This paper examines the application of discourse analysis within business organizations, with particular emphasis on phone call centers and customer-centric strategy. Beginning with a survey of foundational definitions from key scholars, the paper outlines the seven criteria a communication must meet to qualify as discourse. It then explores how organizations use conversational analysis to evaluate employee focus on customer satisfaction, tracing links between employee emotional state, personal identity, and job performance. The paper classifies the major types of discourse analysis — written, spoken, form-function, and language-context — and explains their practical applications. A dedicated section addresses customer centricity as a strategic imperative, contrasting product-centric and customer-centric organizational models. The paper concludes by demonstrating how discourse analysis can identify communication weaknesses in call centers and transform them into organizational strengths that improve customer satisfaction and corporate revenues.
The paper employs a literature-synthesis structure: it opens each major section by marshalling multiple cited sources around a single concept, then draws a synthesized conclusion before advancing to the next idea. This technique is particularly visible in the definitions section, where seven scholars are quoted sequentially and then unified under a single working definition. It shows how to build an argument from accumulated authority rather than relying on a single source.
The paper is organized in seven sections. The introduction contextualizes the business need. Section two surveys definitions and criteria for discourse. Section three connects employee identity and emotional state to customer-focused performance. Section four classifies the four main types of discourse analysis. Section five pivots to customer centricity as a strategic framework, supported by comparative organizational models. Section six applies the theory specifically to call center operations. The conclusion synthesizes all threads and restates the business case for discourse analysis.
Over the past several decades, economic entities have undergone numerous changes in how they approach business partners, satisfy customers, increase corporate profits, and treat employees. At the same time, expectations on all sides have significantly increased. Most employers strive to offer greater on-the-job satisfaction, but in return they demand that staff members improve their performance in helping the organization reach its overall objectives. Managements have developed and implemented numerous strategies to monitor and develop the human resource, and one of the most relevant such methodologies is discourse analysis.
In terms of historical terminology, the word discourse derives from the Latin discursus, meaning conversation or speech. Over the decades, however, the understanding of the word has evolved to incorporate more forms of communication. Discourse analysis encompasses numerous approaches to studying human interactions in terms of communication. Along the years it has been offered various definitions and implemented with a multitude of usages. A presentation of the most relevant definitions is given below.
M. Stubbs (1983): "The term discourse analysis is very ambiguous. I will use it in this book to refer mainly to the linguistic analysis of naturally occurring connected spoken or written discourse. Roughly speaking, it refers to attempts to study the organization of language above the sentence or above the clause, and therefore to study larger linguistic units, such as conversational exchanges or written texts. It follows that discourse analysis is also concerned with language in use in social contexts, and in particular with interaction or dialogue between speakers."
M. Chimombo and R. L. Roseberry (1998): "Analysis of discourse is a methodology for examining texts and the communicative process that gives rise to them. Its primary purpose is to enable discourse analysts to gain a deeper understanding and appreciation of texts."
D. Crystal (1992): Discourse analysis is the study of "a continuous stretch of (especially spoken) language larger than a sentence, often constituting a coherent unit such as a sermon, argument, joke, or narrative."
K. Wisniewski (2006): "Discourse analysis is a primarily linguistic study examining the use of language by its native population whose major concern is investigating language functions along with its forms, produced both orally and in writing." Otherwise put, discourse analysis is the "branch of applied linguistics dealing with the examination of discourse [which] attempts to find patterns in communicative products as well as their correlation with the circumstances in which they occur, which are not explainable at the grammatical level."
G. Ward (1997): "A discourse is an abstract public sphere of words and images. [...] Discourse analysis has its roots in linguistics, literary studies, and anthropology."
M. J. Terre Blanche and K. Durrheim (1999): "Discourse analysis is a qualitative research design."
L. Zeeman, M. Poggenpoel, C. Myburgh, and N. Van Der Linde (2002): "Discourse analysis is a reflexive process that aims to provide an account of how 'objects' in the world are constructed against a background of socially shared understandings. These socially shared understandings often have become institutionalized and gained factual status. It is a form of social critique."
In order for written or spoken information to be considered discourse, it must meet the following seven criteria:
Cohesion — the grammatical relationship between the parts of a sentence is vital for its interpretation. Coherence — sentences must flow in a logical manner that gives sense to the argument. Intentionality — the writer or speaker must deliver the message in a manner that is deliberate and conscious. Acceptability — the audience must approve the communicative product. Informativeness — the speaker or writer cannot simply restate previous ideas but must introduce new pieces of information. Situationality — the information delivered must be relevant in a certain context. Intertextuality — the information communicated refers to, or is also relevant to, the outside world (Beaugrande, 1981).
