COVID-19 Health Disparities Among Essential Workers in the US
This paper reviews a peer-reviewed study published in BMC Public Health examining the disproportionate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on low-income essential workers in the United States. Using data from a self-administered online survey of 2,845 employed American adults collected in April 2020, the original researchers applied hierarchical generalized linear models to assess differences in protective behavior adoption across income and employment categories. This review evaluates the study's methodology, literature review quality, principal findings, and limitations. The review finds that essential workers faced compounded disadvantages — including income loss, food insecurity, and reduced ability to practice recommended hygiene precautions — and concludes with a discussion of the study's policy implications and the persistent failure to address structural health disparities in American workplaces.
- Introduction and Problem Statement: COVID-19's disproportionate impact on essential workers
- Study Hypotheses and Theoretical Framework: Two hypotheses grounded in Health Belief Model
- Methodology and Data Collection: Online survey of 2,845 adults, April 2020
- Quality of the Literature Review: Brief but useful review with employment barrier graphic
- Results and Principal Findings: Essential workers faced income loss and hygiene barriers
- Conclusions, Limitations, and Discussion: Policy gaps, sampling limits, and ongoing disparities
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The structured article-review format — covering abstract, methodology, literature quality, results, and discussion — gives readers a clear, organized evaluation of the source study.
- The reviewer goes beyond summary by critically identifying a methodological limitation the original authors omitted: that lower-income essential workers likely had reduced access to the social media platform used for recruitment, skewing the sample.
- The closing discussion connects empirical findings to broader socioeconomic critique, noting the irony that workers labeled "essential" remain among the most economically vulnerable and least protected by policy.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates critical article review technique: the student does not simply paraphrase the source study but evaluates it across multiple dimensions — rigor of the literature review, appropriateness of the methodology, internal consistency of results, and adequacy of the authors' own limitations discussion. Identifying a limitation the original authors failed to report is a particularly strong example of independent critical analysis.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a condensed abstract of the source article, then moves through a formal introduction, hypothesis summary, methodology overview, literature review evaluation, results summary, and a concluding discussion. This mirrors a standardized article-critique format common in public health and social science coursework, making the organizational logic easy to follow and academically appropriate.
Introduction and Problem Statement
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affected American workers who occupy essential occupations but are paid disproportionately less than most non-essential workers. In addition, the working conditions of essential workers limited their ability to engage in protective behaviors and to use protective gear.
The overarching purpose of the study under review was to analyze the relationship between worker economic status and employment conditions and the use of protective behaviors during the beginning stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, in order to confirm or refute the two hypotheses described below.
Study Hypotheses and Theoretical Framework
The study was guided by two hypotheses:
Hypothesis 1: Knowledge of recommended COVID-19 protective behaviors and COVID-19 threat perception are positively associated with engagement in such protective behaviors, such as frequent handwashing.
Hypothesis 2: Adoption of protective behaviors related to social distancing — such as staying at home — is determined by employment conditions. Specifically, from the perspective of the Health Belief Model (HBM), employment conditions impede self-efficacy for engaging in certain COVID-19 protective behaviors but not others.
Methodology and Data Collection
This was a quantitative study that used a social media platform for recruitment purposes. A total of 2,845 working American adults completed a self-administered online survey in April 2020. The authors employed hierarchical generalized linear models to analyze differences in the use of recommended protective gear and behaviors across workers' employment status and working conditions, controlling for the perceived threat of COVID-19 and worker knowledge as predicted by the HBM.
Results and Principal Findings
Both hypotheses were confirmed. The lower-income essential workers (42%) who participated in the study were at greater risk of suffering lost income due to COVID-19 compared to non-essential workers with paid sick leave, and 15% were food insecure as a result. In sum, essential workers faced multiple challenges in their workplaces as well as an inability to remain at home due to their need for income. Non-essential workers were also more likely to engage in protective behaviors — such as handwashing and wearing a mask — compared to essential workers, who were 70% less likely to do so due to the nature of their employment.
The results of this study were congruent with a growing body of evidence concerning the plight of essential workers during pandemic conditions. Not only do essential workers encounter more constraints to their use of protective gear, they are at far greater risk of experiencing income loss and food insecurity compared to non-essential workers. Based on these findings, the authors conclude that more informed policy responses are needed to help reduce health disparities among a large percentage of the American population.
References
[1] Capasso A, Kim S, Ali SH, Jones AM, DiClemente RJ, Tozan Y. Employment conditions as barriers to the adoption of COVID-19 mitigation measures: how the COVID-19 pandemic may be deepening health disparities among low-income earners and essential workers in the United States. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1–13.
[2] Obinna DN. Essential and undervalued: health disparities of African American women in the COVID-19 era. Ethnicity & Health. 2021;26(1):68–79.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.