedside shift-to-shift reporting.
References
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2002). Developing potential across a full range of leadership: Cases on transactional and transformational leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Letvak, S. (2014, September). Overview and summary: Healthy nurses—perspectives on caring for ourselves. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 19(3), 117–120.
Rosch, E. (2002, Summer). Lewin's field theory as situated action in organizational change. Organization Development Journal, 20(2), 8–11.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.