This paper examines key ethical issues emerging from internet-enabled crimes and digital rights conflicts. Through case analysis of cyberstalking (Amy Boyer murder), cyberbullying (Megan Meier), and copyright infringement (RIAA v. Verizon), the paper identifies whether these ethical concerns are genuinely novel or represent traditional issues made possible by technology. The analysis demonstrates that while cybertechnology creates new mechanisms for harmful behavior, the underlying ethical principles—privacy, legal liability, intellectual property, and moral responsibility—predate digital systems, suggesting that internet-era ethics requires applying established frameworks to novel contexts rather than developing entirely new ethical theories.
After examining the scenario surrounding the murder of twenty-year-old Amy Boyer, multiple ethical issues become apparent. The primary ethical concern is cyberstalking—the use of internet tools to stalk and harass another person. The perpetrator, Liam Youens, employed publicly available resources to accomplish his stalking. He obtained Boyer's personal information using standard online search facilities and paid a fee to Docusearch.com, an information broker, to obtain her home and work addresses (Tavani, 2013, p. 30).
Beyond cyberstalking, several interconnected ethical concerns emerge from this case: privacy violations, criminal conduct, legal liability, and moral responsibility. The central questions include: Should online search facilities and information brokers like Docusearch.com collect and distribute personal information without the subject's knowledge or consent? Should companies providing personal information conduct criminal background checks on customers before releasing data? Should Docusearch.com and the creators of the web platforms that Youens used to post Boyer's information and murder plans bear legal responsibility—at minimum as contributory parties—for her death? Additionally, do ordinary internet users who encountered Youens' websites containing Boyer's personal information and explicit murder plans bear a moral obligation to report the content to law enforcement or to Boyer herself? These questions represent the core ethical issues in this case.
The case reveals how cybertechnology creates unprecedented access to personal information. While murder itself is not unique to the digital age, the mechanisms enabling stalking—information aggregation, website hosting, and public data accessibility—are distinctly modern. The ethical analysis must therefore address both the traditional crime of murder and the novel technological dimensions that enabled it.
When the Amy Boyer case is compared to the Megan Meier cyberbullying incident, both similarities and critical differences emerge. Legal liability and moral responsibility appear in both scenarios. In the Boyer case, Docusearch.com employees, website administrators, and site visitors could be held accountable. Similarly, in the Meier case, MySpace administrators, MySpace users, and other participants bear potential legal and moral obligations (Tavani, 2013, p. 2, 30).
However, the cases involve distinct ethical issues. The Amy Boyer murder case centers on cyberstalking, murder, and privacy breach—crimes of direct physical harm preceded by digital surveillance. The Megan Meier incident, by contrast, involves cyberbullying, suicide, anonymity and pseudonymity concerns, and deception (Tavani, 2013, p. 2). While both cases implicate third parties (platforms, users, and service providers), the mechanisms of harm and the psychological versus physical dimensions differ significantly. This distinction suggests that ethical frameworks must be sensitive to whether digital conduct enables physical violence or psychological manipulation.
The second major case involves a subpoena issued by the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) to Verizon, an internet service provider, demanding the names of subscribers suspected of copyright infringement through file-sharing. This dispute raises multiple ethical, legal, and policy questions. The core issues include intellectual property rights, privacy rights, constitutional protections, and the practical and moral boundaries of digital piracy enforcement (Tavani, 2013, p. 30).
Several interrelated questions structure the analysis: Should individuals copy and distribute copyrighted music files without permission from copyright holders? Should ISPs comply with subpoenas demanding subscriber information? Must ISPs balance subscriber privacy and constitutional rights against copyright enforcement? Should ISPs face legal liability when subscribers sue them for disclosing personal information? Should ISPs be held responsible for allowing copyright infringement on their networks? Finally, may ISPs unilaterally block internet access to users engaged in infringement?
These questions reveal tensions between competing rights and obligations. Copyright holders seek to protect intellectual property; subscribers expect privacy and due process; and ISPs occupy an intermediary position with unclear legal and ethical obligations. Unlike the Boyer case, where harm is physical and identifiable, the RIAA v. Verizon dispute involves abstract harm (lost licensing revenue) and systemic concerns about due process and government power to compel disclosure of private information.
While the issues in the RIAA v. Verizon case are directly linked to digital technology, they appear unique only in a trivial sense. The underlying ethical concern—piracy of protected material—long predates computers and the internet. Tavani (2013) notes that individuals previously made unauthorized copies of audio cassette tapes using multiple tape recorders, creating the same fundamental ethical violation: reproducing and distributing proprietary material without consent (p. 11).
The parallelism is instructive. The ethical issues surrounding intellectual property rights, privacy rights, and constitutional protections existed in the analog cassette era and persist in the digital music era. Technology has changed the mechanisms of piracy (cassette dubbing versus file-sharing) and scaled its ease and reach, but the core moral questions remain constant. This suggests that what appears novel in the digital context often represents a traditional ethical problem enabled by new technological capabilities. Properly framing these issues requires recognizing their historical precedent rather than treating them as entirely new problems requiring novel ethical frameworks.
"Distinguishes between different intellectual property disputes"
You’re 81% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.