Computer-Based Training vs. Traditional Methods in the Navy
This paper examines computer-based training (CBT) as an alternative to traditional instructional methods, with a particular focus on the U.S. Navy's adoption of CBT under its Revolution in Training initiative. The paper reviews the advantages and limitations of CBT, including cost efficiency, self-paced learning, and improved long-term retention, while also addressing persistent challenges such as outdated hardware, lack of standardization, and misalignment with sailor work requirements. Drawing on empirical studies and Navy Inspector General findings, the paper explores how human systems integration domains — specifically human factors engineering, manpower, and training — can inform the design of more effective CBT programs. The paper concludes by proposing testable hypotheses about whether CBT, enhanced by human factors principles, yields statistically significant improvements in academic outcomes.
- Introduction: CBT overview, advantages, and learning outcomes
- Background: The Navy's Revolution in Training: Navy's CBT adoption and Revolution in Training mandate
- Problem Statement: Navy CBT gaps: standardization, funding, alignment
- Literature Review: Empirical studies comparing CBT and traditional instruction
- Three Human Systems Domains: Human factors, manpower, and training domain framework
- Hypotheses and Proposed Study: Formal hypotheses on CBT and human factors outcomes
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper integrates a substantial body of empirical literature — including controlled studies comparing CBT and lecture formats — with primary-source government documents such as the Naval Inspector General's report, lending credibility to its claims.
- It maintains a clear organizational logic, moving from general advantages of CBT to Navy-specific context, then to identified problems, existing research, theoretical frameworks, and finally hypotheses — each section building naturally on the last.
- The inclusion of direct quotations from senior naval officers grounds abstract policy discussions in real institutional priorities, making the stakes of the research concrete and persuasive.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective literature synthesis: rather than summarizing sources in isolation, it weaves together findings from multiple studies to identify patterns, contradictions, and gaps. For example, it contrasts Williams and Zahed's (1996) finding of superior CBT retention with Bowman et al.'s (2009) evidence of adverse Navy-specific factors, then uses both to motivate the study's hypotheses. This technique shows readers how prior research creates a justification for new investigation.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a research proposal structure: an introduction establishing CBT's relevance, a background section situating the Navy's institutional context, a problem statement identifying specific failures, a literature review synthesizing empirical and theoretical sources, a conceptual framework section on human systems integration domains, and a hypotheses section formalizing the research questions. This sequence mirrors standard social science proposal conventions and guides the reader logically from context to proposed inquiry.
Introduction
Innovations in information and telecommunications technologies have introduced a wide array of new opportunities for educational applications, including computer-based training. A white paper published by the e-learning vendor Saba Software emphasizes that "organization after organization embraced the new technology hoping to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of learning" (Next generation e-learning and the road to human capital development and management, 2001, p. 3). One of the most popular approaches to emerge from these innovations has been computer-based training (CBT). As the term implies, computer-based training is provided using a computer as the main medium, either in a standalone setting or an electronic classroom environment.
The advantages of CBT are numerous and broad-based. By delivering subject matter content using a computer, students are able to learn at their own pace, and this alternative to traditional training methods can also be highly cost-effective compared to traditional classroom environments. Moreover, studies have demonstrated that students learn as well or better with CBT compared to traditional training methods; in some cases they learn faster (Henderson, 1992) and remember what they have learned for longer periods of time (Williams & Zahed, 1996).
Despite the advantages that can accrue from the use of CBT, there are a number of challenges and constraints involved in providing effective instruction that must be taken into account when formulating CBT alternatives to traditional training methods. Foremost among these constraints is the readiness of the student to use these alternative learning tools and the expertise of the instructor in developing effective ways to deliver subject matter content that is aligned with organizational goals.
Background: The Navy's Revolution in Training
Completed in August 2001, the Navy's Revolution in Training initiative was a response to findings that emerged from the Executive Review of Naval Training (ERNT). This executive review was a comprehensive analysis of the Navy's training and education of service members over the entire course of their naval careers (Manacapilli, Bennett, Galway & Weed, 2003). According to these authorities, "The review was designed to examine Navy training and make substantive recommendations for improving and aligning organizations, incorporating new technologies into Navy training, exploiting opportunities available from the private sector, and developing a continuum of lifelong learning and personal and professional development for sailors" (Manacapilli et al., 2003, p. 80).
