This essay argues that Christian values obligate believers in the United States to actively support environmental protection, regardless of the conservative political affiliations that have historically defined much of American Christianity. Drawing on scriptural principles, the suffering of the global poor caused by industrial pollution, and the United States' failure to lead on international climate agreements such as the Kyoto Protocol, the paper makes the case that environmental stewardship is inseparable from Christian moral duty. It also addresses a key counterargument — that tying scripture too closely to environmentalism risks theological distortion — while ultimately concluding that the stakes are too high for Christians to remain on the political sidelines.
Without a doubt, one of the greatest challenges before us as a civilization in the 21st century is the protection and repair of our environment. This is an ambition that cuts across ideologies, scriptures, and traditions of faith, dictating a collective responsibility to an admittedly enormous task. For Christians in particular, the onus of responsibility to protect God's Earth should be seen as second to nothing in terms of its importance and its consistency with the Christian value system. Ironically, in the United States, sharp political lines of allegiance undermine what should be an inextricable link between the Christian faith and the environmental movement.
Christian values have long instructed believers to reach out to the hungry, poor, and oppressed — to bring them ease, improve their conditions, and help them feel the love of God. The connection between the environmental abuses wrought by global industrialization and the suffering of the world's poor and disenfranchised citizens is a clear one. This alone should inform the actions of the Christian community, which must detach itself from many of the associations that accompany its relationship with America's political right wing. Because this political disposition often calls for a rejection of environmentalist values, it is ill-suited to the Christian worldview.
Though there are many points of common ground between Christianity and the Republican Party, environmental values are not among them. If there is a meaningful overlap between Christian moral values and the social agenda of the conservative political core, there is no relevance in either Christian scripture or theology to justify the continued destruction of our air, soil, and oceans in favor of economic gain. As Peritore (1999) argues, the environmental movement "is more fundamental than a culture shift because it is based on serious global threats to life on this planet. Ideologies may surge and flow across the face of these realities, but environmental issues cannot be argued or deconstructed away" (Peritore, 30).
This is an important point in the discussion, lending the basic understanding that the need to extend environmental protections into developing nations — as one important political objective — is not simply an appendage of the so-called liberal agenda. Quite to the contrary, this is a fight that concerns all parties. In terms of taking action, the historical connection between the Christian identity and the conservative political parties of the United States should no longer be considered a determinant force in our position on matters of the environment. Rather, the seriousness of our environmental plight and our spiritual connection to the Earth should help us urge the conservative political agenda to embrace restoration, conservation, preservation, and a sustainable way of living.
Evidence suggests that Christian community groups and coalitions are increasingly coming to recognize the importance of their role in fighting to save the environment — and with this recognition has come something of an independent streak from their long-standing Republican connections. As Tiansay (2001) reports, "the National Council of Churches, the country's largest coalition of Protestant and Orthodox Christian denominations, is in the process of lobbying for national and international action on global warming. Meanwhile, in Southern California, a group called Christians Caring for Creation is suing the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to protect the endangered Alameda whipsnake and arroyo toad. In the Bible Belt, local preachers are spearheading a grassroots campaign to save the Southern forests from chip mills" (Tiansay, 1).
These efforts represent the push for Christians to take up their rightful responsibility for the Earth in spite of conservative political leanings. Across denominations and regions, faith communities are finding ways to act on environmental convictions that align with core Christian teachings about creation care and human dignity.
"US rejection of climate treaty and Christian responsibility"
"Scripture and suffering ground environmental ethics"
"Engaging theological objections to Christian environmentalism"
Certainly, the risk of undermining the scriptures is one that the Christian Church must take seriously. So too must Christians take the risk of altering longstanding political affiliations. The Christian faith in the United States must take the high road by choosing to protect our Earth over its political friendships.
You’re 54% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.