This paper examines the multifaceted concept of cybercrime, addressing the ongoing debate over whether it represents a new form of crime or simply traditional crime facilitated by computers. It outlines the two broad categories of cybercrime — those using computers as a tool and those targeting computers directly — and discusses the legal challenges stemming from the lack of a universal definition. The paper then presents the components of a comprehensive cybercrime prevention program, covering physical security, access control, password policies, organizational strategies, collaborative efforts among ISPs and non-governmental organizations, and internet governance. It also highlights the challenges public police face in keeping pace with rapidly evolving cybercriminal methods.
Cybercrime is a concept that has never been comprehensively defined using a single, universal definition. It can be used to refer to a criminal offence that involves the use of a computer as the main object of committing a crime, or as the tool used to commit a substantive material component of a given criminal offence (Kowalski, 2002). Some criminal justice professionals consider cybercrime to be a new and emerging form of crime, while others disagree and view it as a traditional crime committed using computers. This paper examines both perspectives and then presents a discussion of the steps and processes that should be considered in developing a comprehensive cybercrime prevention program.
Cybercrimes fall under two broad categories (Davis and Hutchison, 1997). The first is defined as the use of a computer as a tool in committing a crime. This category is made up of crimes that various law enforcement agencies have been tackling in the physical world but are now being observed at an elevated frequency over the internet. Some of these forms of crime include criminal harassment, child pornography, intellectual property violation, fraud, and the sale of banned substances and materials. This reveals that cybercrime does indeed entail components of traditional crime that are simply committed using computers.
The second category is defined by the fact that the computer is the object of the crime itself. This aspect of cybercrime encompasses specific crimes that deal with computers and computer networks, and can be classified as new crimes related to computer technology and the internet. Examples include hacking, defacing of websites, unauthorized access to computer systems, and the creation and dissemination of computer worms and viruses. This means that cybercrime has no single distinct character in terms of age — its components are derived from both traditional crimes and new and emerging crimes committed over the internet.
Risteski (2003) pointed out that the frequency of cybercrime is forty times greater when compared to other classical crimes. Furthermore, 90% of cybercrimes are practically undetectable, making it a particularly difficult crime to address since the detection and production of conclusive evidence is very challenging. Kowalski (2002) also notes that beyond cybercrime, there are related offences such as "computer-supported crime," which describes the use of computer technology by criminals for the purposes of communication and the storage of documents and data.
Vogel (2007) points out that there are several legal challenges associated with cybercrime. The first concerns the lack of an adequate definition of cybercrime as well as specific cyber offences. Cyber technology is developing rapidly and at a phenomenal pace, which means new offences are constantly emerging and existing definitions are continually changing as the parameters of cybercrime and related offences evolve. These changes correspond to shifts in the methods and patterns of harmful and abusive activities related to information systems.
Legal instruments should never be too rigid in their definition of cybercrime by using overly determinate terms. Instead, definitions should be framed within a structure that allows for a degree of openness, vagueness, and flexibility. The central legal challenge is for the existing criminal justice system to balance that requirement against the foreseeability demanded by law and the constitutional prohibition of vague or indeterminate offences. This balancing act remains one of the most pressing concerns for legislators and legal scholars engaged with cybercrime law.
Cybercrime falls into three main categories:
"Three target categories and US prevention failures"
"Physical security, access control, and passwords"
"ISPs, NGOs, police, and governance frameworks"
The fight against cybercrime is a protracted one that requires the contribution of everyone involved in cyberspace activities. The complexity of the crime and the lack of a clear framework to address its effects make it necessary for the world to adopt certain minimum security standards to be followed by individuals and corporate bodies alike. Law enforcement agencies must also be brought on board through a unified command structure and the use of unified cyber legislation for handling transnational cyber disputes. The problem of cybercrime can never be fully eliminated, but it can be sufficiently checked so that it does not undermine the security of information transmitted over the internet or proprietary data held on computers.
You’re 35% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.