Based on the mandates required by the Navy's Revolution in Training initiative, technological innovations must be incorporated into training opportunities for naval personnel, with CBT being the primary method by which these mandates are achieved (Dye, 2004). The integration of CBT in response to these mandates is based in large part on its perceived ability to deliver training faster and more cost-effectively. In this regard, Hayes (2008) reports that "a principal aim of the Navy's 'revolution in training' has been to identify the competencies associated with each job in the Navy in order to refine and systematically engineer measurable training programs to produce readiness. Education too is viewed in this vein" (p. 78). In his assessment of the implications of the Revolution in Training for fleet readiness capabilities, the Commander, Naval Education and Training Command, cited the importance of cost savings that can be realized through improved training methods. According to Vice Admiral J. Kevin Moran, "With the prevalent time-is-money mentality in the Navy, getting sailors back to their posts quickly is a key goal of the educational initiative. This means a minimal amount of time in our part of the organization. Time spent in a classroom comes out of the individual's account. That's a bundle of money" (quoted in Hayes, 2008, p. 78).
The United States Navy already relies heavily on computer-based training and has done so for a relatively long time, and all signs indicate that current trends in the use of this alternative to traditional training methods — such as stand-up lectures and hands-on exploratory methods — will continue to expand in the future (Desai, Richards & Eddy, 2000). According to the Naval Inspector General's Report to the Secretary of the Navy (2009), "We defined CBT as individual or group self-paced instruction using a computer as the primary training medium, to include web-delivered Navy E-Learning. By this definition, CBT accounts for one-third (34%) of instruction at Navy 'A' Schools, 15–33% at schools of the Officer Training Command and 100% of instruction for Navy annual training requirements" (Computer-based training, p. ii). Furthermore, the Navy has more than 26,000 computer workstations already in place in its network of electronic classrooms that deliver computer-based training, but much of this hardware is aging or obsolete (Computer-based training, 2009). The Navy also suffers from a number of other constraints to the effective use of its CBT resources, which are discussed further below.
Problem Statement
Despite its enormous investment of resources in CBT and the importance of the training that is involved, the U.S. Navy continues to experience significant problems with this training alternative, including a lack of standardization of program content, obsolete delivery systems, and inadequate funding. Furthermore, learning theory principles are frequently not considered in the instructional design used by these alternative computer-based training methods (Computer-based training, p. ii). Other problems identified by the Naval Inspector General included a lack of funding needed to maintain CBT courses and keep them timely and aligned with organizational goals, insufficient bandwidth that created significant time delays in loading course materials, and the lengthy amounts of time required to update CBT curricular offerings when funding was available.
Because resources are by definition scarce, it is important for the U.S. armed forces to take advantage of CBT's attributes in providing service members with the training they need to achieve their missions and remain combat ready. The Naval Inspector General also identified a lack of alignment between current CBT curricular offerings and "sailor work" (p. ii), as well as finding that even though young naval personnel may be "digital natives," many do not possess the background or expertise needed to use CBT to its maximum advantage. The report emphasized that members of Generation Y who are now entering the service have been assumed to possess the skill set needed to benefit from CBT. However, the findings showed that "Generation Y users acknowledged they were comfortable using computers. However, while they enjoyed using computers for communication, entertainment, and social networking, they did not view CBT as an enhancement over interaction with an experienced instructor or hands-on training" (pp. 5–6).
Furthermore, in an effort to adopt CBT rapidly, many traditional Navy training programs were simply converted to CBT formats with little or no front-end analysis concerning their effectiveness or efficiency prior to implementation (Computer-based training, 2009, p. 3). According to Bowman, Crawford, and Mehay (2009), "The Navy, like other organizations, has a history of converting traditional classroom training to various forms of mediated instruction, including CBT, to reduce costs and provide learning at any time and any place. Yet, many prior studies have questioned whether using CBT is associated with a reduction in the quality of instruction" (p. 11). Likewise, Kraiger (2002) emphasizes that "although there is some evidence that computer-based training can reduce long-term training costs for certain courses and reduce training time for learners, lingering questions about how to implement it effectively in organizations remain" (p. 193). Moreover, there also remains a lack of valid metrics by which CBT training can be measured against traditional training methods (Computer-based training, 2009). Determining when and why CBT instruction is most effective therefore represents a timely and valuable enterprise.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.