Co-Teaching Strategies: Planning, Communication, and Collaboration
This paper reviews Murawski and Dieker's (2008) article on co-teaching strategies for inclusive classrooms, where a general education teacher and a special education services provider work side by side. The review examines four core principles: the necessity of professional training and planning before co-teaching begins, the reorganization of conventional teaching methods to address diverse learners (high-achieving, average, low-achieving, and other students), the dynamic and iterative nature of the co-teaching process, and the critical role of communication between co-teachers. The paper concludes with a personal reflection on applying these principles to foster genuine professional partnership in the classroom.
- Introduction to Co-Teaching: Defines co-teaching and stresses importance of planning
- Planning and Restructuring the Classroom: Reorganizing methods and addressing diverse learner needs
- The Dynamic Nature of Co-Teaching: Iterative adjustments, data collection, and ongoing evaluation
- Making Learning Engaging: Games, peer tutoring, and fun classroom strategies
- The Role of Communication in Co-Teaching: Shared responsibility and professional teacher communication
- References: Source citation for Murawski and Dieker 2008
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Organizes the source article's advice into a clear, logical sequence of stages — before, during, and after co-teaching — making the review easy to follow.
- Integrates direct quotations and page-specific citations appropriately to support each key point without over-relying on quotation.
- Closes with a personal reflection that grounds the review in practical classroom experience, demonstrating engagement beyond surface summary.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper models how to write a structured article review by identifying and paraphrasing the source's main arguments in sequence, using signal phrases to attribute ideas, and concluding with a critical or personal synthesis rather than simple repetition of the source.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by defining the co-teaching relationship and introducing the source. It then addresses four main themes from the article — planning, classroom restructuring, iterative adjustment, and engagement — before synthesizing these with an emphasis on communication. A brief personal application closes the review, followed by a single reference entry in APA format.
Introduction to Co-Teaching
A co-teaching relationship exists when a mainstream teacher and a special education services provider — such as a special education teacher or a speech pathologist — teach side by side in a diverse classroom that includes both students with special needs and general education students. However, these relationships can frequently be strained and ineffective. In their article 50 Ways to Keep Your Co-Teacher: Strategies for Before, During, and After Co-Teaching, Murawski and Dieker (2008) stress the need for proper planning to make such a relationship work well. Teachers need to be trained to make the relationship functional, as this does not occur intuitively. As the authors note, "seizing opportunities for staff development in-service training and workshops is helpful, as is reading books and articles that focus on the collaborative relationship in inclusive classrooms" (Murawski & Dieker, 2008, p. 41).
Planning and Restructuring the Classroom
A second key idea is that co-teaching requires substantive reorganization of conventional teaching methods. The co-teacher cannot simply be inserted into an existing classroom structure. Often this may mean splitting the regular classroom into smaller groups. Parents should also be informed about the nature of the co-teaching relationship, and teachers should be aware that not all students may necessarily flourish in the co-teaching environment, depending upon their individual needs.
The instructional plan should address diverse learning needs and include components for High-achieving (H), Average-achieving (A), Low-achieving (L), and Other (O) students (Murawski & Dieker, 2008, p. 42). This does not mean that all conventional wisdom about teaching should be discarded — the authors stress the value of repetition and other time-tested strategies — but the team-taught classroom has its own needs and structure that must be acknowledged and planned for accordingly.
The Dynamic Nature of Co-Teaching
Co-teaching is a dynamic process. After the initial implementation, some modifications may be necessary to address the needs of learners. Teachers should discuss how to make changes after the first sessions and come to an agreement about how to grade students more effectively. The authors emphasize the need to keep abreast of current educational literature on differentiated instruction and to evaluate the effectiveness of the processes being used. Online resources offer a wide range of materials useful for educators today. Collecting data on the class periodically is also necessary to ensure that the educational process remains successful over time.
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
24-Hour Pass
Does not renew
Get 24-Hour PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 1 during the 24-Hour Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.