In a more simplified formulation based on the above statements, discourse analysis — or conversational analysis — represents the study of various forms of communication in a way that goes beyond syntax or grammatical correctness and looks beyond the actual words to understand what the speaker or writer is in fact trying to communicate.
Conversational analysis has a multitude of applications in the business community, one of the most relevant being the analysis of the focus employees place on customer satisfaction. By listening to pre-recorded phone calls between company agents and clients, organizations are able to evaluate the attention employees devote to satisfying their clients. This process also helps identify how staff members understand and implement corporate culture with respect to the treatment and satisfaction of customers.
A primary point to note about the connection between corporate employees and customer focus is that it can often vary based on the emotional state of the employee. The performance of company agents can be influenced by their feelings at a given moment. If an employee is depressed or sad, his or her focus on satisfying the customer may be limited. If, on the other hand, the employee is happy, he or she will be better motivated to focus on the customer and meet their needs. It has been observed that emotional state does not only affect the employee, but also the persons with whom that employee comes into contact (Coupland, 2001).
Discourse analyses have also revealed a direct connection between the personal identity of the employee and his or her job-related performance. The identity of the individual can best be observed through an analysis of the employee's behavior and the remarks he or she makes about themselves. "This enables a focus on how these assumptions function in talk, that is to blame, justify or legitimize an account. Talk about the self is located in conventions of discourse, which are embedded in wider concerns" (Coupland, 2001).
These findings have been retrieved through the implementation of discourse analysis, based on listening to recorded phone conversations between employees and customers. The tone of the agent and the nature of the remarks are often sufficient to shed light on his or her emotions, which can then be linked to their focus on the full satisfaction of customers' needs and wants.
"Discourse analysis's main aim is usually to show the connection between discursive practices and broader social and cultural developments and structures. The underlying premise is often that discursive practices both mirror and actively contribute to social and cultural change" (Roskilde Universitetscenter). Through a generalization of this statement, it can be said that the discourse analysis of agents in a call center can produce changing effects within the business community. Through a carefully developed and implemented conversational analysis, managers can retrieve numerous relevant conclusions and implement various strategic approaches to resolving identified problems. This would ultimately result in a change within the company's microenvironment, reflected in increased customer focus, better client satisfaction, a stronger market position, and increased corporate profits. The effects of this change would not only be experienced by the organization implementing the discourse analysis, but also by its stakeholders. Shareholders would be significantly better satisfied as their dividends increase, and competing organizations would be compelled to implement better strategies of their own.
The employees would also gain a comparative advantage in the sense that they would come to recognize their limitations and be given the chance to overcome them. Since the actual costs of implementing discourse analysis are quite limited, the procedure stands a good chance of retrieving results that support the future personal and professional development of staff members (University of Texas, School of Information).
The success of an implemented discourse analysis, however, depends on a multitude of factors. Since the study of communication patterns is not an exact science, errors in assessing employee focus could be generated by personal interpretations. A manager might, for instance, identify a problem where none actually exists. Suggested improvement strategies based on that misreading could then have negative impacts and further reduce the attention agents place on customer satisfaction. "Discourse analysis and critical thinking is applicable to every situation and every subject. The new perspective provided by discourse analysis allows personal growth and a high level of creative fulfillment. No technology or funds are necessary, and authoritative discourse analysis can lead to fundamental changes in the practices of an institution, the profession, and society as a whole. However, discourse analysis does not provide definite answers; it is not a 'hard' science, but an insight- and knowledge-based on continuous debate and argumentation" (University of Texas, School of Information).
The employees analyzed through discourse methods are often tasked with providing information to corporate clients. The analysis is then aimed at identifying how well they are able to deliver this information. In this instance, the phenomena of face and politeness become crucially important. Since conversations in phone call centers are not conducted face-to-face, the most important aspect is politeness (Stembrouck, 2006), which is vital for complete customer satisfaction and can be identified and corrected through discourse analyses.
All in all, employees at the call center have the ultimate purpose of transferring information to customers in a manner that is both polite and informative. The discourse analysis conducted on pre-recorded phone calls is a useful means of monitoring communication between employee and customer. It allows corporate management to identify any shortcomings in communication that result in customer dissatisfaction. The conversational analysis is therefore a helpful approach to identifying internal problems and resolving them in ways that increase customer satisfaction and organizational revenues.
You’re 30% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 4 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.